Pebbling in powers of paths

被引:2
作者
Alcon, Liliana [1 ]
Hurlbert, Glenn [2 ]
机构
[1] UNLP, CeMaLP, CONICET, La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina
[2] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Dept Math & Appl Math, Richmond, VA 23284 USA
关键词
Graph pebbling; Pebbling number; Pebbling exponent; Target conjecture;
D O I
10.1016/j.disc.2023.113315
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
The t -fold pebbling number, pi t(G), of a graph G is defined to be the minimum number m so that, from any given configuration of m pebbles on the vertices of G, it is possible to place at least t pebbles on any specified vertex via pebbling moves. It has been conjectured that the pebbling numbers of pyramid-free chordal graphs can be calculated in polynomial time.The kth power G(k) of the graph G is obtained from G by adding an edge between any two vertices of distance at most k from each other. The kth power of the path Pn on n vertices is an important class of pyramid-free chordal graphs, and is a stepping stone to the more general class of k-paths and the still more general class of interval graphs. Pachter, Snevily, and Voxman (1995) calculated pi(Pn(2)), Kim (2004) calculated pi (P(3) n ), and Kim and Kim (2010) calculated pi(Pn(4)). In this paper we calculate pi t(Pn(k)) for all n, k, and t.For a function D : V (G)-> N, the D -pebbling number, pi (G, D), of a graph G is defined to be the minimum number m so that, from any given configuration of m pebbles on the vertices of G, it is possible to place at least D(v) pebbles on each vertex v via pebbling moves. It has been conjectured that pi (G, D) <= pi|D|(G) for all G and D. We make the stronger conjecture that every G and D satisfies pi (G, D) <= pi|D|(G) - (s(D) - 1), where s(D) counts the number of vertices v with D(v) > 0. We prove that trees and Pn(k), for all n and k, satisfy the stronger conjecture.The pebbling exponent e pi (G) of a graph G was defined by Pachter et al., to be the minimum k for which pi(G(k)) = n(G(k)). Of course, e pi (G) <= diam(G), and Czygrinow, Hurlbert, Kierstead, and Trotter (2002) proved that almost all graphs G have e pi (G) =1. Lourdusamy and Mathivanan (2015) proved several results on pi t(Cn2), and Hurlbert (2017) proved an asymptotically tight formula for e pi(Cn). Our formula for pi t(Pn(k)) allows us to compute e pi (Pn) within additively narrow bounds.(c) 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Alcon L., 2015, Elec. Notes Discret. Math., V150, P145
  • [2] Alcon L., 2019, J MED VIROL, V46, P38
  • [3] Pebbling in semi-2-trees
    Alcon, Liliana
    Gutierrez, Marisa
    Hurlbert, Glenn
    [J]. DISCRETE MATHEMATICS, 2017, 340 (07) : 1467 - 1480
  • [4] PEBBLING IN SPLIT GRAPHS
    Alcon, Liliana
    Gutierrez, Marisa
    Hurlbert, Glenn
    [J]. SIAM JOURNAL ON DISCRETE MATHEMATICS, 2014, 28 (03) : 1449 - 1466
  • [5] Pebbling and optimal pebbling in graphs
    Bunde, David P.
    Chambers, Erin W.
    Cranston, Daniel
    Milans, Kevin
    West, Douglas B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GRAPH THEORY, 2008, 57 (03) : 215 - 238
  • [6] Chung F., 1989, J. Discrete Math., V2, P467, DOI [10.1137/0402041, DOI 10.1137/0402041]
  • [7] The cover pebbling number of graphs
    Crull, B
    Cundiff, T
    Feltman, P
    Hurlbert, GH
    Pudwell, L
    Szaniszlo, Z
    Tuza, Z
    [J]. DISCRETE MATHEMATICS, 2005, 296 (01) : 15 - 23
  • [8] A note on graph pebbling
    Czygrinow, A
    Hurlbert, G
    Kierstead, HAI
    Trotter, WT
    [J]. GRAPHS AND COMBINATORICS, 2002, 18 (02) : 219 - 225
  • [9] Gross J.L., 2014, Handbook of graph theory, V2nd
  • [10] t-Pebbling and Extensions
    Herscovici, D. S.
    Hester, B. D.
    Hurlbert, G. H.
    [J]. GRAPHS AND COMBINATORICS, 2013, 29 (04) : 955 - 975