Teacher Instructional Approaches and Student Engagement and Behavioral Responses During Literacy Instruction in a Juvenile Correctional Facility

被引:1
作者
Gagnon, Joseph Calvin [1 ,7 ]
Gurel, Sungur [2 ]
Barber, Brian R. [3 ]
Houchins, David E. [4 ]
Lane, Holly B. [5 ]
Mccray, Erica D. [5 ]
Lambert, Richard G. [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
[2] Siirt Univ, Siirt, Turkiye
[3] Kent State Univ, Kent, OH USA
[4] Georgia State Univ, Atlanta, GA USA
[5] Univ Florida, Gainesville, FL USA
[6] Univ North Carolina Charlotte, Charlotte, NC USA
[7] Univ Helsinki, Fac Educ Sci, PL 9 Siltavuorenpenger 5A, Helsinki 00014, Finland
关键词
juvenile justice; teacher-student interactions; student engagement; TRANSACTIONAL MODELS; PERFORMANCE FEEDBACK; CLASSROOM-BEHAVIOR; INCARCERATED YOUTH; VARYING RATES; PRAISE; OPPORTUNITIES; STRATEGIES; SCHOOL; DISABILITIES;
D O I
10.1177/10634266241231976
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
To address instructional challenges and poor academic outcomes of youth in juvenile correctional facilities (JCFs), we must understand how and why some teachers are effective and why students are responsive to instruction in these settings. We observed and coded teacher-student instructional interactions from 733 fifteen-minute classroom reading sessions for seven teachers and 40 students in a secure JCF school. We then applied a series of time-window sequential analytic procedures to assess connections between instructional approaches and teacher behaviors, and contingent student engagement and response behaviors. We also compared contingent probabilities for students with disabilities and students without disabilities. Across all students, our observations were characterized by larger proportions of passive student engagement. We also found a relatively low use of teacher praise. When teachers provided either directives or opportunities to respond, conditional probabilities for appropriate student responses were higher across students, particularly when directives were provided to students with disabilities. We discuss additional results and implications for research and practice.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 53
页数:15
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]   A Comparison of Three Opportunity-to-Respond Strategies on the Academic Engaged Time Among High School Students Who Present Challenging Behavior [J].
Adamson, Reesha M. ;
Lewis, Timothy J. .
BEHAVIORAL DISORDERS, 2017, 42 (02) :41-51
[2]  
American Psychiatric Association, 2013, DIAGN STAT MAN MENT, DOI 10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, BREAKING SCH TO PRIS
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Reforming juvenile justice: A developmental approach
[5]  
Atkinson P., 1994, Handbook of Qualitative Research, P248
[6]  
Bakeman R., 1997, Observing Interaction: An Introduction to Sequential Analysis
[7]  
Bakeman R., 1995, Analyzing interaction: Sequential analysis with SDIS and GSEQ
[8]  
Barber B. R., 2020, LITERACY INSTRUCTION, P209
[9]   An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-regression Analysis: Mental Disorders Among Adolescents in Juvenile Detention and Correctional Facilities [J].
Beaudry, Gabrielle ;
Yu, Rongqin ;
Langstrom, Niklas ;
Fazel, Seena .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2021, 60 (01) :46-60
[10]   Loud versus quiet praise: A direct behavioral comparison in secondary classrooms [J].
Blaze, John T. ;
Olmi, D. Joe ;
Mercer, Sterett H. ;
Dufrene, Brad A. ;
Tingstom, Daniel H. .
JOURNAL OF SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 52 (04) :349-360