Sensitivity assessment of value-added products and pellet production in alternatives for softwood sawdust valorization

被引:3
作者
Clauser, Nicolas M. [1 ]
Gutierrez, M. Soledad [2 ]
Felissia, Fernando E. [1 ]
Cristina Area, M. [1 ]
Vallejos, Maria E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Consejo Nacl Invest Cient & Tecn, FCEQYN, Programa Celulosa & Papel PROCyP, IMAM, UNaMFelix Azara 1552, RA-3300 Posadas, Misiones, Argentina
[2] Univ Republ UdelaR, Fac Ingn, Montevideo, Uruguay
关键词
Biorefinery; Techno-economic assessment; Sensitivity assessment; Multi-product; LEVULINIC ACID; PINE SAWDUST; LIGNOCELLULOSIC BIOMASS; BIOREFINERIES; OPTIMIZATION; EXTRACTION; EXPLOSION; RECOVERY; STRATEGY;
D O I
10.1007/s13399-022-02972-6
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The study involves alternatives for pine sawdust valorization. It includes pellet production as the base case and two biorefinery schemes to produce levulinic acid (LA) and its by-products (furfural and formic acid). The studied scenarios consider an annual capacity of 100,000 of dry sawdust. In scenario I, 108 kt per year of pellets could be obtained with an investment of USD 9.5 million and USD 19.7 million of net present value (NPV). In scenario II, the production of 17.6 kt year(-1) of pellets and 5.72 kt year of LA and its by-products requires an investment of USD 52.7 million (NPV about USD 5.6 million). In scenario III, 16.3 kt year(-1) of LA and derived products could be obtained with USD 54.5 million investment (NPV about USD 60 million). Pellet price and sawdust availability are the most critical variables in scenario I. Scenarios II and III show that the most significant variables are the conversion yield and sugar concentration in the acid catalysis, LA price, and sawdust availability. Besides, a sensitivity analysis was developed, varying more than one variable at a time in all scenarios. In scenario III, NPV values can be higher than USD 180 million.
引用
收藏
页码:6659 / 6669
页数:11
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
Abbati C, 2019, THESIS N CAROLINA ST
[2]  
Alibaba, 2020, INT PRIC
[3]  
Batsy DR, 2013, GREEN CHEM CHEM ENG, P3
[4]   A Framework for Defining the Economic Feasibility of Cellulosic Biofuel Pathways [J].
Brown, Tristan R. ;
Wright, Mark M. .
BIOFUELS-UK, 2014, 5 (05) :579-590
[5]  
Chen M., 2016, BIOPRODUCTS BUS, V1, P42
[6]   A framework for the design and analysis of integrated multi-product biorefineries from agricultural and forestry wastes [J].
Clauser, Nicolas M. ;
Felissia, Fernando E. ;
Area, Maria C. ;
Vallejos, Maria E. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2021, 139
[7]   An energy-saving re-use strategy for the treatment of lignocellulosic biomass applied to the production of levulinc acid [J].
Clauser, Nicolas M. ;
Felissia, Fernando E. ;
Area, Maria C. ;
Vallejos, Maria E. ;
Gutierrez, Soledad .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 257
[8]   Techno-economic assessment of carboxylic acids, furfural, and pellet production in a pine sawdust biorefinery [J].
Clauser, Nicolas M. ;
Gutierrez, Soledad ;
Area, Maria C. ;
Felissia, Fernando E. ;
Vallejos, Maria E. .
BIOFUELS BIOPRODUCTS & BIOREFINING-BIOFPR, 2018, 12 (06) :997-1012
[9]   Alternatives of Small-Scale Biorefineries for the Integrated Production of Xylitol from Sugarcane Bagasse [J].
Clauser, Nicolas M. ;
Gutierrez, Soledad ;
Area, Maria C. ;
Felissia, Fernando E. ;
Vallejos, Maria E. .
JOURNAL OF RENEWABLE MATERIALS, 2018, 6 (02) :139-151
[10]   Small-sized biorefineries as strategy to add value to sugarcane bagasse [J].
Clauser, Nicolas M. ;
Gutierrez, Soledad ;
Area, Maria C. ;
Felissiaa, Fernando E. ;
Vallejos, Maria E. .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH & DESIGN, 2016, 107 :137-146