The preventive effect of glass ionomer cement restorations on secondary caries formation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:16
作者
Ge, Kelsey Xingyun [1 ]
Quock, Ryan [1 ,2 ]
Chu, Chun -Hung [1 ]
Yu, Ollie Yiru [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hong Kong, Fac Dent, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr Houston, Sch Dent, Dept Restorat Dent & Prosthodont, Houston, TX USA
[3] Univ Hong Kong, Fac Dent, 34 Hosp Rd, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Glass ionomer cement; Restoration; Caries; Prevention; Systematic review; RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL; POLYACID-MODIFIED RESIN; CLASS-II RESTORATIONS; PRIMARY MOLARS; PRIMARY TEETH; COMPOSITE RESTORATIONS; ANTIBACTERIAL ACTIVITY; AMALGAM RESTORATIONS; FLUORIDE RELEASE; FOLLOW-UP;
D O I
10.1016/j.dental.2023.10.008
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective: The objective is to compare the preventive effect on secondary caries of glass ionomer cement (GIC) restorations with amalgam or resin-composite restorations.Methods: Two independent researchers conducted a systematic search of English publications in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane and Scopus. They selected randomized clinical trials comparing secondary caries incidences around GIC restorations (conventional GIC or resin-modified GIC) with amalgam or resin-composite restorations. Meta-analysis of the secondary-caries incidences with risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) as the effect measure was performed.Results: This review included 64 studies. These studies included 8310 GIC restorations and 5857 amalgam or resin-composite restorations with a follow-up period from 1 to 10 years. Twenty-one studies with 4807 restorations on primary teeth and thirty-eight studies with 4885 restorations on permanent teeth were eligible for meta-analysis. The GIC restorations had a lower secondary caries incidence compared with amalgam restorations in both primary dentition [RR= 0.55, 95% CI:0.41-0.72] and permanent dentition [RR= 0.20, 95% CI:0.11-0.38]. GIC restorations showed similar secondary caries incidence compared with resincomposite restorations in primary dentition [RR= 0.92, 95% CI:0.77-1.10] and permanent dentition [RR= 0.77, 95% CI:0.39-1.51]. Conventional GIC restorations showed similar secondary caries incidence compared with resin -modified GIC-restored teeth in both primary dentition [RR= 1.12, 95% CI:0.67-1.87] and permanent dentition [RR= 1.63, 95% CI:0.34-7.84].Conclusions: GIC restorations showed a superior preventive effect against secondary caries compared to amalgam restorations, and a similar preventive effect against secondary caries compared to resin-composite restorations in both primary and permanent teeth. [PROSPERO Registration ID: CRD42022380959]
引用
收藏
页码:E1 / E17
页数:17
相关论文
共 125 条
[1]  
Adeleke, 2012, J West Afr Coll Surg, V2, P21
[2]   Introduction to systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Ahn, EunJin ;
Kang, Hyun .
KOREAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2018, 71 (02) :103-112
[3]   Clinical evaluation of bulk-fill resins and glass ionomer restorative materials: A 1-year follow-up randomized clinical trial in children [J].
Akman, H. ;
Tosun, G. .
NIGERIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2020, 23 (04) :489-497
[4]   Secondary caries formation with a two-species biofilm artificial mouth [J].
Amend, Stefanie ;
Frankenberger, Roland ;
Luecker, Susanne ;
Domann, Eugen ;
Kraemer, Norbert .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 2018, 34 (05) :786-796
[5]   Flowable resin composite as a class II restorative in primary molars:: A two-year clinical evaluation [J].
Andersson-Wenckert, Ingrid ;
Sunnegardh-Gronberg, Karin .
ACTA ODONTOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2006, 64 (06) :334-340
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2022, Global Oral Health Status Report
[7]  
Arora Divya, 2022, J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent, V40, P23, DOI 10.4103/jisppd.jisppd_108_21
[8]   Secondary caries risk of different adhesive strategies and restorative materials in permanent teeth: Systematic review and network meta-analysis [J].
Askar, Haitham ;
Krois, Joachim ;
Goestemeyer, Gerd ;
Schwendicke, Falk .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2021, 104
[9]   Secondary caries: what is it, and how it can be controlled, detected, and managed? [J].
Askar, Haitham ;
Krois, Joachim ;
Goestemeyer, Gerd ;
Bottenberg, Peter ;
Zero, Domenick ;
Banerjee, Avijit ;
Schwendicke, Falk .
CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2020, 24 (05) :1869-1876
[10]   One-year clinical evaluation of two high-viscosity glass-ionomer cements in class II restorations of primary molars [J].
Baba, Merve Gok ;
Kirzioglu, Zuhal ;
Ceyhan, Derya .
AUSTRALIAN DENTAL JOURNAL, 2021, 66 (01) :32-40