Alternative finance in bank-firm relationship: how does board structure affect the cost of debt?

被引:2
|
作者
Palmieri, Egidio [1 ,2 ]
Geretto, Enrico F. [1 ]
Polato, Maurizio [1 ]
Miani, Stefano [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Udine, Dept Econ & Stat, Via Tomadini 30-A, I-33100 Udine, Italy
[2] Bangor Business Sch, Coll Rd, Bangor LL57 2DG, Wales
关键词
Alternative finance; Corporate governance; Board structure; Cost of debt; Fintech; G32; G21; G34; G20; O16; CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; FEMALE DIRECTORS; GENDER DIVERSITY; SPECIFICATION; PERFORMANCE; MATTER; RISK;
D O I
10.1007/s10997-024-09700-4
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
In this paper, we examine the relationship between alternative finance and board structure on the cost of debt for firms, focusing on the unique effects of differing board characteristics. Using a dataset of 176 European listed companies observed annually from 2013 to 2022, we dissect this relationship through several hypotheses considering factors such as the supply of alternative finance, board gender composition, age, expertise, and board turnover. Our findings reveal that increased alternative finance credit supply escalates the cost of debt, especially for firms with lower ESG scores. Firms with young boards, boards specialized in economics or low, and board turnover also experience a rise in borrowing costs with increasing of alternative finance. Through a pooling 2SLS model, we provide robust evidence about the interplay of alternative finance and varying board structures on the cost of debt. This research clarifies the intricacies of bank-firm relationships in alternative finance and holds significant implications for supervisory authorities, banks, and policymakers. It underscores the necessity of good corporate governance in managing the cost implications of alternative finance. It calls for tailored risk assessment strategies, conducive regulatory frameworks, and vigilant supervisory approaches to create a resilient financial ecosystem where alternative finance can thrive without inordinately inflating the cost of debt.
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 143
页数:33
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Does board diversity affect the cost of debt financing? Empirical evidence from Turkey
    Aksoy, Mine
    Yilmaz, Mustafa Kemal
    GENDER IN MANAGEMENT, 2023, 38 (04): : 504 - 524
  • [2] Board Gender Diversity and Cost of Debt: Does Firm Size and Industry type matter?
    Kamil, Rabiatu
    Appiah, Kingsley Opoku
    GENDER IN MANAGEMENT, 2022, 37 (01): : 19 - 38
  • [3] How does bank ownership affect firm investment? Evidence from China
    Wang, Hongjian
    Luo, Tianpei
    Tian, Gary Gang
    Yan, Huanmin
    JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2020, 113
  • [4] How does managerial opportunism affect the cost of debt financing?
    Ghouma, Hatem
    RESEARCH IN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AND FINANCE, 2017, 39 : 13 - 29
  • [5] How Does Firm Life Cycle Affect Board Structure? Evidence from China's Listed Privately Owned Enterprises
    Li, Yunhe
    Zhang, Xiaotian Tina
    MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION REVIEW, 2018, 14 (02) : 305 - 341
  • [6] Does tax aggressiveness and cost of debt affect firm performance? The moderating role of political connections
    Abdullah
    Hashmi, Muhammad Arsalan
    Mateen, Abdul
    Badshah, Yousuf Ali
    Iqbal, Muhammad Sikander
    COGENT ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2022, 10 (01):
  • [7] How does ownership structure affect the financing and dividend decisions of firm?
    Tayachi, Tahar
    Hunjra, Ahmed Imran
    Jones, Kirsten
    Mehmood, Rashid
    Al-Faryan, Mamdouh Abdulaziz Saleh
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL REPORTING AND ACCOUNTING, 2023, 21 (03) : 729 - 746
  • [8] How does the CEO horizon problem affect the cost of bank loans?
    Wang, Yangmei
    Guo, Savannah
    ADVANCES IN ACCOUNTING, 2025, 68
  • [9] How does subordinated debt affect the cost of capital for banks?
    Yusifzada, Leyla
    PACIFIC-BASIN FINANCE JOURNAL, 2025, 91
  • [10] How does a firm's life cycle influence the relationship between carbon performance and financial debt?
    Tascon, Maria T.
    Castro, Paula
    Ferreras, Adrian
    BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 30 (04) : 1879 - 1897