Integrating environmental considerations in digital health technology assessment and procurement: Stakeholders' perspectives

被引:10
作者
Alami, Hassane [1 ,2 ,6 ,7 ]
Rivard, Lysanne [2 ]
Lehoux, Pascale [1 ,2 ]
Ag Ahmed, Mohamed Ali [3 ]
Fortin, Jean-Paul [4 ]
Fleet, Richard [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Montreal, Dept Hlth Management Evaluat & Policy, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] Univ Montreal, Ctr Publ Hlth Res, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] Sherpa Univ Inst, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[4] Laval Univ, Fac Med, Dept Social & Prevent Med, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[5] Laval Univ, Fac Med, Dept Family Med & Emergency Med, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[6] Univ Montreal, Dept Hlth Management Evaluat & Policy, POB 6128,Branch Ctr Ville, Montreal, PQ H3C 3J7, Canada
[7] Univ Montreal, Ctr Publ Hlth Res, POB 6128,Branch Ctr Ville, Montreal, PQ H3C 3J7, Canada
关键词
Digital health; public procurement; health technology assessment; healthcare system; sustainability; climate change; environment; SUSTAINABLE PUBLIC PROCUREMENT; GREEN PROCUREMENT; INNOVATION CAPABILITY; IMPACT; CHINA; IMPLEMENTATION; MANAGEMENT; FRAMEWORK; DESIGN; SECTOR;
D O I
10.1177/20552076231219113
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundDigital health technologies (DHTs) are promoted as means to reduce the environmental impact of healthcare systems. However, a growing literature is shedding light on the highly polluting nature of the digital industry and how it exacerbates health inequalities. Thus, the environmental footprint of DHTs should be considered when assessing their overall value to healthcare systems. The objectives of this article are to: (1) explore stakeholders' perspectives on integrating the environmental impacts of DHTs in assessment and procurement practices; (2) identify the factors enabling or constraining the operationalisation of such a change; and (3) encourage a constructive dialogue on how environmental issues fit within healthcare systems' push for more DHTs.MethodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted with 29 stakeholders involved in DHTs in a large Canadian academic healthcare centre. Data were collected and analysed through a mixed deductive-inductive process using a framework derived from diffusion of innovations theories.ResultsThe integration of the environmental impact of DHTs in assessment and procurement is contingent upon key micro-meso-macrosystemic factors that either enable or constrain changes in practices and processes. Innovation (micro) factors include stakeholders' recognition of the environmental issue and the extent to which it is feasible for them to address the environmental impact of DHTs. Organisational (meso) factors include the organisation's culture, leadership, policies, and practices, as well as the expertise and professional skillsets available. Finally, external (macro) factors include political and regulatory (e.g., national strategy, laws, standards, norms), economic (e.g., business models, public procurement), and professional and scientific factors (e.g., evidence, methodologies, clinical guidelines).ConclusionConsidering the environmental impact of DHTs depends on micro-meso-macrosystemic factors involving a variety of stakeholders and levels of governance, sometimes with divergent or even antagonistic objectives and expectations. It highlights the importance of better understanding the complexity inherent in the environmental shift in healthcare.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 129 条
[1]   Public procurement for innovation through supplier firms' sustainability lens: A systematic review and research agenda [J].
Adjei-Bamfo, Peter ;
Djajadikerta, Hadrian Geri ;
Jie, Ferry ;
Brown, Kerry ;
Mavi, Reza Kiani .
BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 32 (01) :387-407
[2]   Green public procurement implementation challenges in Australian public healthcare sector [J].
Ahsan, Kamrul ;
Rahman, Shams .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 152 :181-197
[3]   An urgent call for the environmental sustainability of health systems: A 'sextuple aim' to care for patients, costs, providers, population equity and the planet [J].
Alami, Hassane ;
Lehoux, Pascale ;
Miller, Fiona A. ;
Shaw, Sara E. ;
Fortin, Jean-Paul .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 38 (02) :289-295
[4]  
Alami H, 2020, SANTE PUBLIQUE, V32, P221, DOI 10.3917/spub.202.0221
[5]  
Alami H, 2019, SANTE PUBLIQUE, V31, P125, DOI [10.3917/spub.191.0125, 10.3917/spub.191.0125]
[6]   Unpacking the role of innovation capability: Exploring the impact of leadership style on green procurement via a natural resource-based perspective [J].
AlNuaimi, Bader K. ;
Singh, Sanjay Kumar ;
Harney, Brian .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2021, 134 :78-88
[7]   Public-sector green procurement in the United Arab Emirates: Innovation capability and commitment to change [J].
AlNuaimi, Bader K. ;
Khan, Mehmood .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 233 :482-489
[8]   Quantifying hospital services by carbon footprint: A systematic literature review of patient care alternatives [J].
Alshqaqeeq, Fadhel ;
Esmaeili, M. Amin ;
Overcash, Michael ;
Twomey, Janet .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2020, 154
[9]   The routinization of innovation research: a constructively critical review of the state-of-the-science [J].
Anderson, N ;
De Dreu, CKW ;
Nijstad, BA .
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2004, 25 (02) :147-173
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Les facteurs influencant la dissemination et l'adoption de l'approche Ecole en sante