Personalized colorectal cancer screening: study protocol of a mixed-methods study on the effectiveness of tailored intervals based on prior f-Hb concentration in a fit-based colorectal cancer screening program (PERFECT-FIT)

被引:10
|
作者
Breekveldt, Emilie C. H. [1 ,2 ]
Toes-Zoutendijk, Esther [1 ]
de Jonge, Lucie [1 ]
Spaander, Manon C. W. [3 ]
Dekker, Evelien [4 ]
van Kemenade, Folkert J. [5 ]
van Vuuren, Anneke J. [3 ]
Ramakers, Christian R. B. [6 ]
Nagtegaal, Iris D. [7 ]
van Leerdam, Monique E. [2 ,8 ]
Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris [1 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus MC Univ Med Ctr, Dept Publ Hlth, Dr Molewaterplein 40, NL-3015 GD Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Antoni Leeuwenhoek Hosp, Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Med Ctr Rotterdam, Erasmus MC, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[4] Amsterdam Univ Med Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Locat AMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Univ Med Ctr Rotterdam, Erasmus MC, Dept Pathol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[6] Univ Med Ctr Rotterdam, Erasmus MC, Dept Clin Chem, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[7] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[8] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
Colorectal cancer; Colorectal neoplasia; Colonoscopy; Colorectal cancer screening; Fecal immunochemical testing; FECAL HEMOGLOBIN CONCENTRATION; RISK STRATIFICATION; NEOPLASIA; TESTS;
D O I
10.1186/s12876-023-02670-1
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background In 2014, the national population-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program was implemented in the Netherlands. Biennial fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) for hemoglobin (Hb) is used at a cut-off of 47 mu g Hb per gram feces. The CRC screening program successfully started, with high participation rates and yield of screening. Now that the program has reached a steady state, there is potential to further optimize the program. Previous studies showed that prior fecal Hb (f-Hb) concentrations just below the FIT cut-off are associated with a higher risk for detection of advanced neoplasia (AN) at subsequent screening rounds. We aim to achieve a better balance between the harms and benefits of CRC screening by offering participants tailored invitation intervals based on prior f-Hb concentrations after negative FIT. Methods This mixed-methods study will be performed within the Dutch national CRC screening program and will consist of: (1) a randomized controlled trial (RCT), (2) focus group studies, and (3) decision modelling. The primary outcome is the yield of AN per screened individual in personalized screening vs. uniform screening. Secondary outcomes are perspectives on, acceptability of and adherence to personalized screening, as well as long-term outcomes of personalized vs. uniform screening. The RCT will include 20,000 participants of the Dutch CRC screening program; 10,000 in the intervention and 10,000 in the control arm. The intervention arm will receive a personalized screening interval based on the prior f-Hb concentration (1, 2 or 3 years). The control arm will receive a screening interval according to current practice (2 years). The focus group studies are designed to understand individuals' perspectives on and acceptability of personalized CRC screening. Results of the RCT will be incorporated into the MISCAN-Colon model to determine long-term benefits, harms, and costs of personalized vs. uniform CRC screening. Discussion The aim of this study is to evaluate the yield, feasibility, acceptability and (cost-) effectiveness of personalized CRC screening through tailored invitation intervals based on prior f-Hb concentrations. This knowledge may be of guidance for health policy makers and may provide evidence for implementing personalized CRC screening in The Netherlands and/or other countries using FIT as screening modality.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Colorectal Cancer Screening within Colonoscopy Capacity Constraints: Can FIT-Based Programs Save More Lives by Trading off More Sensitive Test Cutoffs against Longer Screening Intervals?
    McFerran, Ethna
    O'Mahony, James F.
    Naber, Steffie
    Sharp, Linda
    Zauber, Ann G.
    Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris
    Kee, Frank
    MDM POLICY & PRACTICE, 2022, 7 (01)
  • [22] The LEAD trial - the effectiveness of a decision aid on decision making among citizens with lower educational attainment who have not participated in FIT-based colorectal cancer screening in Denmark: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Gabel, Pernille
    Larsen, Mette Bach
    Kirkegaard, Pia
    Edwards, Adrian
    Andersen, Berit
    TRIALS, 2018, 19
  • [23] FIT-based risk-stratification model effectively screens colorectal neoplasia and early-onset colorectal cancer in Chinese population: a nationwide multicenter prospective study
    Zhao, Shengbing
    Wang, Shuling
    Pan, Peng
    Xia, Tian
    Wang, Rundong
    Cai, Quancai
    Chang, Xin
    Yang, Fan
    Gu, Lun
    He, Zixuan
    Wu, Jiayi
    Meng, Qianqian
    Wang, Tongchang
    Fang, Qiwen
    Mou, Xiaomei
    Yu, Honggang
    Zheng, Jinghua
    Bai, Cheng
    Zou, Yingbin
    Chen, Dongfeng
    Zou, Xiaoping
    Ren, Xu
    Xu, Leiming
    Yao, Ping
    Xiong, Guangsu
    Shu, Xu
    Dang, Tong
    Zhang, Li
    Wang, Wen
    Kang, Shengchao
    Cao, Hongfei
    Gong, Aixia
    Li, Jun
    Zhang, Heng
    Du, Yiqi
    Li, Zhaoshen
    Bai, Yu
    JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY & ONCOLOGY, 2022, 15 (01)
  • [24] A digital intake tool to avert outpatient visits in a FIT-based colorectal cancer screening population: study protocol of a multicentre, prospective non-randomized trial - the DIT-trial (vol 24, 38, 2024)
    Marijnissen, Fleur E.
    de Jonge, Pieter J. F.
    Erler, Nicole S.
    Ismail, Sohal Y.
    Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris
    Spaander, Manon C. W.
    BMC GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [25] Sensitivity of a colorectal cancer screening program based on a guaiac test: A population-based study
    Giai, Joris
    Exbrayat, Catherine
    Boussat, Bastien
    Poncet, Florence
    Du Colombier, Patrice Bureau
    Colonna, Marc
    Seigneurin, Arnaud
    CLINICS AND RESEARCH IN HEPATOLOGY AND GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 38 (01) : 106 - 111
  • [26] Comparative cost-effectiveness of mailed fecal immunochemical testing (FIT)-based interventions for increasing colorectal cancer screening in the medicaid population
    Wheeler, Stephanie B.
    O'Leary, Meghan C.
    Rhode, Jewels
    Yang, Jeff Y.
    Drechsel, Rebecca
    Plescia, Marcus
    Reuland, Daniel S.
    Brenner, Alison T.
    CANCER, 2020, 126 (18) : 4197 - 4208
  • [27] Korean colonoscopy screening pilot study (K-cospi) for screening colorectal cancer: study protocol for the multicenter, community-based clinical trial
    Park, Bomi
    Jun, Jae Kwan
    Kim, Byung Chang
    Choi, Kui Son
    Suh, Mina
    BMC GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [28] Korean colonoscopy screening pilot study (K-cospi) for screening colorectal cancer: study protocol for the multicenter, community-based clinical trial
    Bomi Park
    Jae Kwan Jun
    Byung Chang Kim
    Kui Son Choi
    Mina Suh
    BMC Gastroenterology, 21
  • [29] FIT-based risk-stratification model effectively screens colorectal neoplasia and early-onset colorectal cancer in Chinese population: a nationwide multicenter prospective study
    Shengbing Zhao
    Shuling Wang
    Peng Pan
    Tian Xia
    Rundong Wang
    Quancai Cai
    Xin Chang
    Fan Yang
    Lun Gu
    Zixuan He
    Jiayi Wu
    Qianqian Meng
    Tongchang Wang
    Qiwen Fang
    Xiaomei Mou
    Honggang Yu
    Jinghua Zheng
    Cheng Bai
    Yingbin Zou
    Dongfeng Chen
    Xiaoping Zou
    Xu Ren
    Leiming Xu
    Ping Yao
    Guangsu Xiong
    Xu Shu
    Tong Dang
    Li Zhang
    Wen Wang
    Shengchao Kang
    Hongfei Cao
    Aixia Gong
    Jun Li
    Heng Zhang
    Yiqi Du
    Zhaoshen Li
    Yu Bai
    Journal of Hematology & Oncology, 15
  • [30] Implementation challenges and successes of a population-based colorectal cancer screening program: a qualitative study of stakeholder perspectives
    Elizabeth G Liles
    Jennifer L Schneider
    Adrianne C Feldstein
    David M Mosen
    Nancy Perrin
    Ana Gabriela Rosales
    David H Smith
    Implementation Science, 10