A multicomponent health care intervention is associated with improved glycaemic control in subjects with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes compared with routine care: The INTEGRA study

被引:2
作者
Mollo, Angels [1 ]
Vlacho, Bogdan [1 ,2 ]
Gratacos, Monica [1 ]
Mata-Cases, Manel [1 ,2 ]
Rubinat, Esther [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Berenguera Osso, Anna [6 ,7 ,8 ]
Cos, Francesc Xavier [1 ,9 ]
Franch-Nadal, Josep [1 ,2 ]
Khunti, Kamlesh [1 ,10 ]
Mauricio, Didac [1 ,11 ,12 ]
机构
[1] Fundacio Inst Univ Rec Atencio Primaria Salut Jord, Cat Grp, DAP, Unitat Suport Rec Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
[2] Inst Salud Carlos III ISCIII, CIBER Diabet & Assoc Metab Dis CIBERDEM, Barcelona, Spain
[3] Univ Lleida, Pifarre Fdn IRB Lleida, Lleida Inst Biomed Res Dr, Hlth Care Res Grp GRECS, Lleida, Spain
[4] Univ Lleida, Dept Nursing & Physiotherapy, Serra Hunter Lect, Lleida, Spain
[5] Univ Lleida, Soc Hlth Educ & Culture Res Grp GESEC, Lleida, Spain
[6] Fundacio Inst Univ Rec Atencio Primaria Salut Jord, Barcelona, Spain
[7] Univ Girona, Dept Infermeria, Girona, Spain
[8] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain
[9] Innovat Off Inst Catala Salut, Barcelona, Spain
[10] Univ Leicester, Diabet Res Ctr, Leicester, England
[11] Hosp Univ St Creu i St Pau, IIB St Pau, Dept Endocrinol & Nutr, Barcelona, Spain
[12] Univ Vic, Cent Univ Catalonia, Dept Med, Vic, Spain
关键词
appropriate prescribing; delivery of health care; interventions; primary health care; methods; quality improvement; type 2 diabetes mellitus; THERAPEUTIC INERTIA; PATIENT ADHERENCE; MANAGEMENT; OUTCOMES; PEOPLE;
D O I
10.1111/dom.15250
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aim: The INTEGRA study evaluated whether a specially designed multicomponent health care intervention improved glycaemic control in subjects with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes compared with standard of care practice.Research Design and Methods: Pragmatic study in subjects from primary care centres with type 2 diabetes and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) >9% (75 mmol/mol). The multifaceted intervention (N = 225 subjects) included a diabetes-focused visit encouraging therapeutic intensification by health care professionals. Retrospective data from matched controls (N = 675) were obtained from electronic medical records of a primary care database. The primary outcome was to compare the change in HbA1c values between the groups at 12 months of follow-up.Results: The mean HbA1c decreased substantially in both groups after 3 months, and the mean reduction was significantly greater in the intervention group than in the usual care group after 12 months [mean difference -0.66% (-7 mmol/mol), 95% CI -0.4, -1.0; p < .001]. A larger percentage of participants in the intervention group achieved HbA1c <7% and <8% goals (15.5% vs. 5.3% and 29.3% vs. 13.5%, respectively; p < .001). The improvement in HbA1c levels was sustained throughout the study only in the intervention arm. Glucose-lowering therapy was more frequently intensified in patients in the intervention group at the initial and final time points of the study (between 0-3 and 6-12 months; p < .001), with a significant increase in the number of patients prescribed = 2 antidiabetic therapies (p < .001).Conclusions: A multifaceted intervention oriented at reducing therapeutic inertia by primary care physicians was associated with greater improvement in glycaemic control compared with patients treated as per usual care.
引用
收藏
页码:3549 / 3559
页数:11
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] GOAL study: clinical and non-clinical predictive factors for achieving glycemic control in people with type 2 diabetes in real clinical practice
    Al Mansari, Abdulqawi
    Obeid, Youssef
    Islam, Najmul
    Fariduddin, Mohammed
    Hassoun, Ahmed
    Djaballah, Khier
    Malek, Mojtaba
    Dicker, Dror
    Chaudhury, Tirthankar
    [J]. BMJ OPEN DIABETES RESEARCH & CARE, 2018, 6 (01)
  • [2] 1. Improving Care and Promoting Health in Populations: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2022
    American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2022, 45 : S8 - S16
  • [3] Clinical inertia is the enemy of therapeutic success in the management of diabetes and its complications: a narrative literature review
    Andreozzi, F.
    Candido, R.
    Corrao, S.
    Fornengo, R.
    Giancaterini, A.
    Ponzani, P.
    Ponziani, M. C.
    Tuccinardi, F.
    Mannino, D.
    [J]. DIABETOLOGY & METABOLIC SYNDROME, 2020, 12 (01)
  • [4] Atlas D, 2015, IDF DIABETES ATLAS, P33
  • [5] The chronic care model for type 2 diabetes: a systematic review
    Baptista, Deise Regina
    Wiens, Astrid
    Pontarolo, Roberto
    Regis, Lara
    Torelli Reis, Walleri Christine
    Correr, Cassiano Januario
    [J]. DIABETOLOGY & METABOLIC SYNDROME, 2016, 8
  • [6] Gaps and barriers in the control of blood glucose in people with type 2 diabetes
    Blonde, Lawrence
    Aschner, Pablo
    Bailey, Clifford
    Ji, Linong
    Leiter, Lawrence A.
    Matthaei, Stephan
    [J]. DIABETES & VASCULAR DISEASE RESEARCH, 2017, 14 (03) : 172 - 183
  • [7] SIDIAP database: electronic clinical records in Primary Care as a source of information for epidemiologic research
    Bolibar, Bonaventura
    Fina Aviles, Francesc
    Morros, Rosa
    del Mar Garcia-Gil, Maria
    Hermosilla, Eduard
    Ramos, Rafael
    Rosell, Magdalena
    Rodriguez, Jordi
    Medina, Manuel
    Calero, Sebastian
    Prieto-Alhambra, Daniel
    [J]. MEDICINA CLINICA, 2012, 138 (14): : 617 - 621
  • [8] Effectiveness of chronic care models for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus in Europe: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Bongaerts, Brenda W. C.
    Muessig, Karsten
    Wens, Johan
    Lang, Caroline
    Schwarz, Peter
    Roden, Michael
    Rathmann, Wolfgang
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (03):
  • [9] Cohen J., 1988, STAT POWER ANAL BEHA
  • [10] Patient adherence and medical treatment outcomes - A meta-analysis
    DiMatteo, MR
    Giordani, PJ
    Lepper, HS
    Croghan, TW
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 2002, 40 (09) : 794 - 811