Evaluation of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography and Development of Flowchart for BI-RADS Classification of Breast Lesions

被引:1
作者
Klaric, Kristina [1 ]
Sribar, Andrej [2 ,3 ]
Budisavljevic, Anuska [4 ]
Labinac, Loredana [5 ]
Valkovic Zujic, Petra [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Pula Gen Hosp, Dept Radiol, Pula 52100, Croatia
[2] Dubrava Clin Hosp, Clin Anesthesiol Resuscitat & Intens Care Med, Zagreb 10000, Croatia
[3] Zagreb Univ, Sch Dent Med, Zagreb 10000, Croatia
[4] Pula Gen Hosp, Dept Oncol, Pula 52100, Croatia
[5] Pula Gen Hosp, Dept Pathol & Cytol, Pula 52100, Croatia
[6] Clin Hosp Ctr Rijeka, Dept Radiol, Rijeka 51000, Croatia
[7] Univ Rijeka, Fac Med, Brace Branchetta 20, Rijeka 51000, Croatia
关键词
breast cancer; contrast-enhanced mammography; magnetic resonance imaging;
D O I
10.3390/diagnostics13111958
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
This study aimed to evaluate contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) and to compare breast lesions on CEM and breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using 5 features. We propose a flowchart for BI-RADS classification of breast lesions on CEM based on the Kaiser score (KS) flowchart for breast MRI. Sixty-eight subjects (women and men; median age 61.4 +/- 11.6 years) who were suspected of having a malignant process in the breast based on digital mammography (MG) findings were included in the study. The patients underwent breast ultrasound (US), CEM, MRI and biopsy of the suspicious lesion. There were 47 patients with malignant lesions confirmed by biopsy and 21 patients with benign lesions, for each of which a KS was calculated. In the patients with malignant lesions, the MRI-derived KS was 9 (IQR 8-9); its CEM equivalent was 9 (IQR 8-9); and BI-RADS was 5 (IQR 4-5). In patients with benign lesions, MRI-derived KS was 3 (IQR 2-3); its CEM equivalent was 3 (IQR 1.7-5); and BI-RADS was 3 (IQR 0-4). There was no significant difference between the ROC-AUC of CEM and MRI (p = 0.749). In conclusion, there were no significant differences in KS results between CEM and breast MRI. The KS flowchart is useful for evaluating breast lesions on CEM.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] acr, Contrast enhanced mammography imaging screening trial (CMIST)
  • [2] Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography without and with a delayed image for diagnosing malignancy among mass lesions in dense breast
    Ainakulova, Akmaral Serikovna
    Zholdybay, Zhamilya Zholdybay
    Kaidarova, Dilyara Radikovna
    Inozemtceva, Natalya Igorevna
    Gabdullina, Madina Orazaykyzy
    Zhakenova, Zhanar Kabdualievna
    Panina, Alexandra Sergeevna
    Toleshbayev, Dias Kairatovich
    Amankulov, Jandos Mukhtarovich
    [J]. WSPOLCZESNA ONKOLOGIA-CONTEMPORARY ONCOLOGY, 2021, 25 (01): : 17 - 22
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2022, EASYROC WEB TOOL
  • [4] Current and future burden of breast cancer: Global statistics for 2020 and 2040
    Arnold, Melina
    Morgan, Eileen
    Rumgay, Harriet
    Mafra, Allini
    Singh, Deependra
    Laversanne, Mathieu
    Vignat, Jerome
    Gralow, Julie R.
    Cardoso, Fatima
    Siesling, Sabine
    Soerjomataram, Isabelle
    [J]. BREAST, 2022, 66 : 15 - 23
  • [5] Application of MR Mammography Beyond Local Staging: Is There a Potential to Accurately Assess Axillary Lymph Nodes? Evaluation of an Extended Protocol in an Initial Prospective Study
    Baltzer, Pascal A. T.
    Dietzel, Matthias
    Burmeister, Hartmut P.
    Zoubi, Ramy
    Gajda, Mieczyslaw
    Camara, Oumar
    Kaiser, Werner A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2011, 196 (05) : W641 - W647
  • [6] Evidence-Based and Structured Diagnosis in Breast MRI using the Kaiser Score
    Baltzer, Pascal Andreas Thomas
    Krug, Kathrin Barbara
    Dietzel, Matthias
    [J]. ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2022, 194 (11): : 1216 - 1228
  • [7] Established breast cancer risk factors and risk of intrinsic tumor subtypes
    Barnard, Mollie E.
    Boeke, Caroline E.
    Tamimi, Rulla M.
    [J]. BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-REVIEWS ON CANCER, 2015, 1856 (01): : 73 - 85
  • [8] Early breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up
    Cardoso, F.
    Kyriakides, S.
    Ohno, S.
    Penault-Llorca, F.
    Poortmans, P.
    Rubio, I. T.
    Zackrisson, S.
    Senkus, E.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2019, 30 (08) : 1194 - 1220
  • [9] Dual-Energy Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography: Enhancement Analysis on BI-RADS 4 Non-Mass Microcalcifications in Screened Women
    Cheung, Yun-Chung
    Juan, Yu-Hsiang
    Lin, Yu-Ching
    Lo, Yung-Feng
    Tsai, Hsiu-Pei
    Ueng, Shir-Hwa
    Chen, Shin-Cheh
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (09):
  • [10] Friesen L., 2019, Psychometrics & Post-Data Analysis: Test ROC jamovi module