Facilitators and barriers in general practitioners' choice to work in primary care units in Austria: a qualitative study

被引:0
作者
Burgmann, Sarah [1 ,4 ]
Huter, Sebastian [2 ]
Mayerl, Hannes [3 ]
Paier-Abuzahra, Muna [4 ,5 ]
Siebenhofer, Andrea [4 ]
机构
[1] Gesundheit Osterreich GmbH, Planung & Systementwicklung, Koordinat Primarversorgung, Vienna, Austria
[2] Paracelsus Med Privatuniv, Inst Allgemein Familien & Praventivmed, Salzburg, Austria
[3] Med Univ Graz, Inst Sozialmed, Graz, Austria
[4] Med Univ Graz, Inst Allgemeinmed & Evidenzbasierte Versorgungsfor, Graz, Austria
[5] Med Univ Graz, Inst Gen Med & Evidence Based Hlth Serv Res, Auenbruggerpl 2-9, A-8036 Graz, Austria
关键词
multidisciplinary care team; primary care physicians; general practice; workforce; primary health care; public health systems research; WORKFORCE; TEAMS;
D O I
10.1055/a-2011-5362
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background Recent reforms in Austria have focused on establishing team-based care within multiprofessional primary care units, to enhance amongst others, the work attractiveness of general practice. Nearly 75% of qualified general practitioners are not working as contracted physicians with the social health insurance. This study aims to explore the facilitators of and barriers to non-contracted general practitioners to work in a primary care unit.Methods We conducted twelve semi-structured, problem-centered interviews among purposively sampled non-contracted general practitioners. To extract categories of facilitators and barriers for working in a primary care unit, transcribed interviews were inductively coded using qualitative content analysis. Subcategories were grouped into factors (facilitators and barriers) of thematic criteria and mapped on the macro-, meso-, micro-, and individual levels.Results We identified 41 categories, including 21 facilitators and 20 barriers. Most facilitators were located at the micro-level, while most barriers were located at the macro-level. Teamwork and associated conditions made primary care units attractive as workplaces and corresponded with individual demands. In contrast, system factors tended to reduce the attractiveness of working as a general practitioner.Conclusions Multifaceted efforts are needed to address relevant factors at all of the levels mentioned above. These need to be carried out and consistently communicated by all stakeholders. Efforts to strengthen the holistic approach in primary care, like modern remuneration and patient steering mechanisms, are essential. Financial support, consulting services as well as training on entrepreneurship, management, leadership, and team-based care may help to reduce the risk and burden of founding and running a primary care unit.
引用
收藏
页码:E32 / E41
页数:10
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [21] Policy failure and the policy-implementation gap: can policy support programs help?
    Hudson, Bob
    Hunter, David
    Peckham, Stephen
    [J]. POLICY DESIGN AND PRACTICE, 2019, 2 (01) : 1 - 14
  • [22] Janus K., 2014, GUTACHTEN GESTALTUNG
  • [23] Kaiser A., 2015, FORDERNDE HEMMENDE M
  • [24] Kringos D.S., 2015, Building Primary Care in a Changing Europe
  • [25] PACES: a national leadership program in support of primary-care reform in Portugal
    Lapao, Luis Velez
    Dussault, Gilles
    [J]. LEADERSHIP IN HEALTH SERVICES, 2011, 24 (04) : 295 - 307
  • [26] Which positive factors give general practitioners job satisfaction and make general practice a rewarding career? A European multicentric qualitative research by the European general practice research network
    Le Floch, B.
    Bastiaens, H.
    Le Reste, J. Y.
    Lingner, H.
    Hoffman, R.
    Czachowski, S.
    Assenova, R.
    Koskela, T. H.
    Klemenc-Ketis, Z.
    Nabbe, P.
    Sowinska, A.
    Montier, T.
    Peremans, L.
    [J]. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE, 2019, 20 (01)
  • [27] Linde K., 2020, GESUNDHEITSWESEN, V150, P96
  • [28] Mayring P., 2015, Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Grundlagen und Techniken
  • [29] Miles M. B, 2014, Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook 1994
  • [30] Mugambwa J., 2018, Journal of Public Administration and Governance, V8, P211, DOI DOI 10.5296/JPAG.V8I3.13609