Contested Facts: The Politics and Practice of International Fact-Finding Missions

被引:6
作者
Lesch, Max [1 ]
机构
[1] Peace Res Inst Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
关键词
international organizations; fact-finding; Chile; organizaciones internacionales; investigacion; organisations internationales; enquete; Chili; HUMAN-RIGHTS; UNITED-NATIONS; COMMISSIONS; PERFORMANCE; ENFORCEMENT; INFORMATION; INQUIRY;
D O I
10.1093/isr/viad034
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
International organizations (IOs) dispatch fact-finding missions to establish epistemic authority by objectively and impartially assessing contested facts. Despite this technocratic promise, they are often controversial and sometimes even fuel international disputes that challenge the epistemic authority of the dispatching organizations. Although the twenty-first century has witnessed a proliferation of United Nations (UN) commissions of inquiry, they have received surprisingly little attention in international relations (IR) scholarship. How can we explain this trend and the successes and failures of fact-finding missions, which sometimes even backfire on the IO authority? Drawing on IR theories of delegation, epistemic authority, and IO field operations as well as public international law scholarship on commissions of inquiry, this article develops an analytical framework for studying the delegation, implementation, and dissemination of fact-finding missions. It theorizes how and under what conditions international fact-finding missions close or widen credibility gaps and thus help to establish, maintain, or weaken the epistemic authority of IOs. The article illustrates this framework with a case study of the Ad Hoc Working Group on the Human Rights Situation in Chile, sent by the UN Commission on Human Rights in 1974 to investigate allegations of human rights violations and torture. The conclusion outlines a comparative research agenda on international fact-finding missions for IR that contributes to the study of knowledge production in IOs and the enforcement of international norms.
引用
收藏
页数:27
相关论文
共 127 条
[1]  
Abbott K. W., 2020, The Governors Dilemma: Indirect Governance Beyond Principals and Agents
[2]   The concept of legalization [J].
Abbott, KW ;
Keohane, RO ;
Moravcsik, A ;
Slaughter, AM ;
Snidal, D .
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION, 2000, 54 (03) :401-+
[3]  
ABBOTT KW, 1993, CORNELL INT LAW J, V26, P1
[4]  
Allen Lori., 2020, A History of False Hope: Investigative Commissions in Palestine
[5]  
Alston P., 2016, TRANSFORMATION HUMAN, P3
[6]  
Alston Phillip., 2013, Proceedings of the Annual Meeting, V107, P61
[7]   Theorizing the Judicialization of International Relations [J].
Alter, Karen J. ;
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M. ;
Helfer, Laurence R. .
INTERNATIONAL STUDIES QUARTERLY, 2019, 63 (03) :449-463
[8]  
Alter KarenJ., 2016, Law and Contemporary Problems, V79, P1
[9]   Problematising war: Towards a reconstructive critique of war as a problem of deviance [J].
Andrae, Christine .
REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES, 2022, 48 (04) :705-724
[10]  
Autesserre Severine., 2014, Peaceland: Conflict Resolution and the Everyday Politics of International Intervention, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781107280366