Application of machine learning to the Vs-based soil liquefaction potential assessment

被引:9
|
作者
Sui, Qi-ru [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Qin-huang [2 ]
Wang, Dan-dan [2 ]
Tao, Zhi-gang [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Min & Technol Beijing, State Key Lab Geomech & Deep Underground Engn, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[2] China Univ Min & Technol Beijing, Sch Mech & Civil Engn, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
关键词
Seismic soil liquefaction; Machine learning; Assessment; Liquefaction potential; shear wave velocity; DETERMINISTIC ASSESSMENT; PENETRATION TEST; PROBABILISTIC EVALUATION; GRAVELLY SOILS; 2008; WENCHUAN; CLASSIFICATION; EARTHQUAKE; RESISTANCE; MODELS; TESTS;
D O I
10.1007/s11629-022-7809-4
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Earthquakes can cause violent liquefaction of the soil, resulting in unstable foundations that can cause serious damage to facilities such as buildings, roads, and dikes. This is a primary cause of major earthquake disasters. Therefore, the discrimination and prediction of earthquake-induced soil liquefaction has been a hot issue in geohazard research. The soil liquefaction assessment is an integral part of engineering practice. This paper evaluated a dataset of 435 seismic sand liquefaction events using machine learning algorithms. The dataset was analyzed using seven potential assessment parameters. Ten machine learning algorithms are evaluated for their ability to assess seismic sand liquefaction potential, including Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), Quadratic Discriminant Analysis (QDA), Naive Bayes (NB), K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Classification Tree (CT), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM). A 10-fold cross-validation (CV) method was used in the modeling process to verify the predictive performance of the machine learning models. The final percentages of significant parameters that influenced the prediction results were obtained as Cyclic Stress Ratio (CSR) and Shear-Wave Velocity (V-S1) with 56% and 38%, respectively. The final machine learning algorithms identified as suitable for seismic sand liquefaction assessment were the CT, RF, XGBoost algorithms, with the RF algorithm performing best.
引用
收藏
页码:2197 / 2213
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Machine learning approach for evaluating soil liquefaction probability based on reliability method
    Khatoon, Sophia
    Kumar, Kishan
    Samui, Pijush
    Sadik, Laith
    Shukla, Sanjay Kumar
    NATURAL HAZARDS, 2025, 121 (03) : 3313 - 3342
  • [22] A Comparative Study of Soil Liquefaction Assessment Using Machine Learning Models
    Hanandeh, Shadi M.
    Al-Bodour, Wassel A.
    Hajij, Mustafa M.
    GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 40 (09) : 4721 - 4734
  • [23] Assessment of liquefaction potential of soil based on standard penetration test for the upper Benue region in Nigeria
    Wadi, Dafalla
    Wu, Wenbing
    Malik, Ibrahim
    Ahmed, Hafizullah Abba
    Makki, Abdelazim
    ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, 2021, 80 (07)
  • [24] Seismic gravelly soil liquefaction assessment based on dynamic penetration test using expanded case history dataset
    Pirhadi, Nima
    Hu, Jilei
    Fang, Yu
    Jairi, Idriss
    Wan, Xusheng
    Lu, Jianguo
    BULLETIN OF ENGINEERING GEOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 80 (10) : 8159 - 8170
  • [25] Machine learning based fast multi-layer liquefaction disaster assessment
    Bi, Chongke
    Fu, Bairan
    Chen, Jian
    Zhao, Yudong
    Yang, Lu
    Duan, Yulin
    Shi, Yun
    WORLD WIDE WEB-INTERNET AND WEB INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2019, 22 (05): : 1935 - 1950
  • [26] Probabilistic and deterministic-based approach for liquefaction potential assessment of layered soil
    Poddar, Prince
    Ojha, Sauhardra
    Gupta, Mohit Kumar
    NATURAL HAZARDS, 2023, 118 (02) : 993 - 1012
  • [27] Assessment of soil-liquefaction potential based on geoelectrical imaging: A case study
    Devi, Rajni
    Sastry, Rambhatla G.
    Samadhiya, Narendra K.
    GEOPHYSICS, 2017, 82 (06) : B231 - B243
  • [28] Shear-Wave Velocity-Based Probabilistic and Deterministic Assessment of Seismic Soil Liquefaction Potential
    Kayen, R.
    Moss, R. E. S.
    Thompson, E. M.
    Seed, R. B.
    Cetin, K. O.
    Kiureghian, A. Der
    Tanaka, Y.
    Tokimatsu, K.
    JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2013, 139 (03) : 407 - 419
  • [29] Comparison of SPT and Vs-based liquefaction analyses: a case study in Erciş (Van, Turkey)
    İsmail Akkaya
    Ali Özvan
    Mutluhan Akin
    Müge K. Akin
    Uğur Övün
    Acta Geophysica, 2018, 66 : 21 - 38
  • [30] Vs-Based Evaluation of Select Liquefaction Case Histories from the 2010-2011 Canterbury Earthquake Sequence
    Wood, Clinton M.
    Cox, Brady R.
    Green, Russell A.
    Wotherspoon, Liam M.
    Bradley, Brendon A.
    Cubrinovski, Misko
    JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2017, 143 (09)