Governing the Extraterritorial: Global Environmentalities of China's Green Belt and Road Initiative

被引:8
作者
Liu, Xiaofeng [1 ]
Bennett, Mia M. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Geog, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Geog, Seattle, WA USA
[3] Heidelberg Univ, Ctr Apocalypt & Postapocalypt Studies, Heidelberg, Germany
关键词
Belt and Road Initiative; China; environment; global governance; governmentality; (sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)"(sic)(sic); (sic)(sic); (sic)(sic)(sic)(sic); (sic)(sic)(sic); entorno ambiental; gobernanza global; gobermentalidad; Iniciativa de la Franja y de la Ruta; ECOLOGICAL CIVILIZATION; ECO-GOVERNMENTALITY; GOVERNANCE; GEOGRAPHY; STATE; DISCOURSE; KNOWLEDGE; INSIGHTS; ECONOMY; POWER;
D O I
10.1080/24694452.2023.2249081
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
This article proposes a global environmentality framework to critique efforts to "green" the Belt and Road Initiative (or Green BRI) by examining the Chinese state's environmental governance of extraterritorial spaces. The article transcends a focus within governmentality studies on domestic processes to reveal the relations between governance techniques and environmental subjects, including state and nonstate actors, beyond sovereign borders. Drawing on interviews, observations, and analysis of policies and reports, we identify three ways in which global environmentalities operate and are negotiated through the Green BRI. First, the Chinese state is embracing international sustainable development criteria to gain global legitimacy while seeking to export its domestic environmental governance model, making the Green BRI a dialectic policy. Second, the state is targeting and disciplining BRI participants, including Chinese financial institutions, construction companies, the renewable industry, and foreign state actors in BRI countries. Third, Chinese and BRI partner country participants' variegated subjectivities arise out of the negotiation of their own interests, Chinese state interests, and BRI host country concerns. Our analysis contributes to understanding of how China, as a rising power, engages in global environmental governance and produces extraterritorial environmental subjects.
引用
收藏
页码:236 / 254
页数:19
相关论文
共 100 条
[1]  
Aalberts TE, 2012, PALGR STUD INT RELAT, P229
[3]  
Alves A. C., 2021, RES HDB BELT ROAD IN, P76
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Green is Gold: The Strategy and Actions of Chinas Ecological Civilization
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2020, Green development guidance for BRI projects baseline study report, 2020 Policy Study Series
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Guidance on Promoting Green Belt and Road
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Vision and actions on jointly building silk road economic belt and 21st-century Maritime Silk Road
[8]   Complexities and surprises in local resistance to neoliberal conservation: Multiple environmentalities, technologies of the self and the poststructural geography of local engagement with REDD [J].
Asiyanbi, Adeniyi P. ;
Ogar, Edwin ;
Akintoye, Oluyemi A. .
POLITICAL GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 69 :128-138
[9]   Ecological redlines provide a mechanism to maximize conservation gains in Mainland Southeast Asia [J].
Bai, Yang ;
Fang, Zhou ;
Hughes, Alice C. .
ONE EARTH, 2021, 4 (10) :1491-1504
[10]   Ethnography goes online: towards a user-centred methodology to research interpersonal communication on the internet [J].
Beneito-Montagut, Roser .
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH, 2011, 11 (06) :716-735