The impact of conventional cost-effectiveness analysis on pricing dynamics in the market of new medicines: a proposed countervailing approach

被引:1
作者
Capri, Stefano [1 ]
Antonanzas, Fernando [2 ]
Levaggi, Rosella [3 ]
机构
[1] Cattaneo LIUC Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Castellanza, Varese, Italy
[2] Univ La Rioja, Dept Econ, Logrono, Spain
[3] Univ Brescia, Dipartimento Econ & Management, Brescia, Italy
关键词
costeffectiveness; cost-effectiveness threshold; drug price policy; drug innovation; EFFECTIVENESS RATIOS; CANCER DRUGS; HEALTH; POLICY; REIMBURSEMENT; EFFICIENCY;
D O I
10.1080/14737167.2023.2184801
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundCountries using cost effectiveness ratio as a decision tool for price and reimbursement decisions still witness accelerating price increases. The objective of this paper is to propose a change in the application of the incremental cost effectiveness ratio as a criterion for price policy.Research designWe develop a model that sets a price for marginal effectiveness equal to the marginal willingness to pay, but it reimburses average effectiveness according to the size of increased QALY gain.ResultsThis new formula also allows to split the economic value of drug between patients and the industry and creates a reward to invest into QALY gains. We show some empirical data of the new prices derived from the application of the new formula, as well as the implications in terms of the consumer and manufacturer ' s surplus based on two potential scenarios of the incentives generated by this new formulation.DiscussionWe propose that small increases in life expectancy be priced differently from substantial as a way of containing the price dynamics.ConclusionsA change in the application of the ICER threshold will help to reduce the price pressure on public budgets.
引用
收藏
页码:431 / 438
页数:8
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], PRESCR DRUG PRIC US
[2]  
[Anonymous], BAL INN DRUG PRIC DR
[3]   Should health authorities offer risk-sharing contracts to pharmaceutical firms? A theoretical approach [J].
Antonanzas, Fernando ;
Juarez-Castello, Carmelo ;
Rodriguez-Ibeas, Roberto .
HEALTH ECONOMICS POLICY AND LAW, 2011, 6 (03) :391-403
[4]   The $2.6 Billion Pill - Methodologic and Policy Considerations [J].
Avorn, Jerry .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2015, 372 (20) :1877-1879
[5]   When is it too expensive? Cost-effectiveness thresholds and health care decision-making [J].
Brouwer, Werner ;
van Baal, Pieter ;
van Exel, Job ;
Versteegh, Matthijs .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2019, 20 (02) :175-180
[6]   Cost-Effectiveness and Dynamic Efficiency: Does the Solution Lie Within? [J].
Camejo, Rodrigo Refoios ;
Miraldo, Marisa ;
Rutten, Frans .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2017, 20 (02) :240-243
[7]  
Capri S., 2020, CURR CONTENTS, V368, pl4627
[8]   Efficiency ratio and rocketing drug prices: old concerns and new possibilities [J].
Capri, Stefano ;
Antonanzas, Fernando .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2020, 21 (09) :1273-1277
[9]   The Economics of Indication-Based Drug Pricing [J].
Chandra, Amitabh ;
Garthwaite, Craig .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2017, 377 (02) :103-106
[10]  
Chi Y-Ling, 2020, Gates Open Res, V4, P176, DOI 10.12688/gatesopenres.13201.1