Protective factors for psychosocial outcomes following cumulative childhood adversity: systematic review

被引:8
作者
Buchanan, Mary [1 ]
Walker, Grace [1 ]
Boden, Joseph M. [1 ]
Mansoor, Zara [1 ]
Newton-Howes, Giles [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Otago, Dept Psychol Med, Wellington, New Zealand
来源
BJPSYCH OPEN | 2023年 / 9卷 / 06期
基金
英国科研创新办公室;
关键词
Childhood experience; psychosocial interventions; clinical outcome measures; social functioning; trauma- and stressor-related disorders; SOCIAL SUPPORT; PSYCHOLOGICAL DISTRESS; HOUSEHOLD DYSFUNCTION; MENTAL-HEALTH; ADULT HEALTH; EXPERIENCES; MALTREATMENT; RESILIENCE; PERSONALITY; DEPRESSION;
D O I
10.1192/bjo.2023.561
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe long-term cumulative impact of exposure to childhood adversity is well documented. There is an increasing body of literature examining protective factors following childhood adversity. However, no known reviews have summarised studies examining protective factors for broad psychosocial outcomes following childhood adversity.AimsTo summarise the current evidence from longitudinal studies of protective factors for adult psychosocial outcomes following cumulative exposure to childhood adversity.MethodWe conducted a formal systematic review of studies that were longitudinal; were published in a peer-reviewed journal; examined social, environmental or psychological factors that were measured following a cumulative measure of childhood adversity; and resulted in more positive adult psychosocial outcomes.ResultsA total of 28 studies from 23 cohorts were included. Because of significant heterogeneity and conceptual differences in the final sample of articles, a meta-analysis was not conducted. The narrative review identified that social support is a protective factor specifically for mental health outcomes following childhood adversity. Findings also suggest that aspects of education are protective factors to adult socioeconomic, mental health and social outcomes following childhood adversity. Personality factors were protective for a variety of outcomes, particularly mental health. The personality factors were too various to summarise into meaningful combined effects. Overall GRADE quality assessments were low and very low, although these scores mostly reflect that all observational studies are low quality by default.ConclusionsThese findings support strategies that improve connection and access to education following childhood adversity exposure. Further research is needed for the roles of personality and dispositional factors, romantic relationship factors and the combined influences of multiple protective factors.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 69 条
  • [51] Understanding Social Support's Role in the Relationship Between Maltreatment and Depression in Youth With Foster Care Experience
    Salazar, Amy M.
    Keller, Thomas E.
    Courtney, Mark E.
    [J]. CHILD MALTREATMENT, 2011, 16 (02) : 102 - 113
  • [52] Childhood Maltreatment on the Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) Scale versus the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ) in a Perinatal Sample
    Schmidt, Madison R.
    Narayan, Angela J.
    Atzl, Victoria M.
    Rivera, Luisa M.
    Lieberman, Alicia F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGGRESSION MALTREATMENT & TRAUMA, 2020, 29 (01) : 38 - 56
  • [53] Childhood disadvantage, education, and psychological distress in adulthood: A three-wave population-based study
    Sheikh, Mashhood Ahmed
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2018, 229 : 206 - 212
  • [54] The potential protective effect of friendship on the association between childhood adversity and psychological distress in adulthood: A retrospective, preliminary, three-wave population-based study
    Sheikh, Mashhood Ahmed
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2018, 226 : 21 - 27
  • [55] Childhood personality as a harbinger of competence and resilience in adulthood
    Shiner, Rebecca L.
    Masten, Ann S.
    [J]. DEVELOPMENT AND PSYCHOPATHOLOGY, 2012, 24 (02) : 507 - 528
  • [56] A developmental perspective on personality in emerging adulthood: Childhood antecedents and concurrent adaptation
    Shiner, RL
    Masten, AS
    Tellegen, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 83 (05) : 1165 - 1177
  • [57] Stavrou P.D., 2017, American Journal of Educational Research, V5, P131
  • [58] ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions
    Sterne, Jonathan A. C.
    Hernan, Miguel A.
    Reeves, Barnaby C.
    Savovic, Jelena
    Berkman, Nancy D.
    Viswanathan, Meera
    Henry, David
    Altman, Douglas G.
    Ansari, Mohammed T.
    Boutron, Isabelle
    Carpenter, James R.
    Chan, An-Wen
    Churchill, Rachel
    Deeks, Jonathan J.
    Hrobjartsson, Asbjorn
    Kirkham, Jamie
    Juni, Peter
    Loke, Yoon K.
    Pigott, Theresa D.
    Ramsay, Craig R.
    Regidor, Deborah
    Rothstein, Hannah R.
    Sandhu, Lakhbir
    Santaguida, Pasqualina L.
    Schunemann, Holger J.
    Shea, Beverly
    Shrier, Ian
    Tugwell, Peter
    Turner, Lucy
    Valentine, Jeffrey C.
    Waddington, Hugh
    Waters, Elizabeth
    Wells, George A.
    Whiting, Penny F.
    Higgins, Julian P. T.
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 355
  • [59] RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN SOCIAL SUPPORT SOURCES AND EARLY ADOLESCENTS' MENTAL HEALTH: THE MODERATING EFFECT OF STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL
    Stewart, Tiffany
    Suldo, Shannon
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGY IN THE SCHOOLS, 2011, 48 (10) : 1016 - 1033
  • [60] The MethodologicAl STandards for Epidemiological Research (MASTER) scale demonstrated a unified framework for bias assessment
    Stone, Jennifer C.
    Glass, Kathryn
    Clark, Justin
    Ritskes-Hoitinga, Merel
    Munn, Zachary
    Tugwell, Peter
    Doi, Suhail A. R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2021, 134 : 52 - 64