Declining Use of Prone Positioning After High Initial Uptake in COVID-19 Adult Respiratory Distress Syndrome

被引:6
|
作者
Hochberg, Chad H. [1 ]
Psoter, Kevin J. [2 ]
Eakin, Michelle N. [1 ]
Hager, David N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Med, Div Pulm & Crit Care Med, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Pediat, Baltimore, MD USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
adult respiratory distress syndrome; COVID-19; implementation science; intensive care units; prone position; CORONAVIRUS DISEASE 2019; ARDS;
D O I
10.1097/CCM.0000000000005969
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES: Prone positioning for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has historically been underused, but was widely adopted for COVID-19-associated ARDS early in the pandemic. Whether this successful implementation has been sustained over the first 3 years of the COVID-19 pandemic is unknown. In this study, we characterized proning use in patients with COVID-19 ARDS from March 2020 to December 2022.DESIGN: Multicenter retrospective observational study.SETTING: Five-hospital health system in Maryland, USA.PATIENTS: Adults with COVID-19 supported with invasive mechanical ventilation and with a P(a)o(2)/Fio(2) ratio of less than or equal to 150 mm Hg while receiving Fio(2) of greater than or equal to 0.6 within 72 hours of intubation.INTERVENTIONS: None.MEASUREMENTS: We extracted demographic, clinical, and positioning data from the electronic medical record. The primary outcome was the initiation of proning within 48 hours of meeting criteria. We compared proning use by year with univariate and multivariate relative risk (RR) regression. Additionally, we evaluated the association of treatment during a COVID-19 surge period and receipt of prone positioning.MAIN RESULTS: We identified 656 qualifying patients; 341 from 2020, 224 from 2021, and 91 from 2022. More than half (53%) met severe ARDS criteria. Early proning occurred in 56.2% of patients in 2020, 56.7% in 2021, and 27.5% in 2022. This translated to a 51% reduction in use of prone positioning among patients treated in 2022 versus 2020 (RR = 0.49; 95% CI, 0.33-0.72; p < 0.001). This reduction remained significant in adjusted models (adjusted RR = 0.59; 95% CI, 0.42-0.82; p = 0.002). Treatment during COVID-19 surge periods was associated with a 7% increase in proning use (adjusted RR = 1.07; 95% CI, 1.02-1.13; p = 0.01).CONCLUSIONS: The use of prone positioning for COVID-19 ARDS is declining. Interventions to increase and sustain appropriate use of this evidence-based therapy are warranted.
引用
收藏
页码:1547 / 1551
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparing Prone Positioning Use in COVID-19 Versus Historic Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
    Hochberg, Chad H.
    Psoter, Kevin J.
    Sahetya, Sarina K.
    Nolley, Eric P.
    Hossen, Shakir
    Checkley, William
    Kerlin, Meeta P.
    Eakin, Michelle N.
    Hager, David N.
    CRITICAL CARE EXPLORATIONS, 2022, 4 (05) : E0695
  • [2] Response to prone positioning in COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a retrospective observational study
    Zeinab Adawy
    Ayman Iskandarani
    Abeer Alharbi
    Yara A. Iskandarani
    Gufran Salem
    Dalya A. Iskandarani
    Abdul Rahman H. Ali
    Mohammed A. Salem
    Eman Sobh
    The Egyptian Journal of Bronchology, 18
  • [3] Response to prone positioning in COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a retrospective observational study
    Adawy, Zeinab
    Iskandarani, Ayman
    Alharbi, Abeer
    Iskandarani, Yara A.
    Salem, Gufran
    Iskandarani, Dalya A.
    Ali, Abdul Rahman H.
    Salem, Mohammed A.
    Sobh, Eman
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF BRONCHOLOGY, 2024, 18 (01)
  • [4] ECMO combined with prone positioning strategies in COVID-19 respiratory distress syndrome
    Xu, Yue
    Chou, Yueh-ting
    Wei, Xin-guang
    Zhang, Shan-feng
    Jiang, Feng
    Liu, Yan
    PERFUSION-UK, 2022, 37 (04): : 417 - 421
  • [5] Prone positioning in Covid-19 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome and invasive mechanical ventilation
    Barja-Martinez, E.
    Garcia-Gonzalez, S.
    Jimenez-Garcia, E.
    Thuissard-Vasallo, I. J.
    Arias-Rivera, S.
    Blanco-Abril, S.
    ENFERMERIA INTENSIVA, 2023, 34 (02): : 80 - 89
  • [6] Physiological response to prone positioning in intubated adults with COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome: a retrospective study
    Boffi, Andrea
    Ravenel, Maximilien
    Lupieri, Ermes
    Schneider, Antoine
    Liaudet, Lucas
    Gonzalez, Michel
    Chiche, Jean-Daniel
    Piquilloud, Lise
    RESPIRATORY RESEARCH, 2022, 23 (01)
  • [7] Physiological response to prone positioning in intubated adults with COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome: a retrospective study
    Andrea Boffi
    Maximilien Ravenel
    Ermes Lupieri
    Antoine Schneider
    Lucas Liaudet
    Michel Gonzalez
    Jean-Daniel Chiche
    Lise Piquilloud
    Respiratory Research, 23
  • [8] A case of meralgia paresthetica caused by prone positioning in a COVID-19 patient with acute respiratory distress syndrome
    Karaaslan, Tahsin
    Avarisli, Aysenur
    Durdu, Bulent
    Daskaya, Hayrettin
    EMERGENCY CARE JOURNAL, 2022, 18 (01)
  • [9] Effect of Extended Prone Positioning in Intubated COVID-19 Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, a Revision Letter
    Ferriere-Steinert, Santiago
    Acevedo de la Barra, Maximiliano
    Neman, Alexandra
    Vergara Ceron, Tamara
    Cornejo, Rodrigo A.
    Gajardo, Abraham I. vn J.
    JOURNAL OF INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2024,
  • [10] Effects of prone position in acute respiratory distress syndrome secondary to COVID-19: Experience in a high complexity hospital
    Vivanco-Aravena, Paulina
    Hernandez, Ivan
    Troncozo, Cristian
    Gomez, Francisco
    Pino, Rita
    REVISTA MEDICA CLINICA LAS CONDES, 2023, 34 (03): : 195 - 203