THE ECONOMY IS NOT FLAT: THE TECHNOLOGY GRADIENT IN THE MASS MARKET ECONOMY

被引:0
作者
Mayer-Foulkes, David [1 ]
Hafner, Kurt A. [2 ]
机构
[1] 1416 Daly Rd, Ojai, CA 93023 USA
[2] Univ Heilbronn, Fac Int Business, Max Planck Str 39, D-74081 Heilbronn, Germany
关键词
Mass market economy; economic growth; income inequality; inefficiency; technology gradient; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; INCOME INEQUALITY; UNITED-STATES; GROWTH; PANEL; COMPETITION; STAGNATION; IMITATION; RETURNS;
D O I
10.1142/S2194565923500112
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In an industrial market economy, the interaction between monopolistic and competitive sectors results in within-country productivity differences, inequality and inefficiency. We demonstrate this using a two-sector mass market economy model. The monopolistic sector represents large-scale, mass production and is associated with innovation and market power, while the competitive sector represents small-scale production and engages instead in technological absorption. The endogenous dynamics of technological change between the two sectors generate a steady state technology gradient, with the competitive sector lagging behind. This technology gradient is a key endogenous feature of the industrial market economy, associated with economic growth, that generates inequality and inefficiency. Inequality is generated in two ways: innovation profits are concentrated among a few owners of large-scale innovation, while economy-wide wage levels reflect the lagging small-scale technological level. The model shows there are innovative-distributive policies that can increase efficiency in production, innovation, and absorption, and restore income equality, increasing wages and reducing profits. A cointegration and weak exogeneity panel study of the US states between 1997 and 2011 corroborates that the large-scale sector drives aggregate employment, wages and inequality, while top income inequality makes the technology gradient steeper.
引用
收藏
页数:44
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   Competition, imitation and growth with step-by-step innovation [J].
Aghion, P ;
Harris, C ;
Howitt, P ;
Vickers, J .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2001, 68 (03) :467-492
[2]   Competition and innovation: An inverted-U relationship [J].
Aghion, P ;
Bloom, N ;
Blundell, R ;
Griffith, R ;
Howitt, P .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2005, 120 (02) :701-728
[3]  
Aghion P., 1998, Endogenous Growth Theory
[4]   Innovation and Top Income Inequality [J].
Aghion, Philippe ;
Akcigit, Ufuk ;
Bergeaud, Antonin ;
Blundell, Richard ;
Hemous, David .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2019, 86 (01) :1-45
[5]   Economics and identity [J].
Akerlof, GA ;
Kranton, RE .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2000, 115 (03) :715-753
[6]   REAL BUSINESS CYCLES AFTER THREE DECADES A Panel Discussion with Edward Prescott, Finn Kydland, Charles Plosser, John Long, Thomas Cooley, and Gary Hansen [J].
Altug, Sumru ;
Young, Warren .
MACROECONOMIC DYNAMICS, 2015, 19 (02) :425-445
[7]   The polarization of the US labor market [J].
Autor, DH ;
Katz, LF ;
Kearney, MS .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2006, 96 (02) :189-194
[8]  
Benhabib J., 2017, NBER WP, P23095
[9]  
Christiansen CO, 2019, HIST GLOBAL INEQUALI
[10]  
Cook Eli., 2019, Histories of Global Inequality: New Perspectives, P35