Prostate-Specific Antigen Level at the Time of Salvage Therapy After Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer and the Risk of Death

被引:36
作者
Tilki, Derya [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Chen, Ming-Hui [4 ]
Wu, Jing [5 ]
Huland, Hartwig [1 ]
Graefen, Markus [1 ]
Mohamad, Osama [6 ]
Cowan, Janet E. [7 ]
Feng, Felix Y. [6 ]
Carroll, Peter R. [7 ]
D'Amico, Anthony V. [8 ,9 ,10 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Hamburg Eppendorf, Martini Klin Prostate Canc Ctr, Hamburg, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp Hamburg Eppendorf, Dept Urol, Hamburg, Germany
[3] Koc Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, Istanbul, Turkiye
[4] Univ Connecticut, Dept Stat, Storrs, CT USA
[5] Univ Rhode Isl, Dept Comp Sci & Stat, Kingston, RI USA
[6] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Radiat Oncol, San Francisco, CA USA
[7] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Urol, San Francisco, CA USA
[8] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Boston, MA USA
[9] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Boston, MA USA
[10] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dana Farber Canc Inst, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
TOMOGRAPHY; RECURRENCE; RADIATION; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1200/JCO.22.02489
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
PURPOSEBoth the performance characteristics of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography and insurance approval improves with increasing prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level causing some physicians to delay post-radical prostatectomy salvage radiation therapy (sRT) after PSA failure. Yet, it is unknown for men with at most one high-risk factor (ie, pT3/4 or prostatectomy Gleason score 8-10) whether a PSA level exists above which initiating sRT is associated with increased all-cause mortality (ACM)-risk and was investigated.METHODSUsing a multinational database of 25,551 patients with pT2-4N0 or NXM0 prostate cancer, multivariable Cox regression analysis evaluated whether an association with a significant increase in ACM-risk existed when sRT was delivered above a prespecified PSA level beginning at 0.10 ng/mL and in 0.05 increments up to 0.50 ng/mL versus at or below that level. The model was adjusted for age at and year of radical prostatectomy, established prostate cancer prognostic factors, institution, and the time-dependent use of androgen deprivation therapy.RESULTSAfter a median follow-up of 6.00 years, patients who received sRT at a PSA level >0.25 ng/mL had a significantly higher ACM-risk (AHR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.11 to 2.00; P = .008) compared with men who received sRT when the PSA was & LE;0.25 mg/mL. This elevated ACM-risk remained significant for all PSA cutpoints up to 0.50 ng/mL but was not significant at PSA cutpoint values below 0.25 ng/mL.CONCLUSIONAmong patients with at most one high-risk factor, initiating sRT above a PSA level of 0.25 ng/mL was associated with increased ACM-risk.
引用
收藏
页码:2428 / +
页数:9
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Agresti A., 2013, CATEGORICAL DATA ANA
  • [2] Update from PSMA-SRT Trial NCT03582774: A Randomized Phase 3 Imaging Trial of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron E-mission Tomography for Salvage Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer Recurrence Powered for Clinical Outcome
    Calais, Jeremie
    Armstrong, Wesley R.
    Kishan, Amar U.
    Booker, Kiara M.
    Hope, Thomas A.
    Fendler, Wolfgang P.
    Elashoff, David
    Nickols, Nicholas G.
    Czernin, Johannes
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2021, 7 (02): : 238 - 240
  • [3] Short-term androgen deprivation therapy combined with radiotherapy as salvage treatment after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer (GETUG-AFU 16): a 112-month follow-up of a phase 3, randomised trial
    Carrie, Christian
    Magne, Nicolas
    Burban-Provost, Patricia
    Sargos, Paul
    Latorzeff, Igor
    Lagrange, Jean-Leon
    Supiot, Stephane
    Belkacemi, Yazid
    Peiffert, Didier
    Allouache, Nedla
    Dubray, Bernard M.
    Servagi-Vernat, Stephanie
    Suchaud, Jean-Philippe
    Crehange, Gilles
    Guerif, Stephane
    Brihoum, Meryem
    Barbier, Nicolas
    Graff-Cailleaud, Pierre
    Ruffion, Alain
    Dussart, Sophie
    Ferlay, Celine
    Chabaud, Sylvie
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2019, 20 (12) : 1740 - 1749
  • [4] EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part II-2020 Update: Treatment of Relapsing and Metastatic Prostate Cancer
    Cornford, Philip
    van den Bergh, Roderick C. N.
    Briers, Erik
    Van den Broeck, Thomas
    Cumberbatch, Marcus G.
    De Santis, Maria
    Fanti, Stefano
    Fossati, Nicola
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    Gillessen, Silke
    Grivas, Nikolaos
    Grummet, Jeremy
    Henry, Ann M.
    van der Kwast, Theodorus H.
    Lam, Thomas B.
    Lardas, Michael
    Liew, Matthew
    Mason, Malcolm D.
    Moris, Lisa
    Oprea-Lager, Daniela E.
    van der Poel, Henk G.
    Rouviere, Olivier
    Schoots, Ivo G.
    Tilki, Derya
    Wiegel, Thomas
    Willemse, Peter-Paul M.
    Mottet, Nicolas
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2021, 79 (02) : 263 - 282
  • [5] AGE-ADJUSTED SURVIVAL CURVES WITH APPLICATION IN THE FRAMINGHAM-STUDY
    CUPPLES, LA
    GAGNON, DR
    RAMASWAMY, R
    DAGOSTINO, RB
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1995, 14 (16) : 1731 - 1744
  • [6] 18F-PSMA-11 Versus 68Ga-PSMA-11 Positron Emission Tomography/ Computed Tomography for Staging and Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer: A Prospective Double-blind Randomised Cross-over Trial
    De Man, Kathia
    Van Laeken, Nick
    Schelfhout, Vanessa
    Fendler, Wolfgang P.
    Lambert, Bieke
    Kersemans, Ken
    Piron, Sarah
    Lumen, Nicolaas
    Decaestecker, Karel
    Fonteyne, Valerie
    Delrue, Louke
    De Vos, Filip
    Ost, Piet
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2022, 82 (05) : 501 - 509
  • [7] The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma
    Epstein, JI
    Allsbrook, WC
    Amin, MB
    Egevad, LL
    Bastacky, S
    Beltrán, AL
    Berner, A
    Billis, A
    Boccon-Gibod, L
    Cheng, L
    Civantos, F
    Cohen, C
    Cohen, MB
    Datta, M
    Davis, C
    Delahunt, B
    Delprado, W
    Eble, JN
    Foster, CS
    Furusato, M
    Gaudin, PB
    Grignon, DJ
    Humphrey, PA
    Iczkowski, KA
    Jones, EC
    Lucia, S
    McCue, PA
    Nazeer, T
    Oliva, E
    Pan, CC
    Pizov, G
    Reuter, V
    Samaratunga, H
    Sebo, T
    Sesterhenn, I
    Shevchuk, M
    Srigley, JR
    Suzigan, S
    Takahashi, H
    Tamboli, P
    Tan, PH
    Têtu, B
    Tickoo, S
    Tomaszewski, JE
    Troncoso, P
    Tsuzuki, T
    True, LD
    van der Kwast, T
    Wheeler, TM
    Wojno, KJ
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2005, 29 (09) : 1228 - 1242
  • [8] A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk
    Fine, JP
    Gray, RJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 94 (446) : 496 - 509
  • [9] On the interpretation of x(2) from contingency tables, and the calculation of P
    Fisher, RA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY, 1922, 85 : 87 - 94
  • [10] Hollander M., 1973, NONPARAMETRIC STAT M