How Do Users Examine Online Messages to Determine If They Are Credible? An Eye-Tracking Study of Digital Literacy, Visual Attention to Metadata, and Success in Misinformation Identification

被引:2
作者
Steinfeld, Nili [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Ariel Univ, Digital Commun Track, Sch Commun, Ariel, Israel
[2] Ariel Univ, Kiryat HaMada 3, IL-40700 Ariel, Israel
来源
SOCIAL MEDIA + SOCIETY | 2023年 / 9卷 / 03期
关键词
misinformation; eye-tracking; social media; digital literacy; digital skills; data literacy; metadata; fake news; credibility; FAKE NEWS; PEOPLE;
D O I
10.1177/20563051231196871
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Although previous studies examined the role of digital literacy in successful identification of misinformation, scant scholarly attention has been given to users' attention to metadata as informative areas that attest to message credibility. This study introduces a novel approach and methodology to contribute to our understanding of how users evaluate and identify misinformation, and the relationship between users' ocular attention to metadata, misinformation identification, and digital literacy. In an eye-tracking study, participants were asked to rate the credibility of online messages posted on social media and web pages. Throughout the session, participants' eye movements were recorded. The results indicate that digital literacy predicts successful identification of online misinformation, as well as webpage scan patterns, specifically devoting attention and focusing gaze at metadata areas that provide cues attesting to the credibility of the messages. In addition, successful identification of misinformation is positively linked to ocular attention to information metadata. In other words, technology-savvy users devote more attention to information metadata, which leads to better identification of misinformation, and they are also directly more successful at identifying misinformation online.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 83 条
[1]  
Abeysinghe Y., 2023, Exploring human perception while reading fake and real news articles
[2]   Exploring Content-Based and Meta-Data Analysis for Detecting Fake News Infodemic: A case study on COVID-19 [J].
Ajao, Oluwaseun ;
Garg, Ashish ;
Da Costa-Abreu, Marjory .
2022 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PATTERN RECOGNITION SYSTEMS (ICPRS), 2022,
[3]   Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election [J].
Allcott, Hunt ;
Gentzkow, Matthew .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2017, 31 (02) :211-235
[4]  
Aufderheide P., 1993, MEDIA LITERACY REPOR
[5]   When Fake News Becomes Real Combined Exposure to Multiple News Sources and Political Attitudes of Inefficacy, Alienation, and Cynicism [J].
Balmas, Meital .
COMMUNICATION RESEARCH, 2014, 41 (03) :430-454
[6]  
Barthel Michael, 2016, Pew Research Center, V15, P12
[7]  
Bozkir E., 2022, 2022 Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications, P1
[8]   Why we need a new approach to teaching digital literacy [J].
Breakstone, Joel ;
McGrew, Sarah ;
Smith, Mark ;
Ortega, Teresa ;
Wineburg, Sam .
PHI DELTA KAPPAN, 2018, 99 (06) :27-32
[9]  
Bulger M., 2018, The promises, challenges, and futures of media literacy
[10]   Do tabloids poison the well of social media? Explaining democratically dysfunctional news sharing [J].
Chadwick, Andrew ;
Vaccari, Cristian ;
O'Loughlin, Ben .
NEW MEDIA & SOCIETY, 2018, 20 (11) :4255-4274