Image processing and machine learning for diagnosis and screening of craniosynostosis in children

被引:3
作者
Sabeti, Maliheh [1 ]
Boostani, Reza [2 ]
Taheri, Behnam [1 ]
Moradi, Ehsan [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Islamic Azad Univ, Dept Comp Engn, North Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran
[2] Shiraz Univ, Fac Elect & Comp Engn, CSE & IT Dept, Shiraz, Iran
[3] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Dept Neurosurg, Tehran, Iran
[4] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Res Inst Childrens Hlth, Pediat Surg Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
来源
INTERDISCIPLINARY NEUROSURGERY-ADVANCED TECHNIQUES AND CASE MANAGEMENT | 2024年 / 36卷
关键词
Craniosynostosis; Deep learning neural network; Cranial indices; NON-SYNDROMIC CRANIOSYNOSTOSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.inat.2023.101887
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: craniosynostosis (CSO) is a congenital disorder resulting from early closure of cranial sutures in newborns, while could cause significant cosmetic and neurodevelopmental problems. As a standard method, different craniometric indices are measured directly from child head or from their 3D CT scan of skull for diagnosis or in post-operative follow-up period. We propose a novel telehealth-compatible deep learning neural network-based method for identifying different craniometric indices in non-syndromic CSO patients 2D photo-graphic data.Methods: 624 pre-operative and post-operative top-down cranial digital images of 145 craniosynostotic infants (59 sagittal, 55 metopic and 31 unicoronal synostosis) who had surgery at Mofid Children's Hospital, Tehran, Iran were used in a deep learning neural network algorithm. Head boundary was defined by a faster region-based convolutional neural network (Faster R-CNN) and then different cranial indices (cranial index (CI), cranial vault asymmetry index (CVAI), anterior-posterior width ratio (APWR), anterior-midline width ratio (AMWR) and left-right height ratio (LRHR)) were calculated from segmented images. Accuracy, sensitivity and specificity were calculated for software versus specialist data association between cranial indices were evaluated with inter-class correlation coefficients.Results: The head border was segmented in the proposed images with accuracy of 88.67 +/- 1.94 in comparison with standard hand made procedure with a sensitivity of 86.91 +/- 3.75 and specificity of 88.60 +/- 4.81. Among calculated cranial indices, significant decrease in CI value is most useful for diagnosis of sagittal synostosis (CIsagittal= 71.97 +/- 4.33), significant increase in CVAI value and significant decrease in LRHR value is most appropriate for unicoronal suture synostosis diagnosis (CVAIunicoronal= 6.79 +/- 3.80 and LRHRunicoronal = 0.91 +/- 0.05) and significant decrease in APWR and AMWR values could be indicator of metopic synostosis (AMWRmetopic = 0.77 +/- 0.04 and APWRmatopic = 0.83 +/- 0.05). Conclusion: Deep learning neural network algorithms could have high levels of capability in calculating cranial indices from routine 2D digital images of non-syndromic craniosynostotic children and act as a substitute for optical scanner or 3D CT-based craniometrics. This method could act as a corner stone for developing a software for a mobile platform that that would allow for screening by tele-medicine or in a primary care setting.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2021, MATLAB
[2]  
Blokdyk G, 2021, Objet detection A Complete Guide
[3]   Image processing and machine learning for telehealth craniosynostosis screening in newborns [J].
Bookland, Markus J. ;
Ahn, Edward S. ;
Stoltz, Petronella ;
Martin, Jonathan E. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-PEDIATRICS, 2021, 27 (05) :581-588
[4]   The Evolution of the Role of Imaging in the Diagnosis of Craniosynostosis: A Narrative Review [J].
Cacciaguerra, Giovanni ;
Palermo, Monica ;
Marino, Lidia ;
Rapisarda, Filippo Andrea Salvatore ;
Pavone, Piero ;
Falsaperla, Raffaele ;
Ruggieri, Martino ;
Marino, Silvia .
CHILDREN-BASEL, 2021, 8 (09)
[5]  
Cyganek B, 2013, OBJECT DETECTION AND RECOGNITION IN DIGITAL IMAGES: THEORY AND PRACTICE, P1, DOI 10.1002/9781118618387
[6]   Combining deep learning with 3D stereophotogrammetry for craniosynostosis diagnosis [J].
de Jong, Guido ;
Bijlsma, Elmar ;
Meulstee, Jene ;
Wennen, Myrte ;
van Lindert, Erik ;
Maal, Thomas ;
Aquarius, Rene ;
Delye, Hans .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
[7]  
Dudzik B, 2016, BIOLOGICAL DISTANCE ANALYSIS: FORENSIC AND BIOARCHAEOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES, P35, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-801966-5.00003-2
[8]   Evidence-Based Medicine: Craniosynostosis [J].
Fearon, Jeffrey A. .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2014, 133 (05) :1261-1275
[9]   Non-syndromic craniosynostosis in children: Scoping review [J].
Garrocho-Rangel, Arturo ;
Manriquez-Olmos, Lizeth ;
Flores-Velazquez, Joselin ;
Rosales-Berber, Miguel-Angel ;
Martinez-Rider, Ricardo ;
Pozos-Guillen, Amaury .
MEDICINA ORAL PATOLOGIA ORAL Y CIRUGIA BUCAL, 2018, 23 (04) :E421-E428
[10]   Fast R-CNN [J].
Girshick, Ross .
2015 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION (ICCV), 2015, :1440-1448