Revisiting postponement: The importance of cross-functional integration to understand tax implications in global supply chains

被引:6
作者
Norrman, Andreas [1 ]
Prataviera, Lorenzo Bruno [2 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Fac Engn, Div Engn Logist, Lund, Sweden
[2] Cranfield Univ, Ctr Logist Procurement & Supply Chain Management, Cranfield Sch Management, Bedford, England
关键词
boundary object; cross-functional integration; global supply chains; operating model; postponement boundary problem; software supply; tax implications; INTERNATIONAL TRANSFER; BOUNDARY OBJECTS; LOGISTICS; DESIGN; MODEL; STRATEGIES; MANAGEMENT; OPERATIONS; FRAMEWORK; NETWORKS;
D O I
10.1111/jbl.12351
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
As products and supply chains (SCs) evolve, logisticians must revisit their understanding of postponement. The postponement boundary problem acknowledges that value-adding operations' timing and location in global SCs are critical decisions, impacted by taxes and government regulations in different jurisdictions. However, when combining hardware and software objects, software's increasing importance heightens the implications of when and where value is added. Until now, postponement scholars mostly have overlooked fiscal/legal implications, and current research tied to the postponement boundary decision-making phenomenon has not considered hardware and software combination. Moreover, we lack understanding about how to make cross-functional decisions when interrelatedness between the logistics and fiscal/legal domains increases. We used an abductive approach to elaborate and contextualize postponement decision making for global SCs of product offerings that combine hardware and software objects. A single-case study (with four subcases) was used to explore postponement decisions (and related fiscal and legal implications) and cross-functional integration (CFI) at a global high-tech enterprise. We also elaborated on the contextual drivers of increased postponement boundary complexity to illustrate changes in its decision making. We also emphasized formalized boundary objects' importance in enhancing CFI by developing formal steering documents, creating interdependent organizational structures, and aligning trade-offs and outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:693 / 718
页数:26
相关论文
共 94 条
[61]  
Patton M.Q., 2014, Qualitative research evaluation methods
[62]   Cross-Functional Integration: Concept Clarification and Scale Development [J].
Pellathy, Daniel A. ;
Mollenkopf, Diane A. ;
Stank, Theodore P. ;
Autry, Chad W. .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS LOGISTICS, 2019, 40 (02) :81-104
[63]  
Petriccione M., 2007, FUNDAMENTALS INT TAX, P183
[64]   Coping with the postponement boundary problem: an empirical investigation in global food supply chains [J].
Prataviera, Lorenzo Bruno ;
Moretti, Emilio ;
Tappia, Elena .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT, 2022, 33 (02) :687-711
[65]   Global distribution network design: exploration of facility location driven by tax considerations and related cross-country implications [J].
Prataviera, Lorenzo Bruno ;
Norrman, Andreas ;
Melacini, Marco .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LOGISTICS-RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, 2022, 25 (07) :1067-1090
[66]   Postponement Strategies for Global Downstream Supply Chains: A Conceptual Framework [J].
Prataviera, Lorenzo Bruno ;
Perotti, Sara ;
Melacini, Marco ;
Moretti, Emilio .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS LOGISTICS, 2020, 41 (02) :94-110
[67]   A STRUCTURE-CONDUCT-PERFORMANCE PERSPECTIVE OF HOW STRATEGIC SUPPLY CHAIN INTEGRATION AFFECTS FIRM PERFORMANCE [J].
Ralston, Peter M. ;
Blackhurst, Jennifer ;
Cantor, David E. ;
Crum, Michael R. .
JOURNAL OF SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT, 2015, 51 (02) :47-64
[68]   A framework for designing a supply chain distribution network [J].
Ribas, I. ;
Lusa, A. ;
Corominas, A. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2019, 57 (07) :2104-2116
[69]   EXPLORING A GOVERNANCE THEORY OF SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT: BARRIERS AND FACILITATORS TO INTEGRATION [J].
Richey, R. Glenn, Jr. ;
Roath, Anthony S. ;
Whipple, Judith M. ;
Fawcett, Stanley E. .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS LOGISTICS, 2010, 31 (01) :237-+
[70]  
Sawhney R., 2005, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, V35, P278, DOI 10.1108/09600030510599931