Does green credit really increase green technology innovation?

被引:78
作者
Lin, Tao [1 ]
Wu, Wanwan [1 ]
Du, Mingyue [2 ]
Ren, Siyu [3 ,4 ]
Huang, Yangping [1 ]
Cifuentes-Faura, Javier [5 ]
机构
[1] Jimei Univ, Sch Finance & Econ, Xiamen, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Technol & Business Univ, Sch Econ, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Nankai Univ, Sch Econ, Weijin Rd 94, Tianjin 300071, Peoples R China
[4] Nankai Univ, Ctr Transnatl Studies, Tianjin, Peoples R China
[5] Univ Murcia, Fac Econ & Business, Murcia, Spain
关键词
green credit; green technology innovation; China; sustainable development; heavy polluters; ECO-INNOVATION; EMPIRICAL-ANALYSIS; PERFORMANCE; DETERMINANTS; INVESTMENT; COMPANIES; DRIVERS; IMPACT; POLICY;
D O I
10.1177/00368504231191985
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Considering China's green credit policy (GCP) as a quasi-natural experiment, this study discusses the effect of GCP on enterprise green innovation (GI) using a difference-in-difference method based on data from Chinese listed companies from 2009 to 2020. The results indicate that green credit enhances the strategic GI of heavy polluters while significantly inhibiting essential GI, thus suggesting the nonexistence of the Porter effect. In addition, the inhibition effect is attributed to an increase in financing constraints and a reduction in government subsidies, firm research and development investment, and employment scale. This disincentive effect is particularly pronounced in privately owned firms, small cities, and capital-intensive low-profitability firms. Resource misallocation caused by the GCP fails to stimulate the green transformation of heavily polluting industries through the Porter effect. Hence, governments should establish a diversified green financial system, integrate green venture capital and GI elements, and guide the flow of social capital toward green industries.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   Trade-off between environmental sustainability and economic growth through coal consumption and natural resources exploitation in China: New policy insights from wavelet local multiple correlation [J].
Adebayo, Tomiwa Sunday .
GEOLOGICAL JOURNAL, 2023, 58 (04) :1384-1400
[2]   Green Innovation and Financial Performance: An Institutional Approach [J].
Aguilera-Caracuel, Javier ;
Ortiz-de-Mandojana, Natalia .
ORGANIZATION & ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 26 (04) :365-385
[3]   Green Credit, Green Stimulus, Green Revolution? China's Mobilization of Banks for Environmental Cleanup [J].
Aizawa, Motoko ;
Yang, Chaofei .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENT & DEVELOPMENT, 2010, 19 (02) :119-144
[4]   The impacts of government R&D subsidies on green innovation: Evidence from Chinese energy-intensive firms [J].
Bai, Yu ;
Song, Siyi ;
Jiao, Jianling ;
Yang, Ranran .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 233 (819-829) :819-829
[5]   Knowledge sources and impacts on subsequent inventions: Do green technologies differ from non-green ones? [J].
Barbieri, Nicole ;
Marzucchi, Alberto ;
Rizzo, Ugo .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2020, 49 (02)
[6]   The drivers of eco-innovation and its impact on performance: Evidence from China [J].
Cai, Wugan ;
Li, Guangpei .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 176 :110-118
[7]   The real value of China's stock market [J].
Carpenter, Jennifer N. ;
Lu, Fangzhou ;
Whitelaw, Robert F. .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2021, 139 (03) :679-696
[8]   Do voluntary pollution reduction programs (VPRs) spur or deter environmental innovation? Evidence from 33/50 [J].
Carrion-Flores, Carmen E. ;
Innes, Robert ;
Sam, Abdoul G. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2013, 66 (03) :444-459
[9]   Can green credit policy promote low-carbon technology innovation? [J].
Chen, Zhigang ;
Zhang, Yuqi ;
Wang, Haisen ;
Ouyang, Xiao ;
Xie, Yuxi .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 359
[10]   Mainstreaming Green Product Innovation: Why and How Companies Integrate Environmental Sustainability [J].
Dangelico, Rosa Maria ;
Pujari, Devashish .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2010, 95 (03) :471-486