Kinetic Modeling of the Devolatilization of Pulverized Coal, Poplar Wood, and Their Blends in a Thermogravimetric Analyzer and a Flat Flame Reactor

被引:7
作者
Lemaire, Romain [1 ]
Wang, Wei [1 ]
Menanteau, Sebastien [2 ]
机构
[1] Ecole technol superieure, Dept Mech Engn, Montreal, PQ H3C 1K3, Canada
[2] Icam Lille, Energy Environm & Mat Engn, F-59016 Lille, France
基金
英国科研创新办公室;
关键词
CHEMICAL PERCOLATION MODEL; BIOMASS PYROLYSIS; RAPID DEVOLATILIZATION; FUEL; COCOMBUSTION; TEMPERATURE; PREDICTION; NETWORK; AIR; TGA;
D O I
10.1021/acsomega.3c03110
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Devolatilization kinetics of coal, poplar wood, and blendscontaining10 and 20 wt % of biomass were characterized. Measurements were carriedout under inert atmosphere with heating rates between 10 K min(-1) and & SIM;10(6) K s(-1) using a thermogravimetric analyzer (TGA) and a flat flame reactor(FFR). Measured data were simulated using the chemical percolationdevolatilization (CPD) model and a global kinetic scheme based ontwo competitive reactions integrating a refined differential reactionmodel. The CPD model failed to simulate TGA results but reproducedFFR data relatively well. As for the global model, selecting kineticparameters from the literature turned out to lead to unsuitable predictions.Fitted values of the activation energies E (a,i ), pre-exponential factors A ( i ), mass stoichiometric coefficients Y ( i ), and the reaction model factor n were therefore inferred using a genetic algorithm-basedoptimization procedure, leading to obtain an excellent agreement betweensimulated and measured data. The assessed E (a,i) values were found to be lower for wood than for coal, which is consistentwith the higher energy required to break the strong C-C bondsholding the highly cross-linked aromatic structures of coal. Besides,blending coal with 20 wt % of wood induced a decrease of E (a,i ) values, which went from 99.79 to86.1 kJ mol(-1) and from 186.72 to 171.57 kJ mol(-1) for the first and second reactions prevailing atlow and high temperatures, respectively. Finally, the fact that theactivation energy of the first devolatilization reaction was foundto be lower with the blend containing 20% of wood than for wood illustratedthe probable existence of synergies, as also exemplified by the characteristicdevolatilization times for blended samples, which were found to berelatively similar to and even lower than that of wood.
引用
收藏
页码:29455 / 29467
页数:13
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]  
Anthony D., 1975, Symposium (International) on Combustion, V15,, P1303, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0082-0784(75)80392-4
[2]   Global Kinetic Modeling of Coal Devolatilization in a Thermogravimetric Balance and Drop-Tube Furnace [J].
Authier, Olivier ;
Thunin, Emmanuel ;
Plion, Pierre ;
Porcheron, Lynda .
ENERGY & FUELS, 2015, 29 (03) :1461-1468
[3]   Kinetic study of pulverized coal devolatilization for boiler CFD modeling [J].
Authier, Olivier ;
Thunin, Emmanuel ;
Plion, Pierre ;
Schoennenbeck, Cornelius ;
Leyssens, Gontrand ;
Brilhac, Jean-Francois ;
Porcheron, Lynda .
FUEL, 2014, 122 :254-260
[4]   KINETICS OF THERMAL DECOMPOSITION OF PULVERIZED COAL PARTICLES [J].
BADZIOCH, S ;
HAWKSLEY, PG .
INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY PROCESS DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT, 1970, 9 (04) :521-&
[5]  
Chen YG, 1998, TWENTY-SEVENTH SYMPOSIUM (INTERNATIONAL) ON COMBUSTION, VOLS 1 AND 2, P1327
[6]   Energy and environmental issues relating to greenhouse gas emissions in Turkey [J].
Demirbas, A .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2003, 44 (01) :203-213
[7]   Impact of CO2 on biomass pyrolysis, nitrogen partitioning, and char combustion in a drop tube furnace [J].
Farrow, Timipere S. ;
Sun, Chenggong ;
Snape, Colin E. .
JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL AND APPLIED PYROLYSIS, 2015, 113 :323-331
[8]   The future environmental and health impacts of coal [J].
Finkelman, Robert B. ;
Wolfe, Amy ;
Hendryx, Michael S. .
ENERGY GEOSCIENCE, 2021, 2 (02) :99-112
[9]   CHEMICAL PERCOLATION MODEL FOR DEVOLATILIZATION .3. DIRECT USE OF C-13 NMR DATA TO PREDICT EFFECTS OF COAL TYPE [J].
FLETCHER, TH ;
KERSTEIN, AR ;
PUGMIRE, RJ ;
SOLUM, MS ;
GRANT, DM .
ENERGY & FUELS, 1992, 6 (04) :414-431
[10]   CHEMICAL PERCOLATION MODEL FOR DEVOLATILIZATION .2. TEMPERATURE AND HEATING RATE EFFECTS ON PRODUCT YIELDS [J].
FLETCHER, TH ;
KERSTEIN, AR ;
PUGMIRE, RJ ;
GRANT, DM .
ENERGY & FUELS, 1990, 4 (01) :54-60