Closing the Theory-Practice Gap: Socio-Economic Approach and Action Research in Management

被引:2
作者
Kuran, Omaya [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Balamand, Fac Business & Management, Kalhat, El Koura, Lebanon
关键词
SEAM; Theory-practice gap; Action research; Collaborative problem-solving; Transformative management; Management theories; Management practices; DBA executive education; QUALITY MANAGEMENT; SCIENCE; KNOWLEDGE; CREATION; DIVIDE; FUTURE;
D O I
10.1007/s11213-023-09666-8
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This conceptual paper explores the persistent gap between research, practice, and theory in management, hindering the practical applicability and relevance of academic research. It investigates the Socio-Economic Approach to Management (SEAM) as a participatory and collaborative model aimed at effectively bridging this gap. The paper examines the evolution of management theories and the emergence of SEAM as an innovative solution to align theory and practice, highlighting its potential to integrate theory, research, and practice in organizational management. The paper conducts a comprehensive literature review to demonstrate how action research, as incorporated in SEAM, facilitates transformative organizational development and fosters collaborative problem-solving. SEAM's methodology offers a win-win collaboration for both managers and scholars, resulting in actionable knowledge with practical applications. Additionally, it includes a case study involving DBA executive education to illustrate SEAM's practical application. Despite its strengths, SEAM faces criticisms and challenges, including concerns about subjectivity, rigor, contrasting approaches, validity, and generalizability. However, the paper emphasizes SEAM's contributions to action research, offering a fresh perspective that transcends context-specificity and provides multidimensional modeling of outcomes. It emphasizes measurement and quantitative assessment of qualitative impacts, integrating qualitative, quantitative, and financial data to better understand organizational complexity. In conclusion, the paper underscores SEAM's significance in promoting research relevance, enhancing management practices, and fostering better understanding between researchers and practitioners, particularly within the realm of DBA executive education. By advocating for SEAM as a bridge between theory and practice, the paper encourages a more collaborative and effective approach to meet the demands of a dynamic management landscape.
引用
收藏
页码:783 / 810
页数:28
相关论文
共 132 条
  • [21] Brydon-Miller M., 2001, SUBJECTS SUBJECTIVIT, P76, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781351033268-2
  • [22] Buono A.F., 2007, Socio‐economic intervention in organizations: The intervener‐researcher and the SEAM approach to organizational analysis
  • [23] Buono AF., 2015, SOCIOECONOMIC APPROA
  • [24] Cappelletti L, 2010, NORMES ORIGINES CONS, P93
  • [25] Cappelletti L, 2009, FRENCH CASE STUDY
  • [26] Developing human capital through a pragmatic oriented action research project A French case study
    Cappelletti, Laurent G.
    Baker, Charles Richard
    [J]. ACTION RESEARCH, 2010, 8 (02) : 211 - 232
  • [27] Action research: Its nature and validity
    Checkland, P
    Holwell, S
    [J]. SYSTEMIC PRACTICE AND ACTION RESEARCH, 1998, 11 (01) : 9 - 21
  • [28] Churchman C.W., 1968, Challenge to reason
  • [29] Coghlan D., 2001, DOING ACTION RES YOU
  • [30] Coghlan D.Brannick., 2005, DOING ACTION RES YOU, V2nd