Minimal important change and difference for knee osteoarthritis outcome measurement tools after non-surgical interventions: a systematic review

被引:18
|
作者
Silva, M. Denika C. [1 ,2 ]
Perriman, Diana M. [1 ,3 ]
Fearon, Angela M. [1 ,4 ]
Couldrick, Jacqui M. [1 ]
Scarvell, Jennie M. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Canberra, Fac Hlth, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[2] Gen Sir John Kotelawala Def Univ, Fac Allied Hlth Sci, Dept Physiotherapy, Werahera, Sri Lanka
[3] Canberra Hosp, Trauma & Orthopaed Res Unit, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[4] Univ Canberra, Res Inst Sport & Exercise, Canberra, ACT, Australia
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2023年 / 13卷 / 05期
关键词
STATISTICS & RESEARCH METHODS; Knee; Musculoskeletal disorders; CLINICALLY-IMPORTANT-IMPROVEMENT; PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES; TEST-RETEST RELIABILITIES; PRESSURE PAIN THRESHOLD; SYMPTOM-STATE PASS; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; DETECTABLE CHANGE; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; PHYSICAL FUNCTION;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063026
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives To systematically review and provide estimates of the minimal important change (MIC) and difference (MID) for outcome tools in people with knee osteoarthritis (OA) after non-surgical interventions.DesignA systematic review.Data sources MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus and Cochrane databases were searched up to 21 September 2021.Eligibility criteria We included studies that calculated MIC and MID using any calculation method including anchor, consensus and distribution methods, for any knee OA outcome tool after non-surgical interventions.Data extraction and synthesis We extracted reported MIC, MID and minimum detectable change (MDC) estimates. We used quality assessment tools appropriate to the studies' methods to screen out low-quality studies. Values were combined to produce a median and range, for each method.Results Forty-eight studies were eligible (anchor-k=12, consensus-k=1 and distribution-k=35). MIC values for 13 outcome tools including Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)-pain, activities of daily living (ADL), quality of life (QOL) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC)-function were estimated using 5 high-quality anchor studies. MID values for 23 tools including KOOS-pain, ADL, QOL and WOMAC-function, stiffness and total were estimated using 6 high-quality anchor studies. One moderate quality consensus study reported MIC for pain, function and global assessment. MDC values from distribution method estimates for 126 tools including KOOS-QOL and WOMAC-total were estimated using 38 good-to-fair-quality studies.Conclusion Median MIC, MID and MDC estimates were reported for outcome tools in people with knee OA after non-surgical interventions. The results of this review clarify the current understanding of MIC, MID and MDC in the knee OA population. However, some estimates suggest considerable heterogeneity and require careful interpretation.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [21] Does surgical volume affect outcome after primary and revision knee arthroplasty? A systematic review of the literature
    Critchley, R. J.
    Baker, P. N.
    Deehan, D. J.
    KNEE, 2012, 19 (05) : 513 - 518
  • [22] Minimal Clinically Important Difference of Four Commonly Used Balance Assessment Tools in Individuals after Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Cohort Study
    Chan, Andy C. M.
    Pang, Marco Y. C.
    Ouyang, Huixi
    Jehu, Deborah A. M.
    PM&R, 2020, 12 (03) : 238 - 245
  • [23] Minimal important change in the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score and the European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions in adults with hip osteoarthritis after 12 weeks of exercise
    Cheret, Eric P. B. M.
    Mechlenburg, Inger
    Skou, Soren T.
    Dalgas, Ulrik
    Stisen, Martin Gade
    Kjeldsen, Troels
    MUSCULOSKELETAL SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2025, 76
  • [24] What is the evidence of effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical, non-surgical, biopsychosocial interventions for body image and pain management in individuals with endometriosis? A systematic review
    Falconer, Laura
    Hendricks, Emma
    Harcourt, Diana
    JOURNAL OF ENDOMETRIOSIS AND PELVIC PAIN DISORDERS, 2022, 14 (04) : 206 - 216
  • [25] Effectiveness of interventions aiming at reducing sedentary behaviour in a non-surgical population with overweight or obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zabatiero, Juliana
    Ng, Leo
    Clayton, Rebecca
    Middlemiss, Suzanne
    Kang, Kwangil
    Harrold, Megan
    Cavalheri, Vinicius
    OBESITY RESEARCH & CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2019, 13 (02) : 115 - 128
  • [26] Non-surgical interventions for the treatment of masticatory muscular spasticity in patients with cerebral palsy. Systematic review of randomized clinical trials
    Rocha, Monise Mendes
    Cabrera Martimbianco, Ana Luiza
    Beltramin, Rafael Zaratin
    Ratto Tempestini Horliana, Anna Carolina
    Santos, Elaine Marcilio
    Mesquita-Ferrari, Raquel Agnelli
    Santos Fernandes, Kristianne Porta
    Motta, Lara Jansiski
    Turcio, Karina Helga
    Leal Goncalves, Marcela Leticia
    Bussadori, Sandra Kalil
    JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES, 2022, 29 : 68 - 73
  • [27] The Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) for the WOMAC and Factors Related to Achievement of the MCID After Medial Opening Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy for Knee Osteoarthritis
    Kim, Man Soo
    Koh, In Jun
    Choi, Keun Young
    Sung, Yong Gyu
    Park, Dong Chul
    Lee, Hyo Jin
    In, Yong
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2021, 49 (09) : 2406 - 2415
  • [28] Minimal clinically important difference of commonly used hip-, knee-, foot-, and ankle-specific questionnaires: a systematic review
    Celik, Derya
    Coban, Ozge
    Kilicoglu, Onder
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2019, 113 : 44 - 57
  • [29] A systematic review of estimates of the minimal clinically important difference and patient acceptable symptom state of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index in patients who underwent total hip and total knee replacement
    MacKay, C.
    Clements, N.
    Wong, R.
    Davis, A. M.
    OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2019, 27 (10) : 1408 - 1419
  • [30] Measuring the Impact of Surgical and Non-surgical Facial Cosmetic Interventions Using FACE-Q Aesthetic Module Scales: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Gallo, Lucas
    Kim, Patrick
    Churchill, Isabella F.
    Gallo, Matteo
    Yuan, Morgan
    Voineskos, Sophocles H.
    Thoma, Achilles
    Pusic, Andrea L.
    Klassen, Anne F.
    Cano, Stefan J.
    PLASTIC SURGERY, 2024,