What the pandemic and its impact on the mobility and well-being of older people can teach us about age-friendly cities and communities

被引:4
作者
Naughton, Linda [1 ,2 ]
Cunha, Francisco [1 ]
Padeiro, Miguel [1 ]
Santana, Paula [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
[2] Univ Coimbra, Fac Arts & Humanities, Ctr Studies Geog & Spatial Planning CEGOT, Dept Geog & Tourism,Colegio Sao Jeronimo, P-3004530 Coimbra, Portugal
关键词
COVID-19; Older adults; Age-friendly cities and communities; World Health Organization; New mobilities; SELF-PERCEPTIONS; GEOGRAPHIES; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116329
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
From the start of the pandemic, questions were raised concerning how the pandemic could change or even transform relationships to our living environments. COVID-19 has had a disproportionate impact on the health and well-being of older people due to the increased risk of severity of the disease with both advancing age and associated co-morbidities. Restrictions on the movement of older people have also been more severe, with many countries imposing restrictions based on chronological age. In Portugal, confinement measures were targeted at older persons in terms of sheltering-at-home orders for those over 70. This paper looks at the impact of these restrictions on the lives of older people and asks what we can learn from the pandemic about the concept of age friendly cities (WHO, 2007a). We look at the lived experience of older people to understand how their well-being and mobility were impacted during the crisis and its aftermath. The study was undertaken in four urban areas: Aveiro, Coimbra, Lisbon, and Faro. Data was collected using semi-structured interviews analysed using a process of thematic coding based on the eight pillars of the WHO's Age-Friendly City Checklist (WHO, 2007b). The results are discussed using conceptualisations from the new mobilities paradigm: existential mobility, connection and (im)mobility governance, offering new ways of thinking about age-friendliness in and out of crisis.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]  
Ahmed S, 2014, CULTURAL POLITICS OF EMOTION, 2ND EDITION, P82
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Working with Older People, DOI DOI 10.1108/WWOP-12-2016-0038
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Checklist of Essential Features of Age-friendly Cities
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2018, The Global Network for Age-friendly Cities and Communities: Looking back over the last decade, looking forward to the next
[5]   Updating the Evidence for Physical Activity: Summative Reviews of the Epidemiological Evidence, Prevalence, and Interventions to Promote "Active Aging" [J].
Bauman, Adrian ;
Merom, Dafna ;
Bull, Fiona C. ;
Buchner, David M. ;
Singh, Maria A. Fiatarone .
GERONTOLOGIST, 2016, 56 :S268-S280
[6]  
Bauman Zygmunt, 2000, Liquid modernity
[7]  
Braun V., 2006, Qualitative Research in Psychology, V3, P77, DOI [10.1191/1478088706qp063oa, DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA, DOI 10.1080/10875549.2021.1929659, https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa]
[8]  
British Society of Gerontology, 2020, BSG STAT COVID 19
[9]   A Manifesto for the Age-Friendly Movement: Developing a New Urban Agenda [J].
Buffel, Tine ;
Phillipson, Chris .
JOURNAL OF AGING & SOCIAL POLICY, 2018, 30 (02) :173-192
[10]   Ageing in urban environments: Developing 'age-friendly' cities [J].
Buffel, Tine ;
Phillipson, Chris ;
Scharf, Thomas .
CRITICAL SOCIAL POLICY, 2012, 32 (04) :597-617