Does False Lumen Thrombosis Lead to Better Outcomes in Patients with Aortic Dissection: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

被引:1
|
作者
Zhang, Shiming [1 ]
Sun, Wei [1 ]
Liu, Shidong [1 ]
Song, Bing [1 ]
Xie, Lili [2 ]
Liu, Ruisheng [1 ]
机构
[1] Lanzhou Univ, Hosp 1, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu, Peoples R China
[2] Lanzhou Univ, Hosp 1, Dept Anesthesiol, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu, Peoples R China
关键词
aortic dissection; prognosis; false lumen; meta-analysis; INTRALUMINAL THROMBUS; DISTAL AORTA; ANEURYSM; REGISTRY; SURGERY; REPAIR;
D O I
10.59958/hsf.5739
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: For a long time, the association of the false lumen status and the outcomes of patients suffering from aortic dissection has been unclear, so this review article aims to study whether the unobstructed of the false lumen is related to the outcome of patients suffering from aortic dissection. Methods: We performed this systematic review and meta-analysis according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyzes Protocols (PRISMA) statement 2009 and registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022381869). We searched PubMed, the Cochrane library, Web of Science and Embase to collect potential studies. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess the quality of the included studies. The main outcome is long-term survival. Data included in the study were summarized using the risk ratio or mean difference and 95% confidence interval. Results: There were 16 trials, 2829 patients in total, with a mean age of 62.1 years. Compared with completely thrombosed false lumen, patent group has better long-term survival (risk ratio (RR), 0.88; 95% CI, 0.79 to 0.97; p = 0.01; I2 = 58%) and smaller yearly aortic growth rate (mean difference (MD), 1.03; 95% CI, 0.23 to 1.82; p = 0.01; I2 = 98%). In addition, patients with a patent false lumen had a lower risk of aortic event (RR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.68 to 0.97; p = 0.02; I2 = 37%), but higher risk of aortic rupture (RR, 7.02; 95% CI, 2.55 to 19.3; p = 0.0002; I2 = 0) and hospital death (RR, 2.72; 95% CI, 1.45 to 5.08; p = 0.002; I2 = 0). Conclusion: Completely thrombosed of the false lumen is more beneficial to the long-term survival of patients with aortic dissection. And the risk of aortic rupture and hospital death in patients with patent false lumen is 7 times and 3 times that of patients with complete thrombosed false lumen. It is expected to provide individualized medical care for different types of patients according to different false lumen status to minimize death and related complications.
引用
收藏
页码:E628 / E638
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] False Lumen Status in Patients With Acute Aortic Dissection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Li, Dongze
    Ye, Lei
    He, Yarong
    Cao, Xiaoping
    Liu, Jining
    Zhong, Wu
    Cao, Linghong
    Zeng, Rui
    Zeng, Zhi
    Wan, Zhi
    Cao, Yu
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2016, 5 (05):
  • [2] Reported outcomes after aortic valve resuspension for acute type A aortic dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chen, Shuang-Kun
    Qiu, Zhi-Huang
    Fang, Guan-Hua
    Wu, Xi-Jie
    Chen, Liang-Wan
    INTERACTIVE CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY, 2019, 29 (03) : 331 - 338
  • [3] Extent of Preoperative False Lumen Thrombosis Does Not Influence Long-Term Survival in Patients With Acute Type A Aortic Dissection
    Larsen, Magnus
    Bartnes, Kristian
    Tsai, Thomas T.
    Eagle, Kim A.
    Evangelista, Arturo
    Nienaber, Christoph A.
    Suzuki, Toru
    Fattori, Rossella
    Froehlich, James B.
    Hutchison, Stuart
    Sundt, Thoralf M.
    Januzzi, James L.
    Isselbacher, Eric M.
    Montgomery, Daniel G.
    Myrmel, Truls
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2013, 2 (04):
  • [4] The effect of postoperative anticoagulation on acute aortic dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Gong, Xiangfeng
    Lang, Qianlei
    Qin, Chaoyi
    Meng, Wei
    Xiao, Zhenghua
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2023, 10
  • [5] Is Partially Thrombosed False Lumen Really a Predictor for Adverse Events in Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis?
    Wu, Jinlin
    Song, Jian
    Li, Xin
    Yang, Jue
    Yu, Changjiang
    Zhou, Chenyu
    Sun, Tucheng
    Fan, Ruixin
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2022, 8
  • [6] Aortic arch replacement in patients with previous repair of acute aortic dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sef, Davorin
    Thet, Myat Soe
    Acharya, Metesh
    Tyson, Nathan
    Hadjinikolaou, Leonidas
    Mariscalco, Giovanni
    Oo, Aung
    Benedetto, Umberto
    Luthra, Suvitesh
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2024, 66 (05)
  • [7] Hypothermic circulatory arrest time affects neurological outcomes of frozen elephant trunk for acute type A aortic dissection: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mousavizadeh, Mostafa
    Daliri, Mahdi
    Aljadayel, Hadi Abo
    Mohammed, Idhrees
    Rezaei, Yousef
    Bashir, Mohamad
    Hosseini, Saeid
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 2021, 36 (09) : 3337 - 3351
  • [8] Sex differences in acute type A aortic dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Fialka, Nicholas M.
    Bozso, Sabin J.
    El-Andari, Ryaan
    Kang, Jimmy J.
    O'Connell, Andrew
    Moon, Michael C.
    Macarthur, Roderick
    Nagendran, Jeevan
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2022, 63 (05) : 632 - 644
  • [9] Aortic Dissection and Aortic Aneurysms Associated with Fluoroquinolones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Singh, Sonal
    Nautiyal, Amit
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2017, 130 (12) : 1449 - +
  • [10] Surgical repair of Stanford type A aortic dissection in elderly patients: a contemporary systematic review and meta-analysis
    Bruno, Vito D.
    Chivasso, Pierpaolo
    Guida, Gustavo
    Vohra, Hunaid A.
    ANNALS OF CARDIOTHORACIC SURGERY, 2016, 5 (04) : 257 - 264