Gully erosion susceptibility mapping and prioritization of gully-dominant sub-watersheds using machine learning algorithms: Evidence from the Silabati River (tropical river, India)

被引:3
|
作者
Hasanuzzaman, Md [1 ,2 ]
Adhikary, Partha Pratim [3 ]
Shit, Pravat Kumar [1 ]
机构
[1] Raja NL Khan Womens Coll Autonomous, PG Dept Geog, Gope Palace, Midnapore 721102, West Bengal, India
[2] Vidyasagar Univ, Raja NL Khan Womens Coll Autonomous, Res Ctr Nat & Appl Sci, Midnapore 721102, West Bengal, India
[3] ICAR Indian Inst Water Management, Bhubaneswar 751023, Odisha, India
关键词
Gully erosion; Random Forest (RF); Extreme Gradient Boost (XGBoost); Silabati River; Sub-watershed; India; RANDOM FOREST; SPATIAL PREDICTION; REGRESSION; MODELS; HAZARD; BASIN; TREE;
D O I
10.1016/j.asr.2023.10.051
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Gully erosion is a severe environmental issue that poses threats to agriculture, human safety, habitats, infrastructure, and soil integrity. Selecting the right machine learning model is vital for accurate Gully Erosion Susceptibility Mapping (GESM) due to varying environmental hazard performance. This study employed a comparative analysis of two machine learning techniques, Random Forest (RF) and Extreme Gradient Boost (XGBoost), to develop a highly precise GESM for the Silabati watershed (India). The analysis incorporated 24 controlling factors and examined a dataset of 460 sample points, with equal representation of gullies and non-gullies. Variance Inflation Factors (VIF) and Information Gain Ratio (IGR) techniques were applied to assess multicollinearity test among the controlling factors. Lithology, elevation, distance from the road, LULC, geomorphology, rainfall, drainage density, and coarse fragments emerged as crucial factors in determining GESM. Statistical tests, including the Kappa index, Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Accuracy (ACC), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Coefficient of Determination (R2), and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC), were employed to evaluate the RF and XGB models on training and testing data. Both models demonstrated strong performance, with the XGBoost and RF models achieving ROC values of 84.1% and 83.2%, respectively. The applied quantile classification method resulted in the creation of five distinct GESMs, categorized as very high (VH), high (H), moderate (M), low (L), and very low (VL). We found that the very high GESM areas of the watershed were 4.10% in the XGBoost model and 4.61%. in the RF model. Out of the 26 sub-watersheds, the results have identified five sub-watersheds as highly prioritized for sustainable management. Therefore, the present study provides an accurate gully erosion identification using advanced models, offering valuable insights for policymakers to proper management implementation. (c) 2023 COSPAR. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1653 / 1666
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A comparison of performance measures of three machine learning algorithms for flood susceptibility mapping of river Silabati (tropical river, India)
    Hasanuzzaman, Md
    Islam, Aznarul
    Bera, Biswajit
    Shit, Pravat Kumar
    PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY OF THE EARTH, 2022, 127
  • [2] Prediction of gully erosion susceptibility mapping using novel ensemble machine learning algorithms
    Arabameri, Alireza
    Pal, Subodh Chandra
    Costache, Romulus
    Saha, Asish
    Rezaie, Fatemeh
    Danesh, Amir Seyed
    Pradhan, Biswajeet
    Lee, Saro
    Nhat-Duc Hoang
    GEOMATICS NATURAL HAZARDS & RISK, 2021, 12 (01) : 469 - 498
  • [4] Linkages between gully erosion susceptibility and hydrological connectivity in Tropical sub-humid river basin: Application of Machine learning algorithms and Connectivity Index
    Bhattacharya, Raj Kumar
    Das Chatterjee, Nilanjana
    Das, Kousik
    CATENA, 2024, 243
  • [5] Utilizing Machine Learning Algorithms for the Development of Gully Erosion Susceptibility Maps: Evidence from the Chotanagpur Plateau Region, India
    Hasanuzzaman, Md
    Shit, Pravat Kumar
    Alqadhi, Saeed
    Almohamad, Hussein
    ben Hasher, Fahdah Falah
    Abdo, Hazem Ghassan
    Mallick, Javed
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (15)
  • [6] Erosion susceptibility mapping of sub-watersheds for management prioritization using MCDM-based ensemble approach
    Ghosh B.
    Mukhopadhyay S.
    Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2021, 14 (1)
  • [7] Machine Learning-Based Gully Erosion Susceptibility Mapping: A Case Study of Eastern India
    Saha, Sunil
    Roy, Jagabandhu
    Arabameri, Alireza
    Blaschke, Thomas
    Dieu Tien Bui
    SENSORS, 2020, 20 (05)
  • [8] Gully Erosion Susceptibility Mapping in Highly Complex Terrain Using Machine Learning Models
    Yang, Annan
    Wang, Chunmei
    Pang, Guowei
    Long, Yongqing
    Wang, Lei
    Cruse, Richard M.
    Yang, Qinke
    ISPRS INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEO-INFORMATION, 2021, 10 (10)
  • [9] Gully erosion susceptibility maps and influence factor analysis in the Lhasa River Basin on the Tibetan Plateau, based on machine learning algorithms
    Li, Jianjun
    Chen, Yulan
    Jiao, Juying
    Chen, Yixian
    Chen, Tongde
    Zhao, Chunjing
    Zhao, Wenting
    Shang, Tianshe
    Xu, Qian
    Wang, Haolin
    Bai, Leichao
    CATENA, 2024, 235
  • [10] Modeling gully erosion susceptibility in Phuentsholing, Bhutan using deep learning and basic machine learning algorithms
    Saha, Sunil
    Sarkar, Raju
    Thapa, Gautam
    Roy, Jagabandhu
    ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, 2021, 80 (08)