Artificial Intelligence (AI)-enhanced learning analytics (LA) for supporting Career decisions: advantages and challenges from user perspective

被引:15
作者
Gedrimiene, Egle [1 ]
Celik, Ismail [1 ]
Kaasila, Antti [1 ]
Makitalo, Kati [1 ]
Muukkonen, Hanni [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oulu, Fac Educ & Psychol, POB 8000, FIN-90014 Oulu, Finland
关键词
AI-enhanced learning analytics users; Career decisions; Technology acceptance model; Career decision-making model; INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY; HIGHER-EDUCATION; ACCEPTANCE; CHOICE; STUDENTS;
D O I
10.1007/s10639-023-12277-4
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Artificial intelligence (AI) and learning analytics (LA) tools are increasingly implemented as decision support for learners and professionals. However, their affordances for guidance purposes have yet to be examined. In this paper, we investigated advantages and challenges of AI-enhanced LA tool for supporting career decisions from the user perspective. Participants (N = 106) interacted with the AI-enhanced LA tool and responded to open-ended questionnaire questions. Content analysis was utilized for the data analysis applying two distinct and robust frameworks: technology acceptance model (TAM) and career decision-making model (CDM) as well as looking into user needs. Results indicate that the AI-enhanced LA tool provided five main benefits to the users: provision of career information, research and analysis of the information, diversification of ideas on possible career paths, providing direction and decision support, and self-reflection. The participants perceived the AI-enhanced LA tool as a supportive asset to be used in transitional life situations characterized with uncertainty. Considerable use difficulties were reported as well as need for further diversification of ideas on possible career paths, need for personalization and self-reflection support, and need for further information. Results regarding perceived support for making career decisions showed that CDM elements were unequally supported by the AI-enhanced LA tool. Most support was focused to investigate smaller number of provided options and make decisions, while contextual information was lacking. Implications for career decision making are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:297 / 322
页数:26
相关论文
共 83 条
[1]   Nature and operation of attitudes [J].
Ajzen, I .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 52 :27-58
[2]   THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR [J].
AJZEN, I .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) :179-211
[3]   Factors influencing beliefs for adoption of a learning analytics tool: An empirical study [J].
Ali, Liaqat ;
Asadi, Mohsen ;
Gasevic, Dragan ;
Jovanovic, Jelena ;
Hatala, Marek .
COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2013, 62 :130-148
[4]  
Baker T., 2019, Educ-AI-tion Rebooted? Exploring the Future of Artificial Intelligence in Schools and Colleges
[5]  
Barnes S., 2020, Lifelong guidance policy and practice in the EU. Trends, challenges and opportunities: final report, DOI DOI 10.2767/91185
[6]  
Bengtsson M, 2016, NursingPlus Open, V2, P8, DOI [10.1016/j.npls.2016.01.001, 10.1016/j.npls.2016.01.001, DOI 10.1016/J.NPLS.2016.01.001, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.npls.2016.01.001]
[7]   The Promises and Challenges of Artificial Intelligence for Teachers: a Systematic Review of Research [J].
Celik, Ismail ;
Dindar, Muhterem ;
Muukkonen, Hanni ;
Jarvela, Sanna .
TECHTRENDS, 2022, 66 (04) :616-630
[8]   Learning Analytics Dashboards to Support Adviser-Student Dialogue [J].
Charleer, Sven ;
Vande Moere, Andrew ;
Klerkx, Joris ;
Verbert, Katrien ;
De Laet, Tinne .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES, 2018, 11 (03) :389-399
[9]   Subject choice and earnings of UK graduates [J].
Chevalier, Arnaud .
ECONOMICS OF EDUCATION REVIEW, 2011, 30 (06) :1187-1201