Application of machine learning to the Vs-based soil liquefaction potential assessment

被引:9
|
作者
Sui, Qi-ru [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Qin-huang [2 ]
Wang, Dan-dan [2 ]
Tao, Zhi-gang [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Min & Technol Beijing, State Key Lab Geomech & Deep Underground Engn, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[2] China Univ Min & Technol Beijing, Sch Mech & Civil Engn, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
关键词
Seismic soil liquefaction; Machine learning; Assessment; Liquefaction potential; shear wave velocity; DETERMINISTIC ASSESSMENT; PENETRATION TEST; PROBABILISTIC EVALUATION; GRAVELLY SOILS; 2008; WENCHUAN; CLASSIFICATION; EARTHQUAKE; RESISTANCE; MODELS; TESTS;
D O I
10.1007/s11629-022-7809-4
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Earthquakes can cause violent liquefaction of the soil, resulting in unstable foundations that can cause serious damage to facilities such as buildings, roads, and dikes. This is a primary cause of major earthquake disasters. Therefore, the discrimination and prediction of earthquake-induced soil liquefaction has been a hot issue in geohazard research. The soil liquefaction assessment is an integral part of engineering practice. This paper evaluated a dataset of 435 seismic sand liquefaction events using machine learning algorithms. The dataset was analyzed using seven potential assessment parameters. Ten machine learning algorithms are evaluated for their ability to assess seismic sand liquefaction potential, including Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), Quadratic Discriminant Analysis (QDA), Naive Bayes (NB), K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Classification Tree (CT), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM). A 10-fold cross-validation (CV) method was used in the modeling process to verify the predictive performance of the machine learning models. The final percentages of significant parameters that influenced the prediction results were obtained as Cyclic Stress Ratio (CSR) and Shear-Wave Velocity (V-S1) with 56% and 38%, respectively. The final machine learning algorithms identified as suitable for seismic sand liquefaction assessment were the CT, RF, XGBoost algorithms, with the RF algorithm performing best.
引用
收藏
页码:2197 / 2213
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Prediction of sandy soil liquefaction based on machine learning-GridSearchCV
    Wang Z.
    Wang Z.
    Li Z.
    Miao P.
    Wu L.
    Zhendong yu Chongji/Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2024, 43 (05): : 82 - 93
  • [32] Liquefaction Potential Assessment of Soils Using Machine Learning Techniques: A State-of-the-Art Review from 1994-2021
    Jas, Kaushik
    Dodagoudar, G. R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOMECHANICS, 2023, 23 (07)
  • [33] Predicting Earthquake-Induced Soil Liquefaction Based on Machine Learning Classifiers: A Comparative Multi-Dataset Study
    Guo, Hongwei
    Zhuang, Xiaoying
    Chen, Jianfeng
    Zhu, Hehua
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL METHODS, 2022, 19 (08)
  • [34] Application of the Coupled Markov Chain in Soil Liquefaction Potential Evaluation
    Wen, Hsiu-Chen
    Li, An-Jui
    Lu, Chih-Wei
    Chen, Chee-Nan
    BUILDINGS, 2022, 12 (12)
  • [35] Comparison of tree-based machine learning algorithms for predicting liquefaction potential using canonical correlation forest, rotation forest, and random forest based on CPT data
    Demir, Selcuk
    Sahin, Emrehan Kutlug
    SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2022, 154
  • [36] Assessment of Soil Liquefaction Potential in Kamra, Pakistan
    Ahmad, Mahmood
    Tang, Xiao-Wei
    Ahmad, Feezan
    Jamal, Arshad
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (11):
  • [37] Assessment of Soil Liquefaction Potential Using Genetic Programming Using a Probability-Based Approach
    Reddy, Nerusupalli Dinesh Kumar
    Gupta, Ashok Kumar
    Sahu, Anil Kumar
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-TRANSACTIONS OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2024, 48 (6) : 4593 - 4615
  • [38] Revealing the nature of soil liquefaction using machine learning
    Ghani, Sufyan
    Thapa, Ishwor
    Kumari, Sunita
    Correia, Antonio Gomes
    Asteris, Panagiotis G.
    EARTH SCIENCE INFORMATICS, 2025, 18 (02)
  • [39] Application of Dynamic Cone Penetrometer test for assessment of liquefaction potential
    Hashemi, Morteza
    Nikudel, Mohammad Reza
    ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 2016, 208 : 51 - 62
  • [40] Machine learning based fast multi-layer liquefaction disaster assessment
    Chongke Bi
    Bairan Fu
    Jian Chen
    Yudong Zhao
    Lu Yang
    Yulin Duan
    Yun Shi
    World Wide Web, 2019, 22 : 1935 - 1950