Research trends in K-5 computational thinking education: a bibliometric analysis and ideas to move forward

被引:5
作者
Adanir, Gulgun Afacan [1 ]
Delen, Ibrahim [2 ]
Gulbahar, Yasemin [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Judge Business Sch, Cambridge, England
[2] Usak Univ, Fac Educ, Usak, Turkiye
[3] Columbia Univ Teachers Coll, New York, NY USA
基金
英国科研创新办公室;
关键词
Bibliometric analysis; Computational thinking; Content analysis; CT skills; K-5; UNPLUGGED CODING ACTIVITIES; SKILLS; COMPUTER; ROBOTICS; LEARN;
D O I
10.1007/s10639-023-11974-4
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Computational thinking is a relatively new field for teachers and educational researchers, where new pedagogical approaches emerge to teach various aspects of computational thinking that covers various thinking abilities and techniques for solving problems. Computational thinking concept received great attention from researchers and instructors with an increasing interest related to teaching of computational thinking in K-5 education, as well as the role of computational thinking in kids' gaining of thinking skills and digital competences. Various studies have been conducted related to the implementation of computational thinking activities in schools. However, there is a lack of study that analyzes the trends of these studies. In this respect, this study aims to conduct a bibliometric analysis and content analysis to investigate the computational thinking studies in K-5 level to explore the current research trends in the field. The analysis covers a total of 156 studies conducted between years 2009 and 2021. The analysis separately provides results for early childhood and elementary levels. The analysis mainly revealed that mostly used pedagogical approaches are robotics, block-based programming, stem, unplugged and gaming activities. In addition, the analysis explored the findings based on four aspects of computational thinking; decomposition, abstraction, pattern recognition and algorithm design.
引用
收藏
页码:3589 / 3614
页数:26
相关论文
共 85 条
[1]   Engineering Literacy and Engagement in Kindergarten Classrooms [J].
Aguirre-Munoz, Zenaida ;
Pantoya, Michelle L. .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2016, 105 (04) :630-654
[2]  
AlAmer R. A., 2015, 2015 5 INT C E LEARN
[3]  
Andrian R, 2021, Jurnal Online Informatika, V6, P113, DOI [10.15575/join.v6i1.677, 10.15575/join.v6i1.677, DOI 10.15575/JOIN.V6I1.677]
[4]   Computational thinking education: Issues and challenges [J].
Angeli, Charoula ;
Giannakos, Michail .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2020, 105
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Computing at School Community
[6]   How Many Abilities Can We Measure in Computational Thinking? A Study on Bebras Challenge [J].
Araujo, Ana Liz Souto O. ;
Andrade, Wilkerson L. ;
Serey Guerrero, Dalton D. ;
Araujo Melo, Monilly Ramos .
SIGCSE '19: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 50TH ACM TECHNICAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2019, :545-551
[7]   A Didactical Model for Educational Robotics Activities: A Study on Improving Skills Through Strong or Minimal Guidance [J].
Atmatzidou, Soumela ;
Demetriadis, Stavros .
EDUCATIONAL ROBOTICS IN THE MAKERS ERA, 2017, 560 :58-72
[8]   Analysis of Computational Thinking in Children's Literature for K-6 Students: Literature as a Non-Programming Unplugged Resource [J].
Ballard, Evan David ;
Haroldson, Rachelle .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL COMPUTING RESEARCH, 2022, 59 (08) :1487-1516
[9]  
Barr D., 2011, LEARNING LEADING TEC, V38, P20
[10]   Patrony: A mobile application for pattern recognition learning [J].
Barron-Estrada, Maria Lucia ;
Zatarain-Cabada, Ramon ;
Romero-Polo, Jorge Abraham ;
Monroy, Julieta Noguez .
EDUCATION AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, 2022, 27 (01) :1237-1260