Factors influencing willingness to pay for wetland ecosystems conservation: a contingent valuation study of lake Victoria Ecosystem in Kenya

被引:1
作者
Mamboleo, Martin [1 ]
Adem, Aggrey [2 ]
机构
[1] RUDN Univ, Peoples Friendship Univ Russia, 6 Miklukho Maklaya St, Moscow, Russia
[2] Tech Univ Mombasa, Dept Phys & Math, Mombasa, Kenya
关键词
Economic Valuation; Willingness to Pay; Water Resources; Lake Victoria; Kenya; ENVIRONMENTAL ATTITUDES; WATER-QUALITY; BENEFITS; SERVICES; FEES; VALUES;
D O I
10.1051/kmae/2023007
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
Wetland ecosystems provide us with various valuable services which are fast degrading due to the lack of effective incentive mechanisms and conservation models for stakeholders involved in managing these ecosystems. This study examines the elements affecting residents' Willingness to Pay (WTP) for the Lake Victoria biodiversity conservation initiative based on a survey of 394 households. Chi-Square test of independence was used to determine the existence of an association between various independent factors and WTP. Logistic regression was further used to determine the influence of these factors on WTP. The results showed that access to grazing land, fishing status, land ownership, business ownership, level of education, county of origin and household monthly income had a statistically significant association with WTP. From this study, it can be concluded that socio-demographic and socio-economic characteristics were constant drivers of WTP for Lake Victoria Conservation Program. This study serves as a valuable input for the identification of the market segment among the residents, which will eventually help in creating more proceeds for the preservation of biodiversity in Lake Victoria Basin. Finally, the study promotes the use of WTP in creating market-based conservation techniques in developing nations to stop the increasing loss of biodiversity and save the ecosystem.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 36 条
[21]   Contemporary human uses of tropical forested watersheds and riparian corridors: Ecosystem services and hazard mitigation, with examples from Panama, Puerto Rico, and Venezuela [J].
Larsen, M. C. .
QUATERNARY INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 448 :190-200
[22]  
Leeworthy V., 1997, NONMARKET EC USER VA, p41p
[23]   Economic benefits of rare and endangered species: Summary and meta-analysis [J].
Loomis, JB ;
White, DS .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 1996, 18 (03) :197-206
[24]  
Mamboleo M., 2021, RUDN J ECOL LIFE SAF, V29, P341
[25]   Estimating willingness to pay for the conservation of wetland ecosystems, Lake Victoria as a case study [J].
Mamboleo, Martin ;
Adem, Aggrey .
KNOWLEDGE AND MANAGEMENT OF AQUATIC ECOSYSTEMS, 2022, (423)
[26]   Economic valuation of biodiversity conservation:: the meaning of numbers [J].
Martin-Lopez, Berta ;
Montes, Carlos ;
Benayas, Javier .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2008, 22 (03) :624-635
[27]   The impact of water hyacinth, Eichhornia crassipes (Mart) Solms on the abundance and diversity of aquatic macroinvertebrates along the shores of northern Lake Victoria, Uganda [J].
Masifwa, WF ;
Twongo, T ;
Denny, P .
HYDROBIOLOGIA, 2001, 452 (1-3) :79-88
[28]   Do user fees exclude low-income people from resource-based recreation? [J].
More, T ;
Stevens, T .
JOURNAL OF LEISURE RESEARCH, 2000, 32 (03) :341-357
[29]  
Pearce D., 1994, The economic value of biodiversity, P172
[30]   Estimating the non-market benefits of water quality improvement for a case study in Spain: A contingent valuation approach [J].
Ramajo-Hernandez, Julian ;
del Saz-Salazar, Salvador .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2012, 22 :47-59