Biology of the non-parasitic phase of the cattle tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus in an area of Amazon influence

被引:4
作者
Sales, Daniela P. [1 ]
Silva-Junior, Marcelo H. S. [2 ]
Tavares, Caio P. [2 ]
Sousa, Isabella C. [2 ]
Sousa, Dauana M. [2 ]
Brito, Danilo R. B. [3 ]
Camargo, Andre M. [3 ]
Leite, Romario Cerqueira [1 ]
Faccini, J. L. H. [4 ]
Lopes, Welber D. Z. [5 ]
Labruna, Marcelo B. [6 ]
Luz, Hermes R. [2 ,7 ]
Costa-Junior, Livio M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Estadual Maranhao, Postgrad Program Anim Hlth Def, Sao Luis, MA, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Maranhao, Lab Parasite Control, Sao Luis, Maranhao, Brazil
[3] Fed Inst Educ Sci & Technol Maranhao, Sao Luis, Maranhao, Brazil
[4] Univ Fed Maranhao, Ctr Biol & Hlth Sci, Postgrad Program Hlth Sci, Sao Luis, MA, Brazil
[5] Univ Fed Goias, Sch Vet & Zootechny, Goiania, Go, Brazil
[6] Univ Sao Paulo, Fac Vet Med & Anim Sci, Dept Prevent Vet Med & Anim Hlth, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[7] Univ Fed Maranhao, Ctr Biol & Hlth Sci, Postgrad Program Northeast Biotechnol Network RENO, Sao Luis, MA, Brazil
关键词
Rhipicephalus (Boophilus)microplus; Amazon; Temperature; Precipitation; Biology; Brazil; IXODIDAE; ACARI;
D O I
10.1186/s13071-024-06220-w
中图分类号
R38 [医学寄生虫学]; Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ; 100103 ;
摘要
Background Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus is the most important tick species affecting cattle in the world. Under field conditions, the non-parasitic phase of R. (B.) microplus is unknown in the Amazon biome, including Brazil. The present study aimed to evaluate the non-parasitic phase of R. (B.) microplus in field (grass plots) and laboratory conditions. Methods The study was conducted from September 2020 to April 2022 in an Amazonian region (Maranhao State, Brazil). We evaluated the biological parameters of R. (B.) microplus under laboratory and field conditions. Engorged females were exposed to experimental conditions every 14 days, totaling 20 months of study. The following biological parameters were observed: pre-oviposition period, egg mass incubation period, and maximum larval survival period. Results Abiotic data (e.g., temperature and humidity) varied little throughout the year. Precipitation was the factor that varied the most throughout the year (dry similar to 30 mm(3) and rain 400 mm(3)), and the parameters of pre-oviposition and pre-hatching are longer during the rainy season. A possible negative effect of the dry season on the percentage of hatched eggs was observed. Larval longevity in the plots of both control and free females was short (mean similar to 50-60 days), below that recorded for larvae under controlled conditions (mean similar to 95 days). Conclusions Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus was able to complete its non-parasitic phase by producing host-seeking larvae in the pasture during all months of the study. The results indicate that R. (B.) microplus can complete up to six generations per year in biome Amazon. To our knowledge, this is the highest number of annual generations for R. (B.) microplus in Latin America.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Koppen's climate classification map for Brazil
    Alvares, Clayton Alcarde
    Stape, Jose Luiz
    Sentelhas, Paulo Cesar
    de Moraes Goncalves, Jose Leonardo
    Sparovek, Gerd
    [J]. METEOROLOGISCHE ZEITSCHRIFT, 2013, 22 (06) : 711 - 728
  • [2] Review of Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) applications in Brazil: Challenges and prospects
    Bressiani, Danielle de Almeida
    Gassman, Philip W.
    Fernandes, Josimar Gurgel
    Pospissil Garbossa, Luis Hamilton
    Srinivasan, Raghavan
    Bonuma, Nadia Bernardi
    Mendiondo, Eduardo Mario
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2015, 8 (03) : 9 - 35
  • [3] Population dynamics of the cattle tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus in a subtropical subhumid region of Argentina for use in the design of control strategies
    Canevari, J. T.
    Mangold, A. J.
    Guglielmone, A. A.
    Nava, S.
    [J]. MEDICAL AND VETERINARY ENTOMOLOGY, 2017, 31 (01) : 6 - 14
  • [4] Biological parameters forRhipicephalus microplusin the field and laboratory and estimation of its annual number of generations in a tropical region
    Cruz, Breno Cayeiro
    de Lima Mendes, Ana Flavia
    Maciel, Willian Giquelin
    dos Santos, Isabella Barbosa
    Gomes, Lucas Vinicius Costa
    Felippelli, Gustavo
    Teixeira, Weslen Fabricio Pires
    Ferreira, Lorena Lopes
    Soares, Vando Edesio
    Lopes, Welber Daniel Zanetti
    da Costa, Alvimar Jose
    de Oliveira, Gilson Pereira
    [J]. PARASITOLOGY RESEARCH, 2020, 119 (08) : 2421 - 2430
  • [5] de Barros Michelline Nicolle D L, 2017, Vet Parasitol Reg Stud Reports, V9, P17, DOI 10.1016/j.vprsr.2017.04.004
  • [6] One Health Approach to Identify Research Needs on Rhipicephalus microplus Ticks in the Americas
    Estrada-Pena, Agustin
    Rodriguez Mallon, Alina
    Bermudez, Sergio
    de la Fuente, Jose
    Domingos, Ana
    Estrada Garcia, Mario Pablo
    Labruna, Marcelo B.
    Merino, Octavio
    Mosqueda, Juan
    Nava, Santiago
    Lleonart Cruz, Ricardo
    Szabo, Matias
    Tarragona, Evelina
    Venzal, Jose M.
    [J]. PATHOGENS, 2022, 11 (10):
  • [7] Reinstatement of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) australis (Acari: Ixodidae) With Redescription of the Adult and Larval Stages
    Estrada-Pena, Agustin
    Venzal, Jose M.
    Nava, Santiago
    Mangold, Atilio
    Guglielmone, Alberto A.
    Labruna, Marcelo B.
    de la Fuente, Jose
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ENTOMOLOGY, 2012, 49 (04) : 794 - 802
  • [8] Evans DE, 1978, Boophilus microplus Ecological Studies and a Tick Faune Synopsis Related to the Developing Cattle Industry in the Latin American and Caribbean Region, P283
  • [9] Gonzales JC., 1985, Arq Fac Vet UFRGS, V3, P21
  • [10] Reassessment of the potential economic impact of cattle parasites in Brazil
    Grisi, Laerte
    Leite, Romario Cerqueira
    de Souza Martins, Joao Ricardo
    Medeiros de Barros, Antonio Thadeu
    Andreotti, Renato
    Duarte Cancado, Paulo Henrique
    Perez de Leon, Adalberto Angel
    Pereira, Jairo Barros
    Villela, Humberto Silva
    [J]. REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE PARASITOLOGIA VETERINARIA, 2014, 23 (02): : 150 - 156