Individualistic Versus Collaborative Learning in an eHealth Literacy Intervention for Older Adults: Quasi-Experimental Study

被引:7
作者
Vazquez, Christian Elias [1 ,5 ]
Xie, Bo [2 ,3 ]
Shiroma, Kristina [3 ]
Charness, Neil [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Arlington, Sch Social Work, Arlington, TX USA
[2] Univ Texas Austin, Sch Nursing, Austin, TX USA
[3] Univ Texas Austin, Sch Informat, Austin, TX USA
[4] Florida State Univ, Dept Psychol, Tallahassee, FL USA
[5] Univ Texas Arlington, Sch Social Work, 211 S Cooper St, Arlington, TX 76019 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
eHealth literacy; digital literacy; older adults; eHealth; aging; web -based information; health information; E-HEALTH LITERACY; PROFICIENCY; GENDER;
D O I
10.2196/41809
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Background: Older adults tend to have insufficient health literacy, which includes eHealth literacy-the ability to access, assess, and use digital health information. Interventions using methods such as collaborative learning (CL) and individualistic learning (IL) may be effective in addressing older adults' low eHealth literacy, but little is known about the short-and long-term effects of CL versus IL on older adults' eHealth literacy. Objective: The objective of this study was to use a 3 x 2 x 3 mixed factorial design to examine older adults' learning with CL versus IL for eHealth literacy. Methods: Older adults (N=466; mean age 70.5, SD 7.2; range 60-96 years) from diverse racial and ethnic groups were randomly assigned to either the CL or IL group (233/466, 50% in each). The intervention consisted of 4 weeks of training in 2-hour sessions held twice a week. Using ANOVA and multiple regression, we focused on the main effects of learning condition and interaction between learning condition and previous computer experience. Learning method (CL or IL) and previous computer experience (experienced, new, or mixed) were between-subject variables, and time of measurement (pretest measurement, posttest measurement, and 6-month follow-up) was the within-subject variable. Primary outcome variables were eHealth literacy efficacy, computer and web knowledge, basic computer and web operation skills, information-seeking skills, and website evaluation skills. Control variables were age, sex, education, health status, race and ethnicity, income, primary language, and previous health literacy. Results: eHealth literacy efficacy, computer and web knowledge, basic computer and web operation skills, information-seeking skills, and website evaluation skills improved significantly (P<.001 in all cases) from before to after the intervention. From postintervention measurement to 6-month follow-up, there was a significant interaction between learning condition and previous computer experience based on 1 outcome measure, computer and web operation skills (F2,55=3.69; P=.03). To maintain computer and web operation skills 6 months after the intervention, it was more effective for people with little to no previous computer experience to learn individually, whereas for people with more previous computer experience, it was more effective to learn collaboratively. From postintervention measurement to 6-month follow-up, statistically significant decreases were found in 3 of the 5 outcome measures: eHealth literacy efficacy, computer and web knowledge, and basic computer and web operation skills (P<.001 for all 3 cases). Conclusions: Older adults' eHealth literacy can be improved through effective intervention, and the IL or CL condition may have little effect on short-term outcomes. However, to maintain long-term benefits, it may be best to learn collaboratively with others who have similar previous computer experience. eHealth literacy is multidimensional, with some components retained better over time. Findings suggest a need for resources to provide continuous training or periodic boosting to maintain intervention gains.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 70 条
  • [1] Effectiveness of Instructional Strategies Designed for Older Adults in Learning Digital Technologies: A Systematic Literature Review
    Nahdatul Akma Ahmad
    Muhammad Fairuz Abd Rauf
    Najmi Najiha Mohd Zaid
    Azaliza Zainal
    Tengku Shahrom Tengku Shahdan
    Fariza Hanis Abdul Razak
    [J]. SN Computer Science, 2022, 3 (2)
  • [2] Learning and Use of eHealth Among Older Adults Living at Home in Rural and Nonrural Settings: Systematic Review
    Airola, Ella
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2021, 23 (12)
  • [3] Anderson M., 2017, Technology use among seniors
  • [4] [Anonymous], HELP OLD AD SEARCH H
  • [5] [Anonymous], HLTH PEOPL 2010
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2008, INTERACTIONS, DOI DOI 10.1145/1374489.1374499
  • [7] The promise and challenge of eHealth interventions
    Atkinson, NL
    Gold, RS
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH BEHAVIOR, 2002, 26 (06) : 494 - 503
  • [8] Development of a brief test to measure functional health literacy
    Baker, DW
    Williams, MV
    Parker, RM
    Gazmararian, JA
    Nurss, J
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 1999, 38 (01) : 33 - 42
  • [9] Computer Proficiency Questionnaire: Assessing Low and High Computer Proficient Seniors
    Boot, Walter R.
    Charness, Neil
    Czaja, Sara J.
    Sharit, Joseph
    Rogers, Wendy A.
    Fisk, Arthur D.
    Mitzner, Tracy
    Lee, Chin Chin
    Nair, Sankaran
    [J]. GERONTOLOGIST, 2015, 55 (03) : 404 - 411
  • [10] Gender, group composition, cooperation, and self-efficacy in computer studies
    Busch, T
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL COMPUTING RESEARCH, 1996, 15 (02) : 125 - 135