Cross-cultural adaptation of The Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire: A methodological systematic review

被引:1
|
作者
Zhou, Ai-fang [1 ,2 ]
Li, Zhuo-yao [1 ]
Cui, Xue-jun [1 ]
Sng, Kim Sia [1 ]
Zhu, Ke [1 ]
Wang, Yong-jun [3 ]
Shu, Bing [3 ]
Zhang, Jian-ping [4 ]
Yao, Min [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Univ Tradit Chinese Med, Longhua Hosp, Spine Dis Inst, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Univ Tradit Chinese Med, Sch Rehabil, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Univ Tradit Chinese Med, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Shanghai Jinshan Dist Hosp Integrated Tradit Chine, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[5] Shanghai Univ Tradit Chinese Med, Longhua Hosp, Spine Dis Inst, 725 South Wanping Rd, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Japanese orthopaedic association back pain; evaluation questionnaire (JOABPEQ); Low back pain (LBP); Systematic review; Cross -cultural adaptation; VALIDITY; RELIABILITY; VERIFICATION; VALIDATION; VERSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jos.2022.08.003
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) is a reliable and sensitive measure of disability to determine functional status and evaluate curative effects in low back pain, it has now been cross-cultural translated into many other languages and adapted for use in different countries. We aim to evaluate the translation procedures and measurement properties of cross-cultural adaptations of the JOABPEQ. Methods: Studies related to cross-cultural adaptation of the JOABPEQ in a specific language/culture were searched in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, SciELO, PsycINFO, SinoMed, and Web of Science from their inception to March 2022. The Guidelines for the Process of Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Self-Report Measures and the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Status Measurement In-struments guideline were used for evaluation. Results: Nine different versions of cross-cultural JOABPEQ adaptations in 8 different languages/cultures were included. The adaptation process was not strictly performed, such as standard forward translation and expert committee review were rarely reported. Content validity (8/9), floor and ceiling effects (3/9), reliability (4/9), and interpretability (6/9) were assessed in most of the adaptations, while agreement (2/ 9), responsiveness (2/9), and the internal consistency (2/9) were not. JOABPEQ can replace functional and quality of life score to reduce the burden of scientific research. Conclusion: We recommend Persian-Iranian, simplified Chinese-Chinese Mandarin, Thai and Gunaydin G's Turkish adaptations for application. The numerical pain rating scale/visual analogue scale in low back pain and lower extremities, as well as numbness in lower extremities could not be neglected in JOABPEQ adaptations.(c) 2022 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of The Japanese Orthopaedic Association.
引用
收藏
页码:984 / 991
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Cross-cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability of the Danish version of the neurophysiology of pain questionnaire
    Nikolaj Agger
    Thor Andre Brøndberg Stæhr
    Michael Skovdal Rathleff
    Lene Baad-Hansen
    Shellie Boudreau
    David Høyrup Christiansen
    Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, 9 (1)
  • [32] Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Brazilian Version of the Wisconsin Brief Pain Questionnaire
    Toledo, Flavia O.
    Barros, Patricia S.
    Herdman, Michael
    Vilagut, Gemma
    Reis, Geraldo C.
    Alonso, Jordi
    da Rosa Sobreira, Claudia Ferreira
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2013, 46 (01) : 121 - 130
  • [33] The validation and cross-cultural adaptation of the PainDETECT questionnaire in osteoarthritis-related pain
    Chang, Xiaofeng
    Yao, Shuxin
    Wei, Jie
    Shang, Lei
    Xu, Chao
    Ma, Jianbing
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2025, 20 (01):
  • [34] Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and psychometric properties of the Hausa version of the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire in patients with low back pain
    Ibrahim, Aminu A.
    Akindele, Mukadas O.
    Kaka, Bashir
    Bello, Bashir
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2019, 19 (01) : 83 - 92
  • [35] Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Urdu version of the back pain functional scale in low back pain patients
    Afzal, Muhammad Waqar
    Ahmad, Ashfaq
    Gilani, Syed Amir
    Zulfaqar, Nimra
    Fatima, Sahar
    Mahmmod, Tahir
    JOURNAL OF BACK AND MUSCULOSKELETAL REHABILITATION, 2024, 37 (03) : 651 - 658
  • [36] A Systematic Review of Cross-cultural Adaptation of the Oswestry Disability Index
    Yao, Min
    Wang, Qiong
    Li, Zun
    Yang, Long
    Huang, Pin-xian
    Sun, Yue-li
    Wang, Jing
    Wang, Yong-jun
    Cui, Xue-jun
    SPINE, 2016, 41 (24) : E1470 - E1478
  • [37] The cross-cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability of the Spanish version of the Fremantle Back Awareness Questionnaire
    Garcia-Dopico, Nuria
    De La Torre-Luque, Alejandro
    Wand, Benedict Martin
    Velasco-Roldan, Olga
    Sitges, Carolina
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [38] Cross-cultural translation, adaptation, and validation of the Amharic version pain self-efficacy questionnaire in people with low back pain in Ethiopia
    Chala, Mulugeta Bayisa
    Donnelly, Catherine
    Wondie, Yemataw
    Ghahari, Setareh
    Miller, Jordan
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2021, 22 (01)
  • [39] Cross-cultural translation, adaptation, and validation of the Amharic version pain self-efficacy questionnaire in people with low back pain in Ethiopia
    Mulugeta Bayisa Chala
    Catherine Donnelly
    Yemataw Wondie
    Setareh Ghahari
    Jordan Miller
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 22
  • [40] Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the simplified chinese version of the fremantle back awareness questionnaire in patients with low back Pain
    Fanqi Hu
    Chao Liu
    Shiqi Cao
    Xiangyu Wang
    Weibo Liu
    Teng Li
    Xiaoqing Yang
    Xuesong Zhang
    European Spine Journal, 2022, 31 : 935 - 942