Comparative Study of Complications Associated with Coblation Versus Conventional Tonsillectomy

被引:0
作者
Chaudhary, Kanchan [1 ]
Singh, Vishwambhar [3 ]
Yadav, Ramraj [2 ]
Chaudhary, Ashvanee Kumar [4 ]
Kumar, Rajesh [2 ]
Gupta, Deepak Kumar [4 ]
Verma, Jyoti Kumar [4 ]
机构
[1] Govt Med Coll & Super Facil Hosp, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Azamgarh, India
[2] Banaras Hindu Univ, Inst Med Sci, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India
[3] All India Inst Med Sci, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Patna, Bihar, India
[4] Narayan Med Coll & Hosp, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Sasaram, Bihar, India
关键词
Tonsillectomy; Coblation; Conventional cold steel; Primary hemorrhage; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; CHILDREN; DISSECTION; MORBIDITY; PAIN;
D O I
10.1007/s12070-023-03872-5
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Tonsillectomy is one of the most common ear, nose and throat surgical procedure, carried out worldwide(1). Amongst the various method of tonsillectomy (diathermy, laser, harmonic scalpel, radiofrequency cautery cryosurgery and coblation), dissection and snare method is commonest procedure done by otorhinolaryngologist. To compare the post operative complications associated with coblation versus conventional cold-dissection steel tonsillectomy. We carried out the prospective study of complications associated with coblation versus conventional cold steel tonsillectomy in postoperative pain, anesthesia, hemorrhage, fever, pharyngitis, injury of adjacent structure & cautery burn. Average blood loss on Coblation side was 18.74 ml while on conventional side it was 44.2 ml. Post operative pain score, injury to adjacent structure and cautery burn were found to be significantly decreased in coblation. No such difference was observed in pharyngitis and fever in both methods. The use of coblator reduces the post-operative pain, peri or post-operative blood loss, injury to adjacent structure & cautery burn too.
引用
收藏
页码:2870 / 2877
页数:8
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Bhattacharya N., 2014, OTOLARYNGOL NECK SUR, V151, P1055, DOI [10.1177/0194599814552647, DOI 10.1177/0194599814552647]
  • [2] Tonsillectomy in Children: A Five-Factor Analysis Among Three Techniques-Reporting Upon Clinical Results, Anesthesia Time, Surgery Time, Bleeding, and Cost
    D'Eredita, Riccardo
    [J]. LARYNGOSCOPE, 2010, 120 (12) : 2502 - 2507
  • [3] Molecular Resonance vs. Coblation Tonsillectomy in Children
    D'Eredita, Riccardo
    Bozzola, Loredana
    [J]. LARYNGOSCOPE, 2009, 119 (10) : 1897 - 1901
  • [4] Radiofrequency tonsil reduction: Safety, morbidity, and efficacy
    Friedman, M
    LoSavio, P
    Ibrahim, H
    Ramakrishnan, V
    [J]. LARYNGOSCOPE, 2003, 113 (05) : 882 - 887
  • [5] Hong, 2013, COBLATION TONSILLECT, P22
  • [6] Coblation vs. Electrocautery Tonsillectomy: A Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Clinical Outcomes in Adolescents and Adults
    Hong, Sung-Moon
    Cho, Jae-Gu
    Chae, Sung Won
    Lee, Heung-Man
    Woo, Jeong-Soo
    [J]. CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2013, 6 (02) : 90 - 93
  • [7] Martin, 2013, OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, V1998, P47
  • [8] A pilot randomized controlled trial of coblation tonsillectomy versus dissection tonsillectomy with bipolar diathermy haemostasis
    Mitic, S.
    Tvinnereim, M.
    Lie, E.
    Saltyte, B. J.
    [J]. CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2007, 32 (04) : 261 - 267
  • [9] 김남국, 2013, [Korean Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, 대한이비인후과학회지 두경부외과학], V56, P773, DOI 10.3342/kjorl-hns.2013.56.12.773
  • [10] Omrani M, 2012, J RES MED SCI, V17, P45