Noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) for fetal chromosome abnormalities in a general-risk population: An evidence-based clinical guideline of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG)

被引:99
作者
Dungan, Jeffrey S. [1 ]
Klugman, Susan [2 ]
Darilek, Sandra [3 ]
Malinowski, Jennifer [4 ]
Akkari, Yassmine M. N. [5 ]
Monaghan, Kristin G. [6 ]
Erwin, Angelika [7 ]
Best, Robert G. [8 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Clin Genet, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[2] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Montefiore Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol & Womens Hlth, Div Reprod & Med Genet, New York, NY USA
[3] Baylor Coll Med, Dept Mol & Human Genet, Houston, TX USA
[4] Amer Coll Med Genet & Genom, Bethesda, MD USA
[5] Nationwide Childrens Hosp, Steve & Cindy Rasmussen Inst Genom Med, Columbus, OH USA
[6] GeneDx, Gaithersburg, MD USA
[7] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Genom Med Inst, Cleveland, OH USA
[8] Univ South Carolina, Sch Med Greenville, Greenville, SC USA
关键词
Cell-free DNA; Down syndrome; Noninvasive prenatal screening; CELL-FREE DNA; FALSE-POSITIVE RATES; DOWNS-SYNDROME; 1ST-TRIMESTER; ASSOCIATION; MICRODELETIONS; ANEUPLOIDIES; MICROARRAY; TRISOMY-21; MOSAICISM;
D O I
10.1016/j.gim.2022.11.004
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Purpose: This workgroup aimed to develop an evidence-based clinical practice guideline for the use of noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) for pregnant individuals at general risk for fetal trisomy 21, trisomy 18, or trisomy 13 and to evaluate the utility of NIPS for other chromosomal disorders.Methods: The NIPS Evidence-Based Guideline Work Group (n = 7) relied on the results from the recent American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) systematic review to form the evidentiary basis of this guideline. Workgroup members used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation Evidence to Decision framework to draft recommendations. The guideline underwent extensive internal and external peer review with a public comment period before approval by the ACMG Board of Directors.Results: Evidence consistently demonstrated improved accuracy of NIPS compared with traditional screening methods for trisomies 21, 18, and 13 in singleton and twin gestations. Identification of rare autosomal trisomies and other microdeletion syndromes with NIPS is an emerging area of interest.Conclusion: ACMG strongly recommends NIPS over traditional screening methods for all pregnant patients with singleton and twin gestations for fetal trisomies 21, 18, and 13 and strongly recommends NIPS be offered to patients to screen for fetal sex chromosome aneuploidy.(c) 2022 American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 60 条
  • [1] ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins, 2007, Obstet Gynecol, V109, P217
  • [2] GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 1: Introduction
    Alonso-Coello, Pablo
    Schunemann, Holger J.
    Moberg, Jenny
    Brignardello-Petersen, Romina
    Akl, Elie A.
    Davoli, Marina
    Treweek, Shaun
    Mustafa, Reem A.
    Rada, Gabriel
    Rosenbaum, Sarah
    Morelli, Angela
    Guyatt, Gordon H.
    Oxman, Andrew D.
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 353
  • [3] Cell-free fetal DNA screening for detection of microdeletion syndromes: a cost-effectiveness analysis*
    Avram, Carmen M.
    Shaffer, Brian L.
    Sparks, Teresa N.
    Allen, Allison J.
    Caughey, Aaron B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2021, 34 (11) : 1732 - 1740
  • [4] Blagojevic Christina, 2021, CMAJ Open, V9, pE802, DOI 10.9778/cmajo.20200294
  • [5] First- and second-trimester screening - Detection of aneuploidies other than down syndrome
    Breathnach, Fionnuala M.
    Malone, Fergal D.
    Lambert-Messerlian, Geralyn
    Cuckle, Howard S.
    Porter, T. Flint
    Nyberg, David A.
    Comstock, Christine H.
    Saade, George R.
    Berkowitz, Richard L.
    Klugman, Susan
    Dugoff, Lorraine
    Craigo, Sabrina D.
    Timor-Tritsch, Ilan E.
    Carr, Stephen R.
    Wolfe, Honor M.
    Tripp, Tara
    Bianchi, Diana W.
    D'Alton, Mary E.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 110 (03) : 651 - 657
  • [6] The association between anticoagulation therapy, maternal characteristics, and a failed cfDNA test due to a low fetal fraction
    Burns, Whitney
    Koelper, Nathanael
    Barberio, Andrea
    Deagostino-Kelly, Mary
    Mennuti, Michael
    Sammel, Mary D.
    Dugoff, Lorraine
    [J]. PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2017, 37 (11) : 1125 - 1129
  • [7] Maternal Malignancy Evaluation After Discordant Cell-Free DNA Results
    Carlson, Laura M.
    Hardisty, Emily
    Coombs, Catherine C.
    Vora, Neeta L.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 131 (03) : 464 - 468
  • [8] Coalition for access to prenatal screening, COV SCOR COAL ACC PR
  • [9] First trimester contingent screening for trisomies 21,18,13: is this model cost efficient and feasible in public health system?
    Colosi, Enrico
    D'Ambrosio, Valentina
    Periti, Enrico
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2017, 30 (24) : 2905 - 2910
  • [10] Cell-free DNA screening for trisomies 21, 18, and 13 in pregnancies at low and high risk for aneuploidy with genetic confirmation
    Dar, Pe'er
    Jacobsson, Bo
    MacPherson, Cora
    Egbert, Melissa
    Malone, Fergal
    Wapner, Ronald J.
    Roman, Ashley S.
    Khalil, Asma
    Faro, Revital
    Madankumar, Rajeevi
    Edwards, Lance
    Haeri, Sina
    Silver, Robert
    Vohra, Nidhi
    Hyett, Jon
    Clunie, Garfield
    Demko, Zachary
    Martin, Kimberly
    Rabinowitz, Matthew
    Flood, Karen
    Carlsson, Ylva
    Doulaveris, Georgios
    Malone, Ciara
    Hallingstrom, Maria
    Klugman, Susan
    Clifton, Rebecca
    Kao, Charlly
    Hakonarson, Hakon
    Norton, Mary E.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 227 (02)