Cost-benefit analysis of emission reduction techniques: a case for container vessel

被引:6
作者
Ejder, Emir [1 ]
Karatug, Caglar [1 ]
Arslanoglu, Yasin [1 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Tech Univ, Maritime Fac, TR-34940 Istanbul, Turkiye
关键词
Ammonia; LNG; emission reduction; scrubber; SCR; cost-benefit analysis; ECA REGULATIONS; TECHNOLOGIES; FUEL; SOX; DIESEL; PERFORMANCE; SELECTION; NOX;
D O I
10.1080/20464177.2024.2317511
中图分类号
U6 [水路运输]; P75 [海洋工程];
学科分类号
0814 ; 081505 ; 0824 ; 082401 ;
摘要
One of the most important issues in the maritime industry is controlling and reducing the amount of emissions caused by marine vessels. In this respect, the International Maritime Organization sets some air pollution-related regulations and encourages maritime companies to utilise current and innovative emission abatement methods on their ships. The application of these approaches to ships not only provides environmental benefits but also creates additional financial costs for the company. In this study, operational data of a container ship has been acquired and examined. Methods such as ammonia, LNG, scrubber, low sulphur fuel use, and selective catalytic reduction have been considered to determine the most appropriate emission reduction approach. Nine different scenarios have been created with the use of stated methods and each scenario is analysed both environmentally and economically and compared to each other. Finally, the most suitable scenario has been determined by calculating the payback period of each investment. Since there is a relatively longer period of redemption, using a dual-fuel engine could be more suitable for long-lasting and newly built ships. For the currently cruising ships, the use of scrubber systems with selective catalytic reduction is an effective solution to reduce the number of emissions.
引用
收藏
页码:259 / 269
页数:11
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]   Adapting the shipping sector to stricter emissions regulations: Fuel switching or installing a scrubber? [J].
Abadie, Luis Maria ;
Goicoechea, Nestor ;
Galarraga, Ibon .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 57 :237-250
[2]   Techno-economic and environmental assessment of stationary electricity storage technologies for different time scales [J].
Abdon, Andreas ;
Zhang, Xiaojin ;
Parra, David ;
Patel, Martin K. ;
Bauer, Christian ;
Worlitschek, Jorg .
ENERGY, 2017, 139 :1173-1187
[3]  
ABS, 2020, NH3 FUEL C
[4]   An environmental and economic analysis of methanol fuel for a cellular container ship [J].
Ammar, Nader R. .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 69 :66-76
[5]   Eco-environmental analysis of ship emission control methods: Case study RO-RO cargo vessel [J].
Ammar, Nader R. ;
Seddiek, Ibrahim S. .
OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2017, 137 :166-173
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2024, S&P Global Commodity Insights Includes Data Current as of June 2024: 15
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Review of maritime transport 2017, P1, DOI DOI 10.18356/E9-3B605-EN
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2020, Ammonia: Zero-Carbon Fertiliser, Fuel and Energy Store
[9]   Compliance possibilities for the future ECA regulations through the use of abatement technologies or change of fuels [J].
Brynolf, S. ;
Magnusson, M. ;
Fridell, E. ;
Andersson, K. .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 28 :6-18
[10]   An Experimental Investigation on Seawater SO2 Scrubbing for Marine Application [J].
Caiazzo, Giuseppe ;
Langella, Giuseppe ;
Miccio, Francesco ;
Scala, Fabrizio .
ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRESS & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2013, 32 (04) :1179-1186