Cross-cultural adaptation of The Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire: A methodological systematic review

被引:1
|
作者
Zhou, Ai-fang [1 ,2 ]
Li, Zhuo-yao [1 ]
Cui, Xue-jun [1 ]
Sng, Kim Sia [1 ]
Zhu, Ke [1 ]
Wang, Yong-jun [3 ]
Shu, Bing [3 ]
Zhang, Jian-ping [4 ]
Yao, Min [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Univ Tradit Chinese Med, Longhua Hosp, Spine Dis Inst, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Univ Tradit Chinese Med, Sch Rehabil, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Univ Tradit Chinese Med, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Shanghai Jinshan Dist Hosp Integrated Tradit Chine, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[5] Shanghai Univ Tradit Chinese Med, Longhua Hosp, Spine Dis Inst, 725 South Wanping Rd, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Japanese orthopaedic association back pain; evaluation questionnaire (JOABPEQ); Low back pain (LBP); Systematic review; Cross -cultural adaptation; VALIDITY; RELIABILITY; VERIFICATION; VALIDATION; VERSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jos.2022.08.003
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) is a reliable and sensitive measure of disability to determine functional status and evaluate curative effects in low back pain, it has now been cross-cultural translated into many other languages and adapted for use in different countries. We aim to evaluate the translation procedures and measurement properties of cross-cultural adaptations of the JOABPEQ. Methods: Studies related to cross-cultural adaptation of the JOABPEQ in a specific language/culture were searched in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, SciELO, PsycINFO, SinoMed, and Web of Science from their inception to March 2022. The Guidelines for the Process of Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Self-Report Measures and the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Status Measurement In-struments guideline were used for evaluation. Results: Nine different versions of cross-cultural JOABPEQ adaptations in 8 different languages/cultures were included. The adaptation process was not strictly performed, such as standard forward translation and expert committee review were rarely reported. Content validity (8/9), floor and ceiling effects (3/9), reliability (4/9), and interpretability (6/9) were assessed in most of the adaptations, while agreement (2/ 9), responsiveness (2/9), and the internal consistency (2/9) were not. JOABPEQ can replace functional and quality of life score to reduce the burden of scientific research. Conclusion: We recommend Persian-Iranian, simplified Chinese-Chinese Mandarin, Thai and Gunaydin G's Turkish adaptations for application. The numerical pain rating scale/visual analogue scale in low back pain and lower extremities, as well as numbness in lower extremities could not be neglected in JOABPEQ adaptations.(c) 2022 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of The Japanese Orthopaedic Association.
引用
收藏
页码:984 / 991
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the fremantle back awareness questionnaire into persian language and the assessment of reliability and validity in patients with chronic low back pain
    Mahmoudzadeh, Ashraf
    Abbaszadeh, Sam
    Baharlouei, Hamzeh
    Karimi, Abdolkarim
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2020, 25
  • [22] Cross-cultural adaptation of the delphi definitions of low back pain prevalence (German DOLBaPP)
    Leonhardt, Marja
    Liebers, Falk
    Dionne, Clermont E.
    Latza, Ute
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2014, 15
  • [23] Mc Gill Pain Questionnaire: A Cross-Cultural Adaptation Study in Chronic Neck Pain
    Shroff, Riddhi
    Dabholakar, Twinkle
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY, 2023, 10 (02) : 19 - 23
  • [24] Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Back Beliefs Questionnaire in Modern Standard Arabic
    Maki, Dana
    Rajab, Ebrahim
    Watson, Paul J.
    Critchley, Duncan J.
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2017, 39 (03) : 272 - 280
  • [25] The Fremantle Back Awareness Questionnaire: cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Italian version in people with chronic low back pain
    Monticone, Marco
    Maurandi, Carolina
    Porcu, Elisa
    Arippa, Federico
    Wand, Benedict M.
    Corona, Giorgio
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2024, 25 (01)
  • [26] Spanish translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Argentine version of the Back Pain Attitudes Questionnaire
    Pierobon, Andres
    Oscar Policastro, Pablo
    Solino, Santiago
    Darlow, Ben
    Andreu, Mauro
    Adrian Novoa, Gabriel
    Agustin Raguzzi, Ignacio
    Jose Villalba, Federico
    MUSCULOSKELETAL SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2020, 46
  • [27] Arabic translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and psychometric properties of the low back pain knowledge questionnaire
    Kanaan, Saddam
    Khraise, Hana'a
    Almhdawi, Khader A.
    Natour, Jamil
    Oteir, Alaa O.
    Mansour, Zaid M.
    PHYSIOTHERAPY THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2022, 38 (12) : 2202 - 2212
  • [28] Arabic version of the Back Pain Attitudes Questionnaire: Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and psychometric properties
    Kanaan, Saddam F.
    Khraise, Hana'a
    Almhdawi, Khader A.
    Darlow, Ben
    Oteir, Alaa O.
    Mansour, Zaid M.
    JOURNAL OF BACK AND MUSCULOSKELETAL REHABILITATION, 2021, 34 (01) : 59 - 67
  • [29] Structural validity of the Japanese Orthopedic Association back pain evaluation questionnaire in individuals with chronic low back pain
    Pinheiro, Jocassia Silva
    Pontes-Silva, Andre
    Costa Araujo, Gabriel Gardhel
    Mendes, Leticia Padilha
    Pires, Flavio de Oliveira
    Fidelis-de-Paula-Gomes, Cid Andre
    Dibai-Filho, Almir Vieira
    REVISTA DA ASSOCIACAO MEDICA BRASILEIRA, 2021, 67 (08): : 1087 - 1092
  • [30] Systematic review of cross-cultural adaptations of McGill Pain Questionnaire reveals a paucity of clinimetric testing
    Costa, Luciola da Cunha Menezes
    Maher, Christopher G.
    McAuley, James H.
    Costa, Leonardo Oliveira Pena
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2009, 62 (09) : 934 - 943