Risk indicators for obstetrical anal sphincter injury in vaginal birth after caesarean section compared to first vaginal delivery

被引:0
作者
van Bavel, J. [1 ]
Ravelli, A. C. J. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Roovers, J. P. W. R. [4 ]
Abu-Hanna, A. [2 ,3 ]
Mol, B. W. [5 ,6 ]
de Leeuw, J. W. [7 ]
机构
[1] Amphia Hosp Breda, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Breda, Netherlands
[2] Acad Med Ctr, Dept Med Informat, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Amsterdam Publ Hlth, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Amsterdam Univ Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Locat AMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Monash Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Clayton, Vic, Australia
[6] Univ Aberdeen, Aberdeen Ctr Womens Hlth Res, Sch Med, Aberdeen, Scotland
[7] Ikazia Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Anal sphincter injury; Vaginal birth after caesarean; Epidemiology; Delivery; Birth trauma; Episiotomy;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.07.019
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objectives: Comparison of the rate of obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) between women having their first vaginal birth after caesarean section (CS) and true nulliparous women with a vaginal delivery. Assessment of risk indicators for OASI in women with vaginal birth after one CS (VBAC).Study design: 28 535 women with their first VBAC and a cohort of 275 439 nulliparous women with a vaginal delivery of a liveborn infant in a cephalic position from the Dutch perinatal registry were analyzed. We compared the OASI rate with univariate and multivariate analysis. In women with VBAC possible risk indicators for OASI were assessed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis.Results: The rate of OASI was 5.2% in women with vaginal birth after CS and 4.0% in women with a first vaginal delivery. The adjusted OR (aOR) for vaginal birth after an elective CS was higher (aOR 1.34, 95% CI 1.23-1.47) compared to vaginal birth after an emergency CS (aOR 1.16, 95% CI 1.08-1.25). In women with vaginal birth after emergency CS, the aOR for the indication non-progressive labor was 1.18 (95% CI 1.08-1.29), whereas CS for suspected fetal distress was not significantly associated with obstetric anal sphincter injury in VBAC. In the 28 535 women with a VBAC, mediolateral episiotomy (MLE), birth weight < 3000 g and maternal age < 25 years were associated with a significantly lower rate of OASI. A gestational age of 42 weeks, birth weight = 3500 g, operative vaginal delivery and duration of the 2nd stage of labour of = 60 min were associated with a significantly higher rate of OASI.Conclusions: Women with a VBAC have a higher rate of OASI in comparison with women with a first vaginal delivery, with the exception of women with a vaginal birth after an emergency CS for suspected fetal distress. Factors associated with a significantly lower rate for OASI were MLE, maternal age < 25 and birth weight < 3000 g. A gestational age of 42 weeks, birth weight between 3500 and 4000 g and = 4000 g, operative vaginal delivery and duration of the 2nd stage of delivery longer dan 60 min were associated with a significantly higher rate of OASI.
引用
收藏
页码:198 / 203
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] Obstetric anal sphincter injuries-Maternal, fetal and sociodemographic risk factors: A retrospective register-based study
    Andre, Kristin
    Stuart, Andrea
    Kallen, Karin
    [J]. ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2022, 101 (11) : 1262 - 1268
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2019, Obstet Gynecol, V133, pe110, DOI 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003078
  • [3] Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injuries at vaginal birth after caesarean: a retrospective cohort study
    D'Souza, Joanna C.
    Monga, Ash
    Tincello, Douglas G.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2019, 30 (10) : 1747 - 1753
  • [4] Birth position and obstetric anal sphincter injury: a population-based study of 113 000 spontaneous births
    Elvander, Charlotte
    Ahlberg, Mia
    Thies-Lagergren, Li
    Cnattingius, Sven
    Stephansson, Olof
    [J]. BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2015, 15
  • [5] Are women having a vaginal birth after a previous caesarean delivery at increased risk of anal sphincter injury?
    Hehir, M. P.
    Fitzpatrick, M.
    Cassidy, M.
    Murphy, M.
    O'Herlihy, C.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2014, 121 (12) : 1515 - 1520
  • [6] Risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury in women having a vaginal birth after a previous caesarean section: A population-based cohort study
    Jardine, Jennifer E.
    Knight, Hannah E.
    Carroll, Fran E.
    Gurol-Urganci, Ipek
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2019, 236 : 7 - 13
  • [7] Risk of anal sphincter injury in trial of labor post cesarean section
    Levin, Gabriel
    Tsur, Abraham
    Shai, Daniel
    Alcalay, Menachem
    Ram, Edward
    Meyer, Raanan
    [J]. ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2021, 100 (01) : 147 - 153
  • [8] Long-term effects of anal sphincter rupture during vaginal delivery: faecal incontinence and sexual complaints
    Mous, M.
    Muller, S. A.
    de Leeuw, J. W.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2008, 115 (02) : 234 - 238
  • [9] Single prior caesarean section and risk of anal sphincter injury
    O'Leary, Bobby D.
    Nolan, Ciara E.
    Ciprike, Vineta
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2019, 30 (06) : 959 - 964
  • [10] Increased risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury in women undergoing vaginal delivery after caesarean section: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Perslev, Kathrine
    Morch, Ella-Josephine
    Jango, Hanna
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2022, 129 (12) : 1961 - 1968