NO HEIGHTENED MUSICAL PITCH WEIGHTING FOR TONE LANGUAGE SPEAKERS IN EARLY CHILDHOOD

被引:0
作者
Creel, Sarah C. [1 ]
Mizrahi, Reina [1 ]
Escobedo, Alicia G. [1 ]
Zhao, Li [2 ]
Heyman, Gail D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Social Sci Res Bldg,Room 236,7835 Trade St, San Diego, CA 92121 USA
[2] Hangzhou Normal Univ, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
来源
MUSIC PERCEPTION | 2023年 / 40卷 / 03期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
pitch; language and music; child development; auditory perception; perception; PERCEPTION; EXPERIENCE; CONTOUR; SPEECH;
D O I
10.1525/MP.2023.40.3.193
中图分类号
J6 [音乐];
学科分类号
摘要
NUMEROUS STUDIES SUGGEST THAT SPEAKERS OF some tone languages show advantages in musical pitch processing compared to non-tone language speakers. A recent study in adults (Jasmin et al., 2021) suggests that in addition to heightened pitch sensitivity, tone language speakers weight pitch information more strongly than other auditory cues (amplitude, duration) in both linguistic and nonlinguistic settings compared to nontone language speakers. The current study asks whether pitch upweighting is evident in early childhood. To test this, two groups of 3- to 5-year-old children-tonelanguage speakers (n = 48), a group previously shown to have a perceptual advantage in musical pitch tasks (Creel et al., 2018), and non-tone-language speakers (n = 48)-took part in a musical ``word learning'' task. Children associated two cartoon characters with two brief musical phrases differing in both musical instrument and contour. If tone language speakers weight pitch more strongly, cue conflict trials should show stronger pitch responding than for non-tone speakers. In contrast to both adult speakers' stronger pitch weighting and child and adult pitch perception advantages, tone-language-speaking children did not show greater weighting of pitch information than non-tonelanguage speaking children. This suggests a slow developmental course for pitch reweighting, contrasting with apparent early emergence of pitch sensitivity.
引用
收藏
页码:193 / 201
页数:9
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4
    Bates, Douglas
    Maechler, Martin
    Bolker, Benjamin M.
    Walker, Steven C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE, 2015, 67 (01): : 1 - 48
  • [2] The influence of linguistic experience on the cognitive processing of pitch in speech and nonspeech sounds
    Bent, T
    Bradlow, AR
    Wright, BA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2006, 32 (01) : 97 - 103
  • [3] Tone Language Speakers and Musicians Share Enhanced Perceptual and Cognitive Abilities for Musical Pitch: Evidence for Bidirectionality between the Domains of Language and Music
    Bidelman, Gavin M.
    Hutka, Stefanie
    Moreno, Sylvain
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (04):
  • [4] Bradley EvanD., 2016, Psychomusicology: Music, Mind, and Brain, V26, P337, DOI [10.1037/pmu0000162, DOI 10.1037/PMU0000162]
  • [5] Ups and Downs in Auditory Development: Preschoolers' Sensitivity to Pitch Contour and Timbre
    Creel, Sarah C.
    [J]. COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2016, 40 (02) : 373 - 403
  • [6] Tipping the Scales: Auditory Cue Weighting Changes Over Development
    Creel, Sarah C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2014, 40 (03) : 1146 - 1160
  • [7] Creel SC., 2018, Developmental science, V21
  • [8] A tonal-language benefit for pitch in normally-hearing and cochlear-implanted children
    Deroche, Mickael L. D.
    Lu, Hui-Ping
    Kulkarni, Aditya M.
    Caldwell, Meredith
    Barrett, Karen C.
    Peng, Shu-Chen
    Limb, Charles J.
    Lin, Yung-Song
    Chatterjee, Monita
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2019, 9 (1)
  • [9] Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results
    Dienes, Zoltan
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 5
  • [10] Fancourt A., 2013, Psychomusicology: Music, Mind, and Brain, V23, P73, DOI DOI 10.1037/A0033301