Analysis of peri-implant bone defects by using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT): an integrative review

被引:11
作者
Costa, J. A. [1 ]
Mendes, J. M. [2 ]
Salazar, F. [2 ]
Pacheco, J. J. [2 ]
Rompante, P. [2 ]
Camara, M. I. [1 ]
机构
[1] CESPU, Univ Inst Hlth Sci IUCS, Med & Oral Surg Dept, P-4585116 Gandra, Portugal
[2] CESPU, Univ Inst Hlth Sci IUCS, UNIPRO Oral Pathol & Rehabil Res Unit, P-4585116 Gandra, Portugal
关键词
CBCT; Cone-beam computed tomography; Dental implant; Peri-implant; Bone loss; PERIAPICAL RADIOGRAPHY; BUCCAL BONE; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1007/s11282-023-00683-w
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The objective of this work was to perform an integrative review of the inspection of peri-implant bone defects using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). An electronic search was performed in the PubMed database using the following scientific terms: CBCT or Cone Beam computed tomography; dental implant; peri-implant; bone loss; defects. The survey identified 267 studies, of which 18 were considered relevant to this study. These studies provided important data taking into account the accuracy of cone beam computed tomography in the detection and measurement of peri-implant bone defects such as fenestrations, dehiscence and intraosseous circumferential defects. The effectiveness of CBCT in aiding in geometric bone calculations and in the diagnosis of peri-implant defects was influenced by factors such as artefacts, defect size, bone wall thickness, implant material, adjustment of acquisition parameters and observer experience. A not insignificant number of studies compared intraoral radiography to CBCT in the detection of peri-implant bone loss. CBCT was clearly superior to intraoral radiography in the detection of all peri-implant bone defects, except for defects located in the interproximal zone. In general, studies have shown that peri-implant bone measurements adjacent to the implant surface can be correctly determined, as well as the diagnosis of peri-implant bone defects with an average discrepancy of less than 1 mm from the actual measurement of the defect.
引用
收藏
页码:455 / 466
页数:12
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Detection of simulated periodontal defects using cone-beam CT and digital intraoral radiography [J].
Bayat, Samaneh ;
Talaeipour, Ahmad Reza ;
Sarlati, Fatemeh .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2016, 45 (06)
[2]   Peri-implant bone tissue assessment by comparing the outcome of intra-oral radiograph and cone beam computed tomography analyses to the histological standard [J].
Corpas, Livia dos Santos ;
Jacobs, Reinhilde ;
Quirynen, Marc ;
Huang, Yan ;
Naert, Ignace ;
Duyck, Joke .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2011, 22 (05) :492-499
[3]   Diagnostic Accuracy of Three Cone Beam Computed Tomography Systems and Periapical Radiography for Detection of Fenestration Around Dental Implants [J].
Eskandarloo, Amir ;
Saati, Samira ;
Ardakani, Mahbubeh Purabdolahi ;
Jamalpour, Mohamadreza ;
Mezerji, Naser Mohammad Gholi ;
Akheshteh, Vahid .
CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL DENTISTRY, 2018, 9 (03) :376-381
[4]   Accuracy of cone beam computed tomography in assessing peri-implant bone defect regeneration: a histologically controlled study in dogs [J].
Fienitz, Tim ;
Schwarz, Frank ;
Ritter, Lutz ;
Dreiseidler, Timo ;
Becker, Juergen ;
Rothamel, Daniel .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2012, 23 (07) :882-887
[5]   Evaluation of peri-implant buccal bone by computed tomography: an experimental study [J].
Gonzalez-Martin, Oscar ;
Oteo, Carlos ;
Ortega, Ricardo ;
Alandez, Javier ;
Sanz, Mariano ;
Veltri, Mario .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2016, 27 (08) :950-955
[6]   Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography, dental magnetic resonance imaging, and intraoral radiography for detecting peri-implant bone defects at single zirconia implantsAn in vitro study [J].
Hilgenfeld, Tim ;
Juerchott, Alexander ;
Deisenhofer, Ulrich Karl ;
Krisam, Johannes ;
Rammelsberg, Peter ;
Heiland, Sabine ;
Bendszus, Martin ;
Schwindling, Franz Sebastian .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2018, 29 (09) :922-930
[7]   Accuracy of CBCT images in the assessment of buccal marginal alveolar peri-implant defects: effect of field of view [J].
Kamburoglu, K. ;
Murat, S. ;
Kilic, C. ;
Yuksel, S. ;
Avsever, H. ;
Farman, A. ;
Scarfe, W. C. .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2014, 43 (04)
[8]   Assessment of buccal marginal alveolar peri-implant and periodontal defects using a cone beam CT system with and without the application of metal artefact reduction mode [J].
Kamburoglu, K. ;
Kolsuz, E. ;
Murat, S. ;
Eren, H. ;
Yuksel, S. ;
Paksoy, C. S. .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2013, 42 (08)
[9]   Factors affecting the possibility to detect buccal bone condition around dental implants using cone beam computed tomography [J].
Liedke, Gabriela S. ;
Spin-Neto, Rubens ;
da Silveira, Heloisa E. D. ;
Schropp, Lars ;
Stavropoulos, Andreas ;
Wenzel, Ann .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2017, 28 (09) :1082-1088
[10]   Defect morphology, bone thickness, exposure settings and examiner experience affect the diagnostic accuracy of standardized digital periapical radiographic images but not of cone beam computed tomography in the detection of peri-implant osseous defects: An in vitro study [J].
Pelekos, George ;
Tse, Judy M. N. ;
Ho, Dominic ;
Tonetti, Maurizio S. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2019, 46 (12) :1294-1302