Identifying candidate quality indicators of tools that support the practice of knowledge translation: a scoping review protocol

被引:2
作者
Bhuiya, Aunima R. [1 ]
Makarski, Julie [2 ]
Hayden, Leigh [3 ]
Perrier, Laure [4 ]
Munce, Sarah [5 ]
Lewis, Iveta [2 ]
Graham, Ian D. [6 ,7 ]
Holroyd-Leduc, Jayna [8 ,9 ]
Straus, Sharon E. [10 ,11 ]
Stelfox, Henry T. [12 ,13 ,14 ]
Strifler, Lisa [1 ,10 ]
Lokker, Cynthia [15 ]
Li, Linda C. [16 ]
Leung, Fok-Han [17 ]
Dobbins, Maureen
Ritchie, Lisa M. Puchalski [1 ,5 ,10 ,11 ]
Squires, Janet
Rac, Valeria [1 ,5 ]
Fahim, Christine [1 ,10 ]
Kastner, Monika [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Inst Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat IHPME, Dalla Lana Sch Publ Hlth, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] North York Gen Hosp, Res & Innovat, N York, ON, Canada
[3] Sheridan Coll, Ctr Elder Res, Oakville, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Univ Toronto Lib, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Hlth Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] Univ Ottawa, Sch Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[7] Ottawa Hosp Res Inst, Clin Epidemiol Program, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[8] Univ Calgary, Cumming Sch Med, Dept Med, Calgary, AB, Canada
[9] Univ Calgary, Cumming Sch Med, Dept Community Hlth Sci, Calgary, AB, Canada
[10] McMaster Univ, Sch Nursing, Unity Hlth, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[11] Univ Ottawa, Fac Hlth Sci, Sch Nursing, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[12] Univ Hlth Network, Toronto Gen Hosp Res Inst, Program Hlth Syst & Technol Evaluat, Calgary, ON, Canada
[13] Univ Calgary, OBrien Inst Publ Hlth, Ted Rogers Ctr Heart Res, Peter Munk Cardiac Ctr, Calgary, AB, Canada
[14] Alberta Hlth Serv, Calgary, AB, Canada
[15] McMaster Univ, Dept Hlth Res Methods Evidence & Impact, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[16] Univ British Columbia, Dept Phys Therapy, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[17] St Michaels Hosp, Unity Hlth, Tornoto, ON, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
implementation science; knowledge translation tools; knowledge user needs; translational medical research; CARE;
D O I
10.11124/JBIES-22-00055
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The objective of this scoping review is to identify and characterize relevant knowledge translation methods tools (those that provide guidance for optimized knowledge translation practice) to uncover candidate quality indicators to inform a future quality assessment tool for knowledge translation strategies.Introduction: Knowledge translation strategies (defined as including knowledge translation interventions, tools, and products) target various knowledge users, including patients, clinicians, researchers, and policy-makers. The development and use of strategies that support knowledge translation practice have been rapidly increasing, making it difficult for knowledge users to decide which to use. There is limited evidence-based guidance or measures to help assess the overall quality of knowledge translation strategies.Inclusion criteria: Empirical and non-empirical documents will be considered if they explicitly describe a knowledge translation methods tool and its development, evaluation or validation, methodological strengths or limitations, and/or use over time. The review will consider a knowledge translation methods tool if it falls within at least one knowledge translation domain (ie, implementation, dissemination, sustainability, scalability, integrated knowledge translation) in the health field.Methods: We will conduct a systematic search of relevant electronic databases and gray literature. The search strategy will be developed iteratively by an experienced medical information specialist and peer-reviewed with the PRESS checklist. The search will be limited to English-only documents published from 2005 onward. Documents will be independently screened, selected, and extracted by 2 researchers. Data will be analyzed and summarized descriptively, including the characteristics of the included documents, knowledge translation methods tools, and candidate quality indicators.
引用
收藏
页码:264 / 278
页数:15
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Advancing a Conceptual Model of Evidence-Based Practice Implementation in Public Service Sectors
    Aarons, Gregory A.
    Hurlburt, Michael
    Horwitz, Sarah McCue
    [J]. ADMINISTRATION AND POLICY IN MENTAL HEALTH AND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2011, 38 (01) : 4 - 23
  • [2] The NASSS framework for ex post theorisation of technology-supported change in healthcare: worked example of the TORPEDO programme
    Abimbola, Seye
    Patel, Bindu
    Peiris, David
    Patel, Anushka
    Harris, Mark
    Usherwood, Tim
    Greenhalgh, Trisha
    [J]. BMC MEDICINE, 2019, 17 (01)
  • [3] Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health, 2015, Grey matters: a practical tool for searching health-related grey literature
  • [4] Canadian Institutes of Health Research, 2012, GUID KNOWL TRANSL PL
  • [5] The dynamic sustainability framework: addressing the paradox of sustainment amid ongoing change
    Chambers, David A.
    Glasgow, Russell E.
    Stange, Kurt C.
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2013, 8
  • [6] A framework of the desirable features of guideline implementation tools (GItools): Delphi survey and assessment of GItools
    Gagliardi, Anna R.
    Brouwers, Melissa C.
    Bhattacharyya, Onil K.
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2014, 9
  • [7] Research waste is still a scandal-an essay by Paul Glasziou and Iain Chalmers
    Glasziou, Paul
    Chalmers, Iain
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2018, 363
  • [8] Lost in knowledge translation: Time for a map?
    Graham, ID
    Logan, J
    Harrison, MB
    Straus, SE
    Tetroe, J
    Caswell, W
    Robinson, N
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONTINUING EDUCATION IN THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2006, 26 (01) : 13 - 24
  • [9] Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique
    Hasson, F
    Keeney, S
    McKenna, H
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2000, 32 (04) : 1008 - 1015
  • [10] Defining Integrated Knowledge Translation and Moving Forward: A Response to Recent Commentaries
    Kothari, Anita
    McCutcheon, Chris
    Graham, Ian D.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLICY AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 6 (05): : 299 - +