What have we learned about constructed response short-answer questions from students and faculty? A multi-institutional study

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to enrich understanding about the perceived benefits and drawbacks of constructed response short-answer questions (CR-SAQs) in preclerkship assessment using Norcini's criteria for good assessment as a framework.MethodsThis multi-institutional study surveyed students and faculty at three institutions. A survey using Likert scale and open-ended questions was developed to evaluate faculty and student perceptions of CR-SAQs using the criteria of good assessment to determine the benefits and drawbacks . Descriptive statistics and Chi-square analyses are presented, and open responses were analyzed using directed content analysis to describe benefits and drawbacks of CR-SAQs.ResultsA total of 260 students (19%) and 57 faculty (48%) completed the survey. Students and faculty report that the benefits of CR-SAQs are authenticity, deeper learning (educational effect), and receiving feedback (catalytic effect). Drawbacks included feasibility, construct validity, and scoring reproducibility. Students and faculty found CR-SAQs to be both acceptable (can show your reasoning, partial credit) and unacceptable (stressful, not USMLE format).ConclusionsCR-SAQs are a method of aligning innovative curricula with assessment and could enrich the assessment toolkit for medical educators.