Time reproduction, bisection and doubling: a novel paradigm to investigate the effect of the internal clock on time estimation

被引:5
作者
Momi, Davide [1 ]
Prete, Giulia [2 ]
Di Crosta, Adolfo [2 ]
La Malva, Pasquale [2 ]
Palumbo, Rocco [2 ]
Ceccato, Irene [3 ]
Bartolini, Emanuela [3 ]
Palumbo, Riccardo [3 ]
Mammarella, Nicola [2 ]
Fasolo, Mirco [3 ]
Di Domenico, Alberto [2 ]
机构
[1] Krembil Inst Neuroinformat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ G dAnnunzio, Dept Psychol Hlth & Territorial Sci, Chieti, Italy
[3] Univ G dAnnunzio, Dept Neurosci Imaging & Clin Sci, Chieti, Italy
来源
PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH-PSYCHOLOGISCHE FORSCHUNG | 2023年 / 87卷 / 05期
关键词
PERCEPTION; SPACE; REPRESENTATION; ATTENTION; CORTEX; MEMORY; HAND;
D O I
10.1007/s00426-022-01745-0
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Time perception is not always veridical, but it can be modulated by changes in internal and external context. The most-acknowledged theory in this regard hypothesises the existence of an internal clock allowing us to subjectively estimate time intervals. The aim of the present study is to investigate the possible effect of such an internal clock, measured as the ability to reproduce a target duration, in the mental manipulation of time: 63 healthy participants were asked to Bisect and to Double reference time intervals, besides Reproducing them. Moreover, to investigate whether time processing might be predicted by individual differences, handedness, anxiety, and personality traits were also assessed by means of standardized questionnaires. Results show that participants correctly Reproduce time intervals (internal clock), but they overestimate time intervals during Bisection and underestimate them during Doubling. We explain this unexpected pattern of results as a kind of aftereffect, due to the short-term retention (adaptation) to the subjective representation of shorter (Bisection) vs longer (Doubling) intervals, respectively. Moreover, hierarchic regression models reveal that some personality traits can predict Bisection accuracy, but they clearly show that the best predictor for both Bisection and Doubling is the accuracy in Reproducing time intervals, confirming the fundamental role of the internal clock in time estimation. We conclude that time estimation is a unique skill, mostly independent from inter-individual differences, and the new paradigms introduced here (bisection vs doubling) reveal that the correct functioning of the internal clock also explains the ability to mentally manipulate the time.
引用
收藏
页码:1549 / 1559
页数:11
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2013, QUALTRICS SURVEY SOF
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1999, The arguments of time
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1980, STAI QUESTIONARIO AU
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2011, BM SPSS STAT WIND VE
[5]   A New Perspective on the Relationships between Individual Factors and Time Estimates [J].
Bisson, Nicolas ;
Grondin, Simon .
TIMING & TIME PERCEPTION, 2020, 8 (01) :25-54
[6]   Time perception, attention, and memory: A selective review [J].
Block, Richard A. ;
Gruber, Ronald P. .
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2014, 149 :129-133
[7]   WHY IS THERE A LEFT SIDE UNDERESTIMATION IN ROD BISECTION [J].
BRADSHAW, JL ;
NATHAN, G ;
NETTLETON, NC ;
WILSON, L ;
PIERSON, J .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 1987, 25 (04) :735-738
[8]   Timing and neural encoding of somatosensory parametric working memory in macaque prefrontal cortex [J].
Brody, CD ;
Hernández, A ;
Zainos, A ;
Romo, R .
CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2003, 13 (11) :1196-1207
[9]   The biology of time across different scales [J].
Buonomano, Dean V. .
NATURE CHEMICAL BIOLOGY, 2007, 3 (10) :594-597
[10]   Explicit and implicit timing in older adults: Dissociable associations with age and cognitive decline [J].
Capizzi, Mariagrazia ;
Visalli, Antonino R. ;
Faralli, Alessio R. ;
Mioni, Giovanna R. .
PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (03)