Evaluation of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography and Development of Flowchart for BI-RADS Classification of Breast Lesions

被引:1
作者
Klaric, Kristina [1 ]
Sribar, Andrej [2 ,3 ]
Budisavljevic, Anuska [4 ]
Labinac, Loredana [5 ]
Valkovic Zujic, Petra [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Pula Gen Hosp, Dept Radiol, Pula 52100, Croatia
[2] Dubrava Clin Hosp, Clin Anesthesiol Resuscitat & Intens Care Med, Zagreb 10000, Croatia
[3] Zagreb Univ, Sch Dent Med, Zagreb 10000, Croatia
[4] Pula Gen Hosp, Dept Oncol, Pula 52100, Croatia
[5] Pula Gen Hosp, Dept Pathol & Cytol, Pula 52100, Croatia
[6] Clin Hosp Ctr Rijeka, Dept Radiol, Rijeka 51000, Croatia
[7] Univ Rijeka, Fac Med, Brace Branchetta 20, Rijeka 51000, Croatia
关键词
breast cancer; contrast-enhanced mammography; magnetic resonance imaging;
D O I
10.3390/diagnostics13111958
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
This study aimed to evaluate contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) and to compare breast lesions on CEM and breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using 5 features. We propose a flowchart for BI-RADS classification of breast lesions on CEM based on the Kaiser score (KS) flowchart for breast MRI. Sixty-eight subjects (women and men; median age 61.4 +/- 11.6 years) who were suspected of having a malignant process in the breast based on digital mammography (MG) findings were included in the study. The patients underwent breast ultrasound (US), CEM, MRI and biopsy of the suspicious lesion. There were 47 patients with malignant lesions confirmed by biopsy and 21 patients with benign lesions, for each of which a KS was calculated. In the patients with malignant lesions, the MRI-derived KS was 9 (IQR 8-9); its CEM equivalent was 9 (IQR 8-9); and BI-RADS was 5 (IQR 4-5). In patients with benign lesions, MRI-derived KS was 3 (IQR 2-3); its CEM equivalent was 3 (IQR 1.7-5); and BI-RADS was 3 (IQR 0-4). There was no significant difference between the ROC-AUC of CEM and MRI (p = 0.749). In conclusion, there were no significant differences in KS results between CEM and breast MRI. The KS flowchart is useful for evaluating breast lesions on CEM.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 25 条
[21]  
R Core Team R, 2021, LANGUAGE ENV STAT CO
[22]   Value of contrast-enhanced mammography combined with the Kaiser score for clinical decision-making regarding tomosynthesis BI-RADS 4A lesions [J].
Rong, Xiaocui ;
Kang, Yihe ;
Xue, Jing ;
Han, Pengyin ;
Li, Zhigang ;
Yang, Guang ;
Shi, Gaofeng .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2022, 32 (11) :7439-7447
[23]   Contrast-enhanced mammography: past, present, and future [J].
Sogani, Julie ;
Mango, Victoria L. ;
Keating, Delia ;
Sung, Janice S. ;
Jochelson, Maxine S. .
CLINICAL IMAGING, 2021, 69 :269-279
[24]   Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries [J].
Sung, Hyuna ;
Ferlay, Jacques ;
Siegel, Rebecca L. ;
Laversanne, Mathieu ;
Soerjomataram, Isabelle ;
Jemal, Ahmedin ;
Bray, Freddie .
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2021, 71 (03) :209-249
[25]  
Thiele Christian, 2022, CRAN