Three-Dimensional Quantification of Postoperative Facial Asymmetry in Patients With Unilateral Cleft lip and Palate Using Facial Symmetry Plane

被引:2
作者
Shiigi, Ayano [1 ]
Okawachi, Takako [1 ]
Kamiya, Tohru [2 ]
Hosoki, Daisuke [2 ]
Nomoto, Namiko [3 ]
Ratman, Mohamad Farid [1 ,4 ]
Amir, Muhammad Subhan [5 ]
Ishihata, Kiyohide [3 ]
Nakamura, Norifumi [1 ]
机构
[1] Kagoshima Univ, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Field Maxillofacial Rehabil, Grad Sch Med & Dent Sci, 8-35-1 Sakuragaoka, Kagoshima 8908544, Japan
[2] Kyushu Inst Technol, Fac Engn, Dept Mech & Control Engn, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, Japan
[3] Kagoshima Univ Hosp, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Kagoshima, Japan
[4] Indonesia Univ, Fac Dent Med, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Depok, Indonesia
[5] Airlangga Univ, Fac Dent Med, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Surabaya, Indonesia
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
cleft lip and palate; 3D assessment; facial symmetry plane; NASOLABIAL APPEARANCE; NASAL SYMMETRY; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1177/10556656221123276
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective To quantitatively assess three-dimensional (3D) soft tissue facial asymmetry in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) who have undergone primary lip repair. Design Clinical, retrospective, comparative, methodological study. Patients/Participants Twenty patients with UCLP were selected after a review of the records. Inclusion Criteria Complete UCLP; surgically treated without secondary repair. An age-matched and sex-matched Control group was employed. Main Outcome Measures A 3D facial symmetry plane (FSP) was obtained by superimposing the point clouds of the original 3D facial image excluding the surgical site and including lip and nose areas and those of a mirrored facial image using the iterative closest point (ICP) adjustment method. The discrepancies in the depth and angle of the normal vector of the facial surface of each point cloud between right and left sides (cleft and non-cleft sides in the UCLP group, respectively) based on FSP were calculated. Results Facial asymmetry in the UCLP group was significantly greater than in the Control group regarding both the discrepancies in the depth (1.34 +/- 0.62, 0.73 +/- 0.32 pixels, respectively) (P = .0004) and surface angle (18.0 +/- 5.88, 12.8 +/- 4.0 degrees, respectively) (P = .0024). Biaxial assessment of the discrepancies in the depth and surface angle allowed us to visually extract UCLP patients with greater facial asymmetry. Conclusions Facial asymmetry analysis based on 3D FSP effectively facilitates the facial asymmetry quantification and soft tissue surgical outcome evaluation in patients with UCLP.
引用
收藏
页码:209 / 218
页数:10
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Reliability of Americleft Yardstick Nasolabial Appearance Assessment With/Without Basal View for Japanese Children With Unilateral Complete Cleft Lip and Palate [J].
Amir, Muhammad Subhan ;
Fuchigami, Takao ;
Kibe, Toshiro ;
Tezuka, Masahiro ;
Ishihata, Kiyohide ;
Nakamura, Norifumi .
CLEFT PALATE-CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL, 2019, 56 (07) :953-959
[2]  
ASHERMCDADE C, 1991, CLEFT PALATE-CRAN J, V28, P385, DOI 10.1597/1545-1569(1991)028<0385:DOAMFR>2.3.CO
[3]  
2
[4]   Three-Dimensional Assessment of Facial Appearance Following Surgical Repair of Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate [J].
Bell, Alieen ;
Lo, Tsz-Wai Rachel ;
Brown, Denise ;
Bowman, Adrian W. ;
Siebert, J. Paul ;
Simmons, David R. ;
Millett, Declan T. ;
Ayoub, Ashraf F. .
CLEFT PALATE-CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL, 2014, 51 (04) :462-471
[5]   A METHOD FOR REGISTRATION OF 3-D SHAPES [J].
BESL, PJ ;
MCKAY, ND .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 1992, 14 (02) :239-256
[6]   A COMPUTER-AIDED METHOD OF MEASURING NASAL SYMMETRY IN THE CLEFT-LIP NOSE [J].
COGHLAN, BA ;
LAITUNG, JKG ;
PIGOTT, RW .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 1993, 46 (01) :13-17
[7]   The Use of Facial Anthropometrics in Aesthetic Assessment [J].
Edler, R. ;
Abd Rahim, M. ;
Wertheim, D. ;
Greenhill, D. .
CLEFT PALATE-CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL, 2010, 47 (01) :48-57
[8]  
FARKAS LG, 1993, CLEFT PALATE-CRAN J, V30, P1, DOI 10.1597/1545-1569(1993)030<0001:AAAFOT>2.3.CO
[9]  
2
[10]  
Hosoki D, 2020, INT C CONTR AUTOMAT, P402, DOI [10.23919/iccas50221.2020.9268262, 10.23919/ICCAS50221.2020.9268262]