Urinary tract infection in the context of mini-invasive procedures after kidney transplantation

被引:2
|
作者
Kleinova, Patricia [1 ,2 ]
Beliancinova, Monika [1 ,2 ]
Vnucak, Matej [1 ,2 ]
Granak, Karol [1 ,2 ]
Mokan, Marian [1 ,2 ]
Dedinska, Ivana [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Martin, Transplant Ctr, Kollarova 2, SK-03601 Martin, Slovakia
[2] Comenius Univ, Jessenius Med Fac, Dept Internal Med 1, Martin, Slovakia
来源
BRATISLAVA MEDICAL JOURNAL-BRATISLAVSKE LEKARSKE LISTY | 2023年 / 124卷 / 10期
关键词
antibiotic prophylaxis; pig-tail extraction; protocol biopsy; kidney transplantation; RISK-FACTORS; RECIPIENTS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.4149/BLL_2023_110
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
INTRODUCTION: The use of antibiotic prophylaxis in invasive procedures is generally accepted and highly recommended. The question is the need to apply antibiotic prophylaxis even in the case of mini-invasive procedures in the post-transplantation period. The aim of the study was to determine the occurrence of infectious complications during mini-invasive procedures (pig-tail extraction, protocol biopsy) without the use of antibiotic (ATB) prophylaxis. The secondary aim was to identify risk factors for a positive urine culture finding at the time of mini-invasive procedures. MATERIAL: This is a prospective monocentric study in which patients after kidney transplantation at Transplantation centrum in Martin were included (n = 68). We investigated the incidence of positive urine findings at the time of pig-tail extraction (6 weeks after transplantation) and at the time of protocol biopsy (3 months after transplantation) with comparison within the group with and without ATB prophylaxis. RESULTS: Patients in group without ATB prophylaxis had a significantly higher tacrolimus value at the time of pig-tail extraction (p = 0.0274) and a significantly higher dose of mycophenolic acid at the time of protocol biopsy (p = 0.0429). We did not confirm significant difference in occurrence of positive urine findings at the time of pig-tail extraction or at the time of protocol biopsy. We completed a univariate logistic regression in order to identify a potential risk predictor for positive urine findings at the time of pig-tail extraction and protocol biopsy. None of the monitored parameters, including ATB prophylaxis, was confirmed as risk or protective factor. CONCLUSION: The use of antibiotic prophylaxis during mini-invasive procedures (pig-tail extraction, protocol biopsy) in the posttransplantation period had no effect on positive culture findings at our department. Based on our analysis, we therefore do not use antibiotic prophylaxis in the case of these procedures at our centre Tab. 3, Fig. 6, Ref. 23). Text in PDF www.elis.sk
引用
收藏
页码:727 / 732
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Urinary Tract Infection After Kidney Transplantation in Children and Adolescents
    Fallahzadeh, Mohammad Kazem
    Fallahzadeh, Mohammad Hossein
    Derakhshan, Ali
    Basiratnia, Mitra
    Al-Hashemi, Ghamar Hoseini
    Fallahzadeh, Mohammad Amin
    Mahdavi, Donya
    Malek-Hosseini, Seyed Ali
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2011, 5 (06) : 416 - 419
  • [2] Institutional protocol adherence in the incidence of recurrent urinary tract infection after kidney transplantation
    Freire, Maristela P.
    Martinho, Lorena
    Mendes, Clara, V
    Spadao, Fernanda
    De Paula, Flavio Jota
    Nahas, William C.
    David-Neto, Elias
    Pierrotti, Ligia C.
    JOURNAL OF GLOBAL ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE, 2020, 23 : 352 - 358
  • [3] Short versus prolonged antibiotic treatment for complicated urinary tract infection after kidney transplantation
    Avni-Nachman, Shiri
    Yahav, Dafna
    Nesher, Eviatar
    Rozen-Zvi, Benaya
    Rahamimov, Ruth
    Mor, Eytan
    Ben-Zvi, Haim
    Milo, Yaniv
    Atamna, Alaa
    Green, Hefziba
    TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 34 (12) : 2686 - 2695
  • [4] Febrile urinary tract infection after pediatric kidney transplantation: a multicenter, prospective observational study
    Weigel, Friederike
    Lemke, Anja
    Toenshoff, Burkhard
    Pape, Lars
    Fehrenbach, Henry
    Henn, Michael
    Hoppe, Bernd
    Jungraithmayr, Therese
    Konrad, Martin
    Laube, Guido
    Pohl, Martin
    Seeman, Tomas
    Staude, Hagen
    Kemper, Markus J.
    John, Ulrike
    PEDIATRIC NEPHROLOGY, 2016, 31 (06) : 1021 - 1028
  • [5] Updates on urinary tract infections in kidney transplantation
    Fiorentino, Marco
    Pesce, Francesco
    Schena, Antonio
    Simone, Simona
    Castellano, Giuseppe
    Gesualdo, Loreto
    JOURNAL OF NEPHROLOGY, 2019, 32 (05) : 751 - 761
  • [6] Analysis of risk factors for early urinary tract infection after kidney transplantation
    Ma, Zheng-Zheng
    Li, Li
    Han, Yan-Xia
    Duan, Ya-Dong
    Wang, Wei-Zhen
    Niu, Mei-E
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2020, 9 (05) : 2211 - 2217
  • [7] RISK FACTORS FOR URINARY TRACT INFECTION AFTER KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION: A RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS
    Tekkarismaz, Nihan
    Ozelsancak, Ruya
    Micozkadioglu, Hasan
    Caliskan, Kenan
    Demiroglu, Yusuf Ziya
    Haberal, Mehmet
    TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 32 : 296 - 296
  • [8] Impact of urinary tract infection on allograft function after kidney transplantation
    Ariza-Heredia, Ella J.
    Beam, Elena N.
    Lesnick, Timothy G.
    Cosio, Fernando G.
    Kremers, Walter K.
    Razonable, Raymund R.
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 28 (06) : 683 - 690
  • [9] Urinary Tract Infections After Kidney Transplantation: A Risk Factor Analysis of 417 Patients
    Ooms, Liselotte
    Ijzermans, Jan
    in't Holt, Anne Voor
    Betjes, Michiel
    Vos, Margreet
    Terkivatan, Turkan
    ANNALS OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2017, 22 : 402 - 408
  • [10] Antibiotic Prophylaxis at Urinary Catheter Removal Prevents Urinary Tract Infection After Kidney Transplantation
    Wolters, H. H.
    Palmes, D.
    Lordugin, E.
    Bande, R.
    Senninger, N.
    Hoelzen, J. -P.
    Kebschull, L.
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2014, 46 (10) : 3463 - 3465