Cross-Cultural Measurement of Cyberbullying Perpetration and Victimization in India and the US

被引:0
作者
Doty, Jennifer L. L. [1 ]
Mehari, Krista R. R. [2 ]
Sharma, Drishti
Ma, Xiaoqi [1 ]
Sharma, Nandini [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oregon, Dept Counseling Psychol & Human Serv, Eugene, OR 97403 USA
[2] Univ S Alabama, Dept Psychol, Mobile, AL 36688 USA
[3] Maulana Azad Med Coll, New Delhi, India
关键词
Cyberbullying; India; Validity; Psychometrics; CYBER AGGRESSION; YOUNG-ADULTS; FIT INDEXES; GENDER; ADOLESCENTS; PREVALENCE; VICTIM;
D O I
10.1007/s10862-023-10039-7
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Few studies in India have conducted research on cyberbullying, and the existing studies lack information about psychometric properties of cyberbullying measures. To address this gap in the literature, the current study evaluated the psychometric properties of a behavioral assessment of cyberbullying perpetration and victimization from the Problem Behavior Frequency Scales-Adolescent Revised among Indian youth. Parallel samples were recruited from the New Delhi area (N = 178; Mage = 12.47; 57.1% male) and the U.S. (N = 307; Mage = 11.79; 51.9% male). A confirmatory factor analysis indicated that a one-factor solution for both scales had good fit with the data, similar to the original validation of the scale. We found measurement equivalence for cyberbullying perpetration across demographic subgroups in India-gender, age, religion, free- or reduced-price lunch, geographic location, and type of school. Measurement equivalence was found for cyberbullying victimization across subgroups in India, except for free- or reduced-price lunch status. Invariance testing across countries resulted in strong invariance for cyberbullying perpetration (e.g., same structure, factor loadings, and intercepts). Invariance testing across countries for cyberbullying victimization was weak (e.g., same structure and factor loadings), suggesting caution against cross-cultural comparisons when using the cyberbullying victimization measure. The results build capacity for cyberbullying research in India so that risk and protective factors can be measured with validated cyberbullying scales to identify ways to reduce cyberbullying.
引用
收藏
页码:1068 / 1080
页数:13
相关论文
共 58 条
  • [41] Examining ethnic, gender, and developmental differences in the way children report being a victim of "bullying" on self-report measures
    Sawyer, Anne L.
    Bradshaw, Catherine P.
    O'Brennan, Lindsey M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT HEALTH, 2008, 43 (02) : 106 - 114
  • [42] Cyberbullying Prevalence Among US Middle and High School-Aged Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Quality Assessment
    Selkie, Ellen M.
    Fales, Jessica L.
    Moreno, Megan A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT HEALTH, 2016, 58 (02) : 125 - 133
  • [43] Sharma D., 2022, CYBERBULLYING DIGITA
  • [44] Aggression in schools: Cyberbullying and gender issues
    Sharma, Drishti
    Kishore, Jugal
    Sharma, Nandini
    Duggal, Mona
    [J]. ASIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2017, 29 : 142 - 145
  • [45] Prevalence estimation of school bullying with the Olweus Bully Victim Questionnaire
    Solberg, ME
    Olweus, D
    [J]. AGGRESSIVE BEHAVIOR, 2003, 29 (03) : 239 - 268
  • [46] Sondhi R., 2017, Child and adolescent Mental Health, P91, DOI DOI 10.5772/66451
  • [47] Traditional and Cyber Aggressors and Victims: A Comparison of Psychosocial Characteristics
    Sontag, Lisa M.
    Clemans, Katherine H.
    Graber, Julia A.
    Lyndon, Sarah T.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF YOUTH AND ADOLESCENCE, 2011, 40 (04) : 392 - 404
  • [48] Following you home from school: A critical review and synthesis of research on cyberbullying victimization
    Tokunaga, Robert S.
    [J]. COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2010, 26 (03) : 277 - 287
  • [49] UNICEF, 2020, EMP BOYS GIRLS IND
  • [50] A systematic review and content analysis of bullying and cyber-bullying measurement strategies
    Vivolo-Kantor, Alana M.
    Martell, Brandi N.
    Holland, Kristin M.
    Westby, Ruth
    [J]. AGGRESSION AND VIOLENT BEHAVIOR, 2014, 19 (04) : 423 - 434