Does preoperative multidisciplinary team assessment of high-risk patients improve the safety and outcomes of patients undergoing surgery?

被引:3
|
作者
Kuiper, B. I. [1 ,2 ]
Janssen, L. M. J. [3 ]
Versteeg, K. S. [4 ]
ten Tusscher, B. L. [5 ]
van der Spoel, J. I. [5 ]
Lubbers, W. D. [3 ]
Kazemier, G. [1 ,2 ]
Loer, S. A. [3 ]
Schober, P. [3 ]
van Halm, V. P. [6 ]
机构
[1] Amsterdam UMC Locat VUmc, Dept Surg, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Canc Ctr Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Amsterdam UMC Locat VUmc, Dept Anesthesiol, Boelelaan 1117, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Amsterdam UMC Locat VUmc, Dept Internal Med, Sect Geriatr, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Amsterdam UMC Locat VUmc, Dept Intens Care Med, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[6] Amsterdam UMC Locat VUmc, Dept Cardiol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Multidisciplinary team; Preoperative consultation; Anesthesia; Frailty; High-risk surgery; PREHABILITATION;
D O I
10.1186/s12871-023-02394-5
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
BackgroundInternational guidelines recommend preoperative multidisciplinary team (MDT) assessment for high-risk surgical patients. Preoperative MDT meetings can help to improve surgical care, but there is little evidence on whether they improve patient outcomes.MethodsThis paper aims to share our experience of MDT meetings for high-risk surgical patients to underline their added value to the current standard of care. An observational study of a retrospective cohort of preoperative high-risk MDT meetings of a tertiary referral hospital between January 2015 and December 2020. For 249 patients the outcomes preoperative data, MDT decisions, and patient outcomes were collected from electronic health records.Main resultsA total of 249 patients were discussed at high-risk MDT meetings. Most of the patients (97%) were assessed as having an American Society of Anesthesiology score >= 3, and 219 (88%) had a European Society of Cardiology and European Society of Anaesthesiology risk score of intermediate or high. After MDT assessment, 154 (62%) were directly approved for surgery, and 39 (16%) were considered ineligible for surgery. The remaining 56 (23%) patients underwent additional assessments before reconsideration at a high-risk MDT meeting. The main reason for patients being discussed at the high-risk MDT meeting was to assess the risk-benefit ratio of surgery. Ultimately, 184 (74%) patients underwent surgery. Of the operated patients, 122 (66%) did not have a major complication in the postoperative period, and 149 patients (81%) were alive after one year.ConclusionsThis cohort study shows the vulnerability and complexity of high-risk patients but also shows that the use of an MDT assessment contributes too improved peri- and postoperative treatment strategies in high-risk patients. Most patients underwent surgery after careful risk assessment and, if deemed necessary, preoperative and perioperative treatment optimization to reduce their risk.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Multidisciplinary prehabilitation to improve frailty and functional capacity in high-risk elective surgical patients: a retrospective pilot study
    Wong, Henry Man Kin
    Qi, Ding
    Ma, Bosco Hon Ming
    Hou, Pik Yi
    Kwong, Calvin Ka Woon
    Lee, Anna
    PERIOPERATIVE MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (01)
  • [22] Preoperative frailty assessment in patients undergoing gynecologic oncology surgery: A systematic review
    Di Donato, Violante
    Caruso, Giuseppe
    Bogani, Giorgio
    Giannini, Andrea
    D'Oria, Ottavia
    Perniola, Giorgia
    Palaia, Innocenza
    Plotti, Francesco
    Angioli, Roberto
    Muzii, Ludovico
    Panici, Pierluigi Benedetti
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2021, 161 (01) : 11 - 19
  • [23] Multidisciplinary prehabilitation to improve frailty and functional capacity in high-risk elective surgical patients: a retrospective pilot study
    Henry Man Kin Wong
    Ding Qi
    Bosco Hon Ming Ma
    Pik Yi Hou
    Calvin Ka Woon Kwong
    Anna Lee
    Perioperative Medicine, 13
  • [24] Perioperative risk assessment of geriatric patients undergoing noncardiac surgery
    Beck, S.
    Buechi, C.
    Lauber, P.
    Grob, D.
    Meier, C.
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GERONTOLOGIE UND GERIATRIE, 2014, 47 (02): : 90 - 94
  • [25] Multidimentional Preoperative Frailty Assessment and Postoperative Complication Risk in Egyptian Geriatric Patients Undergoing Elective Cardiac Surgery
    Tawfik, Heba M.
    Desouki, Rehab R.
    Singab, Hamdi A.
    Hamza, Sarah A.
    El Said, Salma M. S.
    JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE, 2021, 82 (01) : 391 - 399
  • [26] Frailty assessment and postoperative outcomes among patients undergoing general surgery
    Sioutas, Georgios
    Tsoulfas, Georgios
    SURGEON-JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL COLLEGES OF SURGEONS OF EDINBURGH AND IRELAND, 2020, 18 (06): : E55 - E66
  • [27] Comparison of preoperative assessment tools in older patients undergoing cancer surgery: A prospective study
    Philip, Frenny Ann
    Krishna, K. M. Jagathnath
    Bhargavan, Rexeena, V
    Augustine, Paul
    Thomas, Shaji
    JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC ONCOLOGY, 2022, 13 (04) : 420 - 425
  • [28] Preoperative Laboratory Testing in Patients Undergoing Elective, Low-Risk Ambulatory Surgery
    Benarroch-Gampel, Jaime
    Sheffield, Kristin M.
    Duncan, Casey B.
    Brown, Kimberly M.
    Han, Yimei
    Townsend, Courtney M., Jr.
    Riall, Taylor S.
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2012, 256 (03) : 518 - 528
  • [29] Assessment of Preoperative Anxiety and Influencing Factors in Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery: An Observational Cross-Sectional Study
    Oh, Juseok
    Lee, Wonjin
    Ki, Seunghee
    Suh, Jaewoo
    Hwang, Seokwoo
    Lee, Jeonghan
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2024, 60 (03):
  • [30] Does robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy improve outcomes in patients with high risk morphometric features compared to the open approach
    Varley, Patrick R.
    Zenati, Mazen S.
    Klobuka, Andrew
    Tobler, Juliana
    Hamad, Ahmad
    Hogg, Melissa E.
    Zeh, Herbert J., III
    Borhani, Amir A.
    Zureikat, Amer H.
    HPB, 2019, 21 (06) : 695 - 701